Primary Language Impairment of Bilingual Chidlren

1171 Words3 Pages

The article, “Three Treatments for Bilingual Children With Primary Language Impairment: Examining Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Domain Effects”, presents a study that was funded by a grant received from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD). A common developmental disorder such as the one examined in this study, Primary or Specific Language Impairment (PLI), is defined by poor language abilities not attributable to neurological, sensory, cognitive, or motor impairments or to environmental factors (Leonard, 1998; Schwartz, 2009). Children with PLI, show weakness in oral language that contribute to challenges in written language, significantly putting bilingual children with PLI at academic and social risk. The most obvious symptoms can shift with severity of the impairment, characteristics of the language(s) needed to be learned, and the child’s developmental stage. Bilingual children show significant impairment in both of their languages, as compared to their peers with similar language-learning experiences. Due to the significant lack of evidence needed to implement treatment protocols for bilingual children with PLI, researchers compared three different treatment programs that were administered by speech language pathologists (SLPs), on language and cognitive outcomes in Spanish/English bilingual children with PLI. Programs used a combination of computer-based and interactive training strategies.
Participants were 59 Spanish/English bilingual children with PLI, 50 of which were boys and 9 girls ranging in ages from 5;6 - 11;2. They all attended one of the eight schools in Minneapolis Public School district and had been receiving special educations services. Qualification for these SPED la...

... middle of paper ...

...m the pre- to post- testing across all experimental groups were relatively modest. Results for children in active treatment groups weren’t statistically different than the ones in the control group. The limited literature for PLI school age children suggested that the change was slow by standard scores on norm reference tests. It was noted that they had focused their analyses on the general measures of language and cognitive skills. The study was also affected by the sample size, especially the control group. It would have been productive if they considered each child’s characteristics at the starting point, and examinations of the effects of age, initial severity and language backgrounds. The author also noted, more homogeneous samples of bilingual children with PLI in future exploration and the overall intensity of the experimental treatment was high for children.

Open Document