Firstly, let us discuss the principles of democracy – the equality of man and his inalienable right to liberty. Montesquieu informs us that “The corruption of… government generally begins with that of the principles.” This corruption can occur in two ways – through both the destruction of equality amongst citizens and through the overvaluation of equality by the citizenry itself. The first, obvious enough to those here, destroys the principle of democratic government through preventing a man to have his voice be heard and accounted for and, as such, places that man under the tyranny of his rulers. The second, though, is perhaps less obvious. The overvaluation of equality by citizens leads them to seek to control every aspect of governments themselves rather than electing officials to represent them – they, in their multitude, all seek to draft every piece of legislation, to execute every law, to make every ruling. This is impossible and prevents self-government through citizens deciding who should work on their behalf. When this occurs, w...
... middle of paper ...
My countrymen, we must avoid this outcome at all costs. Montesquieu writes that “once the principles of government are corrupted, the very best laws become bad, and turn against the state: but when the principles are sound, even bad laws have the same effect as good; the force of the principle draws everything to it” (136). Once corruption of the essential principles of liberty occurs, we simply cannot avoid a complete collapse of the noble system of government we seek to create. The problem is never what laws the king makes, only that there is a king who makes the laws and not the people. Likewise, we must work to ensure that even if a small republic and weaker government may seem less desirable than a utopia in which man is both heard, strongly governed and liberty is ample, it is better to have this less desirable outcome than risk the destruction of liberty.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Within democracies there is great dilemma between security (keeping the country and citizens safe) and liberty (honoring individual rights and freedoms). Many would attest that having both is vital to having a democracy. However, during specific periods, the government may value security above liberty or vice versa. In the particular scenario where a country goes to war, the true significance of the debate between security and liberty unveils. More specifically in a situation where a country orders a draft and enacts laws ordering those who protest against the war to be thrown in jail.... [tags: loyal citizens, United States constitution]
1409 words (4 pages)
- Many philosophical theories and arguments were used during the establishment of government in the United States. These arguments told of the virtues of democracy as an instrument, and some suggested, that democracy was based on the moral rights of men having equality and liberty regardless of the outcomes. As an instrument, “John Stuart Mills believed that since democracy brings a lot of people into the process of decision making, it can take advantage of many sources of information and critical assessment of laws and policies.” (Christiano) Although the United States is technically a Republic, the idea that the people give authority to the representatives of their choosing still has the f... [tags: Democracy, Voter turnout, Voting, Election]
1278 words (3.7 pages)
- Many Americans are proud to live in a country that claims to be a democracy. They are enlightened to know that “the people” have the power to actively participate in the decision making process of the government. They constantly show pride and faith on the principles of democracy everywhere they go. Yet, there are many who also seem to disapprove of the process that others so claim to be the best form of rule of government. Some Americans might believe that being able to vote and participate in presidential elections is one of the truest forms of democracy, but this is not the case.... [tags: Democracy, Elections, Election]
1296 words (3.7 pages)
- Throughout time, there has been debate about security and liberty. Many would agree that having both is vital to having a democracy. However, during desperate times, the government might place security or liberty on a higher pedestal and this can be beneficial or detrimental to the society. In the particular case where a country goes to war and the government orders a draft, the true significance of the debate between security and liberty is brought to light. Especially, in a circumstance where the government enacts laws ordering those who protest anti-war and anti-draft views to be thrown in jail, facing long jail sentences.... [tags: Democracy, Government]
1150 words (3.3 pages)
- The intention of liberalism is to allow the individual to live as they choose, however, obstacles such as economic conditions and inequality often block the individual from realizing their full potential. Government programs are implemented to combat these obstacles and aid individuals in obtaining opportunity and liberty in society. The basic human rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness according to the Constitution of the United States are guaranteed and it is the government’s role to protect those rights.... [tags: Liberalism, Political philosophy, Rights, Liberty]
1150 words (3.3 pages)
- Justice is seen as a concept that is balanced between law and morality. The laws that support social harmony are considered just. Rawls states that justice is the first virtue of social institutions; this means that a good society is one structured according to principles of justice. The significance of principles of justice is to provide a way of assigning rights and duties in the basic institutions of the society and defining the appropriate distribution of the benefits and burdens of the society.... [tags: Law, Morality]
1543 words (4.4 pages)
- There are various systems of governance, namely democracy, autocratic, authoritarian, despotic, dictatorial, tyrannical, totalitarian, absolutist, traditional, monarchic, oligarchic, plutocratic, aristocratic, and sultanistic. Of all the systems of governance named democracy is the only system which takes into consideration the rights of the people. All the other forms, power is given to individual or individuals, because of wealth or birthright. Democracy according to Dahl “is a system of governance in which rulers are held accountable for their actions in the public realm by citizens, acting indirectly through the competition and cooperation of their elected representative”, (4).... [tags: system of governance,liberation,soverighty]
1606 words (4.6 pages)
- Topic 1 John Stuart Mill included various sets of principles under “the appropriate region of liberty.” Of these principles, Mill listed the first principle such that they are encompassed in one category. According to Mill, the first principle included, “the inward domain of consciousness; demanding liberty of conscience, in the most comprehensive sense; liberty of thought and feeling... or theological.” Within this principle, individuals have the right of picking whatsoever they desire and minting a liberty that affect themself.... [tags: political and philosophical analysis]
549 words (1.6 pages)
- During the Jacksonian era, Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay, along with countless other Americans, held strong in their beliefs and the pursuit of their individual rights of freedom, liberty, and independence. The Jacksonian period was a time in American history that has been personified as a time of extreme change and upheaval in the areas of economic growth, political interests, and expansion. It was the tremendous shifts in these areas that threatened to surpass and exceed the very principles of freedom, liberty, and independence that the American Revolution had been fought over, and in which the United States of America had been founded.... [tags: Jacksonian Era, American History]
1288 words (3.7 pages)
- Winston Churchill once remarked that “democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried”. In agreement with his statement, this paper will examine the problems of democratic governments using specific examples, and compare it to the failure of fascist governments in Nazi Germany and Italy and communist governments in the Soviet Union and China. Theoretically, democracy is a stable form of government where power is in the hands of the people. In a democracy, people have the liberty to elect officials that best represent their interests, and political institutions exist as a result: Benjamin Constant argues in The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of... [tags: Analysis, Winston Churchill]
1361 words (3.9 pages)