Starbucks
Transnational corporations have had a tremendous impact on the interconnectivity that between countries, corporations, and people on a global landscape. Fueled by capitalistic ideals of increasing profits numerous corporations have expanded there operations into the global marketplace, some with much more success than others. One such transnational corporation that has embodied this pursuit of expansion in domestic and foreign markets for profit is the Starbucks Coffee Company. This company, which finds its roots in the opening of a single retail location in Pike place Market of Downtown Seattle in 1971, has been able to infiltrate into countless foreign domains and grow into a global powerhouse of the food and beverage industry with over nine thousand stores across the globe today in thirty-four countries outside of the Unites States.(Business Wire, 2005) Starbucks serves is an excellent specimen of a company that follows continual patterns of expansion directly correlating to increased access to foreign markets, and also the ability to nurture growth within these markets as well as gain access to new markets through the Market merging.
In my research of this company and its path to globalization, I found that information about certain aspects of the company were more readily available than others. For example, I found that I had more difficulty finding scholarly articles that dealt with the distinct business strategies that Starbuck’s employed in order to globalize, in that it became apparent that much of the information about the terms of their mergers and acquisitions were not released or that the companies and business groups that they did so with had websites that contained no information in English. Interestingly enough, I found more of an abundance of scholarly material on the homogeneous cultural impacts that Starbucks has had and how the spread of the company’s locations worldwide has been received by some cultures as the spread of American values. A bulk of my research findings came from business reports and releases about the company, which were useful in keeping accounts of how the company was able to infiltrate global markets and expand. The Website was a good starting point for my research in that it provided points of interest about the company that I could research into g...
... middle of paper ...
...lls for $11.45. That's a 90 per cent mark-up (The Ecologist, Vol.33, p.22, 2003)
The fact that Starbucks buys Fair Trade coffee in actuality does little to benefit the farmers who grow their beans. Another notable feature of the relationship between the owners, employees, and farmers is the overall disparity between employees at the corporate level and those employed to grow coffee beans,
Millions of coffee farmers survive on less than $2 a week. Orin C Smith,
Starbucks' president and CEO, was paid $1,088,269 in 2002, and received a bonus of L1,362,500. Exercising share options in the company made him a further $36,321,643. He stands to make around $8.5m more on share options granted in 2002. (The Ecologist, Vol.33, p.22, 2003)
The economic disparity between wages is a direct result of the practices Starbucks engages in, such as markups. The farmers, as well as the retail employees would gain from the continued global development of the company, in that higher demand for coffee would increase the price of coffee for farmers and stock options would benefit regular employees, but would do so to an exponentially smaller degree than the employees at the corporate level of operations.
In the article, it describes the benefits of Juan Valdez expanding in the United States. On the other hand, it shows how Starbucks will struggle in Colombia competing against an all Colombia company. Juan Valdez founding and operations are explain in the article. It also details how Starbucks uses new brands to keep customers going to the store. The article is a great example of international commerce in the world.
According to Starbucks Corporation (2016c), the company has “offered Fairtrade coffee since 2000 and in 2011 34.4 million pounds of Starbucks coffee purchases were certified making the company one of the largest purchasers of Fairtrade certified coffee in the world.” Fairtrade benefits the producer, consumer, and the company.
An article in the Seattle Post, describes the alliance that Starbucks is making to ensure that a sustainable supply of high quality of coffee is produce in Latin America. "Starbucks President and CEO Orin Smith said the alliance is partly his company's effort to pass on the "high price" of a cup of coffee to farmers." (Lee, 2004). He states that the high price enables them to pay the highest price to the farmers. Though the high prices to suppliers can demonstrate that money get to farmers with being diverted. Starbucks overall goal with this alliance is to buy 60 percent of its coffee under the standards agreed upon by 2007. "The agreement reflects the growing power of the premium coffee market and efforts to exploit it for the benefit of small farmers" (Lee, 2004).
Shah, A. J., Hawk, T. F., & A, T. A. (2011). Starbucks' Global Quest in 2006: Is the Best Yet to Come. In A. A. Marcus, Management Strategy: Achieving Sustained Competitive Advantage (pp. c468-c495). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schultz, H. (2011). Onward: How Starbucks fought for its life without losing its soul. New York: Rodale.
There have been some distinguished controllable and uncontrollable elements Starbucks has encountered when entering global markets. The strategies of any company’s goals are vital to its success. This is one area Starbucks has excelled in, just as McDonald’s has in recent years. Starbucks has paralleled its branding with the actions found at any Starbucks across the world. They have an excellent company vision, which they stick to, which in turn assists their brand image. Starbucks’ image has been achieved not only through this and their massive global entrance, but through their ability to provide honest quality service.
Biederman, P. S. (2005). Commentary on exporting a north american concept to asia: Starbucks in china. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 46(2), 288-290. doi: 10.1177/0010880405275536
Koehn, N.F., Besharov, M.A., & Miller, K. (2008). Starbucks Coffee Company in the 21st Century. [Case study]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
The main function of the company is its transaction activities which develop supply chain systems through which bind producer cooperatives in different countries. Besides that, the company with their strategies in the supply chain is trying to transform relations of production and trade. The trend of Starbucks’ marketing is murky for the distinction between its own system of supply chain and that of Fair Trade is the potential to ‘water down’ enablement results obtained at production places where they deviate from consumer purchases to corporate supply chains (Macdonald, 2007).
This paper will provide an argument for diversification to be presented to board of directors for Starbucks. A strategy for diversification indicating the products and industries for diversification and how synergies may be gained will be provided. The identification and the discussion of the foreign market Starbucks should enter will be presented, along with the strategy it should use to enter the market. Challenges Starbucks may face in the foreign market will be discussed, as well how it might respond strategically to minimize the impact of these challenges.
Starbucks has identified high value opportunity in China, India, Brazil and Japan. The large expansion opportunity of twelve billion in China alone is enough to drive Starbucks to expand globally. The organization has planned to double its footprint to 3000 stores in China by 2019 ("Starbucks Details Five-Year Plan to Accelerate Profitable Growth", 2014). Starbucks realizes that eventually there will be a diminishing return on their existing market within the US due to market maturity and there are only two ways to expand through diversification in their offerings and entering new markets. Given the international opportunity for growth and expansive tea market in Asia, the company will enjoy the benefits of the growth opportunity. Management’s decision to continue to grow globally is a driving force that has yielded
One of the main problems that Starbucks is facing at the present time is the ability to maintain national competitive advantage (Monash South Africa, 2014). Due to their local demand conditions, Starbucks tries to satisfy all customers by trying “to inspire and nurture the human spirit – one person, one cup and one neighborhood at a time” (Starbucks Corporation, 2014). Local demand conditons consist of a company trying satisfy needs of their closest customers and expanding their competitive advantage by upgrading their strategic management policies (Monash South Africa, 2014).
It is a well-known fact that Starbucks is expensive, and it is not only coffee the company sell but status. In today 's developing countries Starbucks represents a status symbol that separates the rich consumers from the masses especially in the continent of Asia. A cup of Starbucks cappuccino coffee costs more than 6 dollars in China and is even more expensive in other developing countries in Asia, but the same cup of coffee may only cost half that price in the US. The American coffee and chain company of Starbucks Corporation sets an example and explanation of how global hospitality companies can implement price discrimination.
Coffee is a worldwide cash crop of which demand has exponentially increased over the years. “Coffee is (after oil) the world’s second most important traded commodity” (Cleaver 61). Competing coffee brewing companies wage war on offering the freshest, best tasting coffee the market has to offer. With such stiff competition there must be enough coffee beans deemed to be good enough in quality to supply the increasing demand. Starbucks can be considered one of today’s top competitors if not thee top coffee manufacturer presently in business. This successful company has had a huge impact on the coffee industry as well as the world. They have gone through great length to provide consumers with an excellent product as well as create a legacy that shows how to best go about running a massive corporation while keeping the environment clean and healthy.
Starbucks is currently the industry leader in specialty coffee. They purchased more high quality coffee beans than anyone else in the world and keep in good standings with the producers to ensure they get the best beans. Getting the best beans is only the first part, Starbucks also has a “closed loop system” that protects the beans from oxygen immediately after roasting to the time of packaging. They did this through their invention of a one-way valve which let the natural gasses escape but keeping oxygen out. This gave them the unique ability to ensure freshness and extended the shelf life to 26 weeks. Starbucks isn’t only about the coffee, it’s also about a place where people can escape to enjoy music, reflect, read, or just chat. It is a total coffee experience. The retail outlet has been responsible for much of Starbucks growth and has contributed substantially to their brand equity.