Sociological Criticism Of Modern Romance

1530 Words4 Pages

Noted Pop-Culture comedian Aziz Ansari, with the assistance of New York University Sociologist Eric Klinenberg, attempts to make sense of the current dating environment in his new book Modern Romance. By employing elements of humor, historical reference, and contemporary sociological techniques, the authors present both the advantages and disadvantages of the search for love and happiness in the new millennium. This paradox is exemplified by the question of whether or not we are better off now, with more choices in our lives, than we were seventy five years ago. Because living focus groups were employed to gather data, the range of the book dates from post-World War II to the present and its members from the “Greatest Generation” to Millennials. . …show more content…

Their premise is that emerging adulthood is a relatively recent phenomenon. According to the respondents of the older focus group, the average age of marriage in the 1950’s was lower by a factor of approximately 7 years (Ansari and Klinenberg 7). Several factors account for this which are part of the lack of an emerging adulthood phase. The world was quite simply a much smaller place. People’s life experiences were often defined in terms of city blocks as opposed to miles or geographic regions. Also, marriage represented type of liberation. Most young people lived at home with their parents until they entered the marriage and job

More about Sociological Criticism Of Modern Romance

Open Document