Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
abortion ethical dilemma
response to don marquis abortion
REASON ABORTION IS NOT MURDER
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: abortion ethical dilemma
*Even though his beliefs go against a standard pro-life argument, Don Marquis believes that abortion is immoral because it deprives the victim of a future and is similar to murdering an adult or killing an animal. The argument that Marquis makes for both pro-choice and pro-life are very similar but are both unsuccessful because each party is convinced that their side is correct. Women who are pro-life make the argument that a fetus possess characteristics such as genetic code that make it identifiable as a human as early as conception. Pro-life women believe that this is obvious, which will establish this reasoning on why abortion is murder. This position is supported by moral principle, according to an anti-abortionist. Contrary to a pro-life …show more content…
When an embryo or a fetus is aborted, they lack the ability to have the same experiences as an adult that lives a normal lifespan. The loss of life is the greatest loss that a human can suffer and the effect of murder, including abortion, has a deeper effect on the victim as opposed to the victim’s friends and family or the murderer. When a human is murdered, they are deprived of any future experiences, activities, projects, or enjoyments. “When I am killed, I am deprived both of what I now value which would have been part of my future personal life, but also what I would come to value” (Marquis 322). Marquis also mentions that premature deaths, such as a death from a terminal illness, is similar to a death after a normal life span because premature death makes the victim lose any future they may have experienced. If a person who was terminally ill decided to end their life via a physician-assisted suicide, they will not suffer any loss, according to Marquis. Marquis explains that not every aspect of our future is valued currently but we will learn to value these aspects as we age, such as attending one university over the other or breaking up with a significant other. These are all experiences that many people face that they do not currently value but will effects on their life in the future. If this person was killed, they would not have the opportunity to make decisions such as what college to attend or who to marry. Where Marquis lacks in his argument is that embryos and fetuses are not sentient beings therefore they lack the ability to value their future. They do not understand that they have future experiences or enjoyments. Fetuses and also infants included are not aware of emotions or motivations similarly to an adult. “The future of a standard fetus includes a set of experiences, projects, activities, and such which are
What is abortion? Abortion is killing a fetus inside a mother’s womb. According to Don Marquis, killing a fetus is morally impermissible. Marquis came up with an argument that views abortion as immoral and only in rare cases is it accepted. There are only a few rare cases that abortion is morally acceptable according to Marquis in his article, “Why Abortion is Immoral.” Marquis’s view on abortion is relatable because I am a woman and seeing as I am able to bare a child, I feel it is a women’s right to decide if abortion is permissible or not because it is her body and she has all the rights to her own body. Later described is FLO, one of Marquis’s arguments proving abortion is morally impermissible. I do not agree with the FLO argument. Marquis makes strong points, which can be agreeable, but in summary of Marquis’s arguments, he needs to have a more valid case of FLO.
In Don Marquis’s essay “Why Abortion is Immoral” he argues that abortion is immoral because he believes that abortion is morally equivalent to killing an adult human being. Marquis’ argument takes the following form:
In this essay, I will hold that the strongest argument in defence of abortion was provided by Judith Jarvis Thompson. She argued that abortion is still morally permissible, regardless if one accepts the premise that the foetus is a person from the moment of conception. In what follows, I agree that abortion is permissible in the ‘extreme case’ whereby the woman’s life is threatened by the foetus. Furthermore, I agree that abortion is permissible to prevent future pain and suffering to the child. However, I do not agree that the ‘violinist’ analogy is reliable when attempting to defend abortion involving involuntary conception cases such as rape, whereby the foetus does not threaten the woman’s health. To achieve this, I will highlight the distinction
Thus, Marquis’ argument for his pro-life view on abortion is flawed because one of his premises is not completely correct. Marquis argues that fetuses, children, and adults are all human beings and have the right to life. Also, Marquis says that losing one’s life is one of the worst things that can happen to a human being. So he technically declares that it is horrible to die, but not the worst thing to happen to someone. He starts out with the first premise about how the killing of a fetus deprives it of its potential future experiences.
Famous author Dr. Seuss states that a “person is a person no matter how small.”
...ice. While I value my experience, as I feel should be commonly held by others and the way in which we interact (killing adults is wrong), I don’t see a strong enough basis for that view to be held for a fetus. As Marquis summarized, the killing of a fetus is essentially arbitrarily choosing a human cell. Although fetuses in first trimester aren’t single celled organisms, they serve no cognitive function or purposes to themselves, so there are no features in which it is being deprived of if it is terminated. The potential life of a fetus is the same as saying there is a potential for any such biological thing, it is simply a scenario, which could happen if given the opportunity. But if an adult human possesses the ability to have goals and desires, they then should be allowed to make the discretion for their best interest to whether an abortion is permissible or not.
In America abortion is one of the most heavily debated topics in recent years. Pro-life or pro-choice? Many people believe it is immoral and even consider abortion to be murder. The definition of abortion states “The termination of pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo prior to being capable of normal growth” Did you know that 1 in 3 women in the U.S. will have an abortion in their lifetime? (Baker, Aspen. "A Better Way to Talk about Abortion." Aspen Baker:. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Aug. 2016.) When first researching this topic I wondered, “What’s the big deal? Why would it matter if someone who was never even born, died?” And I realized that babies that would have been born due to abortion,
Don Marquis is a philosopher arguing that any form of abortion is immoral. His original thesis states: In the overwhelming majority of cases, deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. He begins by stating why killing is wrong in three statements. He states, “killing is wrong because it brutalizes the killer, it is a loss to others, and it robs the victim of all the experiences, activities, projects, and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one’s future” (68). The first two statements do not address the fetus, but the last statement is very arguable, so Marquis emphasizes his argument on this premise. Depriving anybody of their future has many consequences. Some parts of a person’s future are valued now and some parts could be valued later. Therefore, it is wrong to kill any adult human because it is a loss of future (which has value). He addresses the questions of personhood by stating that fetuses have the potential to be humans. Therefore, killing a fetus is depriving the fetus of having a
The following essay will examine the morality of abortion with specific reference to the writings of Don Marquis, Judith Jarvis Thompson, Peter Singer and Mary Anne Warren. I will begin by assessing the strength of the argument provided by Marquis which claims that abortion is impermissible because it deprives a being of a potential “future like ours,” and then go on to consider the writings of Singer, Thomson and Warren to both refute Marquis claims and support my assertion that abortion is morally permissible primarily because of the threat to the freedom and bodily autonomy of women extending the right to life to a foetus in utero would pose.
Why Abortion is Immoral by Don Marquis is an essay that claims that abortion is morally wrong, and uses one argument in particular to explain why. He argues that many of us would agree that it is wrong to kill a human, and if you believe that then you should also have that view on abortions. If you think killing is wrong then you think all killing is wrong and the persons biological state, whether it is when a person is a fetus, one years old, or thirty years old, makes no difference. He then explains that killing is wrong not only because it is immoral, but wrong because it deprives the victim of life and the enjoyments one would have otherwise experienced; which Marquis believes is the greatest lost one can suffer (Marquis, 189). Given certain circumstances Marquis agrees there are cases where killing is acceptable, but nonetheless it is immoral.
Abortion may be one of the most controversial topics in America today. Abortion is defined as “the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus” (cite dictionary). There are really only two sides on people’s opinion on abortion; pro-life which means abortion should be outlawed and pro-choice which means a woman should be able to decide whether she wants to keep her baby. Thousands of protests and riots have begun due to the fact pro-life activists believe abortion should become illegal. Both sides bring valid points to support their decision that could sway any person’s thoughts. The Roe v. Wade law has allowed abortion to be legal in the U.S since 1973 (Chittom & Newton, 2015). The law “gives women total control over first trimester abortions and grants state legislative control over second and third trimester abortions” (Chittom & Newton, 2015). Ever since the law was put in place, millions of people have tried to overturn it and still
The subject of abortion is a tough one. Many people have many different views on it. I do my best to always respect other’s views on sensitive subjects, but when it comes to abortion I become easily agitated. Wendell Berry’s essay, Caught in the Middle, did not irritate me. It includes a very well thought out examination of his views on abortion, and why those are his views. I cannot say I completely agree with every aspect of his arguments but I do agree with the conclusion he came too.
To conclude, Marquis’s argument that abortion is wrong is incorrect. Thomson gives many examples of why Marquis is wrong, including that the mother’s right to her body
By week five the fetus’ brain, spinal cord, heart and other organs begin to form. Many people believe that the fetus is a baby, human, from the moment of conceptions others believe it’s when the heart starts to beat or not until the moment of birth. In 1981 the first open-womb retail surgery was preformed and are able to observe the unborn reacting to painful stimuli. Physicians are now suggesting that around 20 weeks, anaesthesia should be provided for the unborn child prior to the abortion. Meanwhile, abortions are done at any stage now and pro-abortion advocates believe that the fetus cannot feel pain as doctors twists off their arms and legs. In the United States, t is illegal to kill an Eagle’s egg, however it is legal to kill an unborn child. Meaning that killing an unborn animal is against the law, but it is okay to kill an unborn child. By having an abortion, it is depriving the child from living a potential life, it takes away the child’s life to live. Kohlberg says we learn right from wrong at a young age by punishments and rewards. Within society we learn that murder is wrong, and in court cases people are sent away because they ended the heartbeat of another person, therefor murdering them. Yet it is seen that abortions are acceptable, but within week five their heartbeat is formed and
Abortion “is an issue that raises questions about life and death, about what a person is and when one becomes a person, about the meaning of life, about the rights of women, and about the duties of men”(Velasquez 485). Abortion is an unresolved ethical issue that has been in doubt for many years because one can argue that you are killing an innocent person/fetus but many argue that is not person because they don’t have a conscious or the characteristics that defines a “person”. John Stuart Mill in a way justifies abortion, Mill is known to be openly speak about women’s rights and about human rights. Although, it might be immortal to end someone’s life one might argued that the individual has the right to choose and have the option. But in