Case Study: Wealth Maximisation And Time Value Of Money

1941 Words4 Pages

Q1. Investment appraisal (a) Project A Project B Project C Project D Initial investment $120000 $160000 $90000 $70000 Annual cash flow ($40000-$16000-$12000) $12000 ($75000-$27000-$16000) $32000 ($60000-$15000-$9000) $36000 ($60000-$18000-$7000) $85000 Payback period: initial investment/ annual cash flow 120000/12000 10 years 160000/32000 5 years $90000/36000 2.5 years $70000/85000 2 years Project C and D are acceptable as both of their payback periods are less than the pre specified number of years which is 3 years in this case. According to the payback method of analysis, projects with shorter payback periods are better to invest in, Hence, project D should be accepted as it is most liquid and less risky to …show more content…

How large a fund will you need when you retire in 20 years to provide the 30-year, $20,000 retirement annuity? N 30 I/YR 11 PMT 20000 FV 0 PV?? 173875.85 b. How much will you need today as a single amount to provide the fund calculated in part (a) if you earn only 9% per year during the 20 years preceding retirement? N 20 I/YR 9 PMT 0 FV -173875.85 PV?? 31024.82 c. An increase in the rate earned will decrease the present value. This is because higher interest rate will mean that less money will be set aside today in order to earn the future value calculated above. For example, to earn $173875.82 in 20 years with interest rate lower than 9% will decrease the present value of $31024.82. d. Now assume that you will earn 10% from now through the end of your retirement. You want to make 20 end-of-year deposits into your retirement account that will fund the 30-year stream of $20,000 annual annuity payments. How large do your annual deposits have to …show more content…

Liquidity Ratio Formula 2015 2014 Current ratio Current assets/current liabilities 3.269 2.994 Quick Ratio (current assets – inventory)/ current liabilities 0.661 0.469 Inventory turnover Cost of goods sold/ inventory 0.993 0.971 The financial health of MHJ does not look promising as it can be seen above even though the current ratio indicates that the company is able to pay its debt in the longer period but in the short run the quick ratio suggests that MHJ is unable to pay its current debts that fall due within a year as the ratio is below 1. The inventory turnover ratio is low which means the company is not efficiently turning their inventory over into sales. Capital structure Formula 2015 2016 Debt ratio Total liabilities/total assets 0.465 0.467 The debt ratio shows that MHJ has 0.465 assets to repay $1 of liability in 2015 and 0.476 in 2014. This is an indicator that MHJ is not able to repay it debt when they fall due. Profitability Formula 2015 2014 Gross profit margin Gross profit/sales 0.640 0.640 Operating profit margin EBIT/sales 7.95 8.88 REFERENCE LIST Besley, S., Brigham, E. (2014) CFIN (4th edition). Australia,

More about Case Study: Wealth Maximisation And Time Value Of Money

Open Document