However, The House of Lords reveal the precision of Gooley’s observation that the separate legal entity doctrine was a “two – edged sword”. Salomon’s principle was of vital importance as it encouraged individuals to provide money for businesses within the safety buffer of limited liability, leading to increase the country’s economic prosperity. Hicks believes that the success of Western capitalism linked directly by limited company and with the progress of industry and commerce. Therefore, Butler went so far as to say, “The limited liability corporation is the greatest single discovery of modern times. Even steam and electricity are far less important than the limited liability corporation”. However, the establishment of this principle does not come without its disadvantages as it is said that limited liability does not provide sufficient protection for creditors. ...
... middle of paper ...
... conventional remedy available. Therefore, the courts may hold shareholders liable for the company’s liabilities and lift the veil, according the statutory provisions such as section 761 of the Companies Act 2006 , sections 213 and 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
However, the House of Lords state in Woolfson v Strathclyde Regional Council that the courts should only pierce the veil in special circumstances without defined what exactly these circumstances were. It can be argued that there is not a true exception in Salomon principles but there are, merely, examples where the principles applies. However, the principle of limited liability is important for promote the prosperity and economic growth of company but it required a fine legislative balance to avoid the abuse by the unscrupulous and lawyers’ support that the legislature should lay down definite rules.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Utilizing & Restricting the Indispensable Limited Liability Corporation Efficiently Traditionally, the corporation is deemed to be a tool of gaining benefits for the corporation’s stockholders. The tool services for stockholders to get maximum benefit, however, the corporation cannot just service for its stockholders along with the expansion of the corporation business. The role played by corporation turns more and more important in society and it is going to be more and more influential among other benefit groups related to the corporation.... [tags: Corporation, Limited liability company]
1401 words (4 pages)
- Piercing the Corporate Veil Since the establishment in Salomon v Salomon, the separate legal personality has been long recognised in English law for centuries, that is to say, a limited liability company has its own legal identity distinct from its shareholders or directors. However, in certain circumstances the courts may be prepared to look behind the company at the actions of the directors and shareholders. This is known as "piercing the corporate veil". There are numerous cases concerning the "piercing the corporate veil", among which, Jones v Lipman was a typical case.... [tags: Papers]
512 words (1.5 pages)
- The Principle of Separate Corporate Personality The principle of separate corporate personality has been firmly established in the common law since the decision in the case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd, whereby a corporation has a separate legal personality, rights and obligations totally distinct from those of its shareholders. Legislation and courts nevertheless sometimes "pierce the corporate veil" so as to hold the shareholders personally liable for the liabilities of the corporation.... [tags: Papers]
2542 words (7.3 pages)
- In the following essay salmon v salmon will be used to analyse the bases of principle or test used to determined when the veil will be pierced in relation to statute or the court. Firstly, I would also like to examine the case of salmon v salmon in respect to the three principle that have provided a foundation to lifting the veil of incorporation. Follow by critical analysis of key terms that may be used to examine the cases that will be discussed. Finally, we will use salmons’ v salmon and subsequent cases and statues to analyse the three principle or test used to determined when the veil will be pierced.... [tags: Corporation, Corporations law, Legal entities]
1835 words (5.2 pages)
- The term “Limited liability” is generally used to describe a situation where a person is excused entirely or in part from incurring a debt after taking an action which would have required under the prevailing rules of the legal system that they pay money. The doctrine of limited liability as it relates to corporate law is central to the principle that a company upon incorporation assumes a corporate personality independent of its members. This means that a new legal person is created at law and accordingly has its own assets, liabilities and rights, inter alia, to enter into and be bound by its own contracts.... [tags: Business Finance ]
1531 words (4.4 pages)
- ... Fraud, Façade or Sham means that the courts will inspect from behind of the corporation where the corporation was found purely to escape a legally liability, or to let someone to do something which he is not allowed to do by individual. It is important for clearly the intention of the individual. When the corporate form has been used willingly, it will evade the existing liability which has upshot in the veil being lifted. This can be found in the case of Gilford Motor Co v Horne and Jones v Lipman & Re Bugle Press Ltd.... [tags: facade, legal, liability]
755 words (2.2 pages)
- A corporation under Company law or corporate law is specifically referred to as a "legal person"- as a subject of rights and duties that is capable of owning real property, entering into contracts, and having the ability to sue and be sued in its own name. In other words, a corporation is an artificial person that in most instances is legally treated as a person, and empowered with the attributes to own its own property, execute contracts, as well as ability to sue and be sued. One of the main motivations for forming a corporation or company is the limited liability it offers its shareholders.... [tags: Corporation, Limited liability company]
1186 words (3.4 pages)
- QUESTION: In the recent decision of Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom discussed circumstances when a court can pierce the corporate veil. What does the case tell us about the nature of the separate legal entity doctrine. How useful do you think this case will be in Australia. The doctrine of separate legal personality is central to corporate law and the functioning of companies in the modern world. This doctrine allows for a company, separate from its shareholders and members, to own its own property, have its own rights and responsibilities, and sue and be sued as its own entity.... [tags: personallity, liability, corporate law]
1571 words (4.5 pages)
- Separate Legal Personality, Limited Liability and the Corporate Veil Dignam and Lowry (2016) state that in order to understand the legal personality we need to keep the human being and legal persons separate as humanity is a state of nature while the legal personality is an artificial creation. They further state that legal personality can be given to non humans since humanity is not a requisite for legal personality. Kraakman, Armour, Hansmann state that corporate law allows a company to serve as a single contracting entity different from its owners and managers i.e.... [tags: Corporation, Legal entities, Subsidiary]
1997 words (5.7 pages)
- The Concept of the Corporate Veil The ‘unyielding rock’ of corporation law, as established and relied upon in Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd, is the concept of the separate juristic personality of a corporation. Out of this century-old principle, the legal structure of modern business was born. The foundation of corporation law thus rests on the concept that a company has a separate legal personality which is recognised in the Companies Act 71 of 2008 (“the Act’). Section 19 of the Act allows a company to act in its own capacity, distinct from the personal capacity of its directors and shareholders.... [tags: courts, corporation law]
1974 words (5.6 pages)