Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of change in organizations
Importance of organizational change
Reflection of organization change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of change in organizations
Organizational Change "The effectiveness of organizational change is greatest when a firm’s strategy is consistent with environmental conditions and there is internal consistency." (D A Nadler, 2003:204) The only thing that is constant in this world is change and this is widely acknowledged by many in the world, may it be a corporation or a social forum or a governmental body. What comes in this world has to experience change in the light of environmental elements and pressures and influences, internal or external. The study of organizational behavior gives that environmental factors are the political, legal, economic, demographic, technological, social and societal. While these are the external environmental factors that are and cannot be counted among the controllable factors for an organization, they do in fact influence organizational structure, policies and strategies. In turn, the internal environment of the organization, that is very much controlled by the management of the organization and comprises of the top to bottom managerial levels, the staff, the employees, the board of directors, the owners etc. this internal environment, is to a great extent the result of external environmental factors, the change of which results in the direct impact on the internal environment of the organization. As such in lieu of external environmental factors; change agents with in the organization tend to accept the change in their external factors and tries to bring about a compatible change within the internal environment of the organization. The effectiveness of the change that is being brought about with in the organization as a result of the changing external environmental forces is best when, as described by Nadler, the internal facto...
... middle of paper ...
...uctive interpersonal associations. Many have argued that the change effectiveness works as a fundamental hub in every one organizational scrutiny, standing-in as the objective or organization plan and organization modification. Even though, there are people that put forward that there are confines in the characterization of this perception as many have the same opinion that the organizational effectiveness perception mirrors and be a symbol of a wide range of wanted organizational results. But this can be achieved by equating the equation by means of continuous improvement, kaizen, in terms of values, culture, beliefs and norms that accept that “effectiveness of organizational change is greatest when a firm’s strategy is consistent with environmental conditions and there is internal consistency”. Reference Todd. D Jick and Maury Peiper: 2003 (2nd edition) Managing
Our change situation will be replacing workers by increasing machines and bringing out new technology. As these days it was very difficult to hire the employees with professional skills, they made some changes in the workplace. As the manpower will also take on a major part in increasing production by operating machines, they have broken in that experiment. In this difficult business environment, leaders should be able to discharge their functions in such a way that they provide the proper guidance to fill in their goals. To treat this kind of situations, these are the most important things we should look at. (James.k, 1967)
Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.
Organizational changes are constant in both the public and private sector. Some changes are small and easily managed and others are large scale vision changes. With organization-wide changes, such as a redirection in the organizations vision, strong creative leaders are needed to ensure the vision is sold to the employees and that the change is implemented smoothly. The Virginia Department of Corrections (VADOC) has recently changed visions to strengthen the way we create long term public safety. This change in mission and vision statements was a smooth process but has not been implemented without its share of issues.
Change is a fundamental element of individuals, groups and all sorts of organizations. As it is the case for individuals, groups and societies, where change is a continuous process, composed of an indefinite amount of smaller sub-changes that vary in effect and length, and is affected by all sorts of aspects and events, many of which cyclic are anticipated ones. It is also the case for organizations, where change occurs repeatedly during the life cycle of organizations. Yet change in organizations is not as anticipated nor as predictable, with unexpected internal and external variables and political forces that can further complicate the management of change (Andriopoulos, C. and P. Dawson, 2009), which is by itself, the focus of many scholars in their pursuit to shed light on and facilitate the change process (Kotter 1996; Levin 1947; et al).
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
Businesses play a significant role with the economies of all countries, whether developed or developing. It contributes to the welfare of the society through the satisfaction of needs, provides a source of livelihood to millions of people worldwide. Businesses do not operate in vacuums but operate within business environments. The events in the environment of a company have a direct effect on the success or failure of that company. According to Jain, Trehan and Trehan (2009), business environments can be categorized in two: (1) internal business environment; (2) external business environment. Institutions and organizations are usually in a position of controlling their internal business environment. By doing so, they gain the ability of affecting their institutional performance. On the contrary, it is difficult for a business to control the external environment; however, businesses can identify in advance the opportunities and threats presented by the external environment and take decisive actions to ensure its continued success (Jain, Trehan & Trehan, 2009; Goyal & Goyal, 2009).
Organizations experience two kinds of change: unplanned, or crescive change, and planned, or deliberate change. (Stojkovic et al., 2008) This essay will focus on the fundamental elements of planned organizational change. We will provide an example of how a police agency undergoing deliberate change could follow these steps.
The organisation’s success is influenced by factors operating in its internal and external environment. The organisation can increase its success by adopting strategies which manipulate factors to its advantage. A successful organisation will not only understand existing factor but will forecst how factors may change and plan how to take advantage to the changes.
The organizational environment comprises of the internal environment (representing factors within anorganization) and the external environment (comprising of factors outside the organization). The organizational environment is always changing and highly uncertain and these factors impact on the organization’s operations and performance. Therefore,managers must be conscience of the ever-changing
Organizations usually face change due to many forces surrounding the business. The forces can be from internal or external sources. External forces of change usually occur outside of the organization and it could have a global effect. There four external forces for change: demographic characteristics, technological advancements, market changes, and social and political pressures (Kreitner-Kinicki, 2003). The internal forces for change come from inside the organization. The forces come from human problems and managerial behaviors and decisions.
Through different changes faced by the organization such as economic, political, technological, globalization, and competition it is needed to make able to adapt changeable environment.
Any change in an environment has a direct impact on organization in different ways because an organization is critically dependent on the environment in which it exists.
The idea of change is the most constant factor in business today and organisational change therefore plays a crucial role in this highly dynamic environment. It is defined as a company that is going through a transformation and is in a progressive step towards improving their existing capabilities. Organisational change is important as managers need to continue to commit and deliver today but must also think of changes that lie ahead tomorrow. This is a difficult task because management systems are design, and people are rewarded for stability. These two main factors will be discussed with reasons as to why organisational change is necessary for survival, but on the other hand why it is difficult to accomplish.
Organisation is the most important element in management. Any organization is located and operated in the environment. Every action of all organizations is possible only if it allows its realization. The internal environment is the source of its vitality. It involves the capacity needed for the functioning of the organization, but at the same time can be a source of problems and even her death of the organisation. The external environment is the source that supply organization resources. The organization is in constant exchange with the external environment consequently it provides itself with survival. The main objective of this work is to consider elements of the internal and external environment of the organization which are in a constant
Different organizations typically face change due to many forces surrounding their mission. These forces can be from either internal or external sources. The External forces usually occur outside of the organization and it could have a global effect. According to Kreitner-Kinichi (2003) the four external forces for change are demographic characteristics, technological advancements, market changes, and social and political pressures. The internal forces for change come from inside the organization like human problems, managerial behaviors and decisions.