Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
paragraph about jacques-louis david
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: paragraph about jacques-louis david
David was the virtual art dictator of France for a generation. Extending beyond painting, his influence determined the course of fashion, furniture design, and interior decoration and was reflected in the development of moral philosophy. His art was a sudden and decisive break with tradition, and from this break "modern art" is dated.
David studied with Vien, and after winning the Prix de Rome (which had been refused him four times, causing him to attempt suicide by starvation) he accompanied Vien to Italy in 1775. His pursuit of the antique, nurtured by his time in Rome, directed the classical revival in French art. He borrowed classical forms and motifs, predominantly from sculpture, to illustrate a sense of virtue he mistakenly attributed to the ancient Romans. Consumed by a desire for perfection and by a passion for the political ideals of the French Revolution, David imposed a fierce discipline on the expression of sentiment in his work. This inhibition resulted in a distinct coldness and rationalism of approach.
David's reputation was made by the Salon of 1784. In that year he produced his first masterwork, The Oath of the Horatii (Louvre). This work and his celebrated Death of Socrates (1787; Metropolitan Mus.) as well as Lictors Bringing to Brutus the Bodies of His Sons (1789; Louvre) were themes appropriate to the political climate of the time. They secured for David vast popularity and success. David was admitted to the Académie royale in 1780 and worked as court painter to the king.
As a powerful republican David, upon being elected to the revolutionary Convention, voted for the king's death and for the dissolution of the Académie royale both in France and in Rome. In his paintings of the Revolution's martyrs, especially in his Marat (1793; Brussels), his iron control is softened and the tragic portraits are moving and dignified. The artist was imprisoned for a time at the end of the Reign of Terror.
David emerged to become First Painter to the emperor and foremost recorder of Napoleonic events (e.g., Napoleon Crossing the Saint Bernard Pass, 1800; Coronation of Napoleon and Josephine, 1805–07; and The Distribution of the Eagles, 1810) and a sensitive portraitist (Mme Récamier, 1800; Louvre). In this period David reached the height of his influence, but his painting, more than ever the embodiment of ne...
... middle of paper ...
...ly to modern painting, is the martyr portrait of Jacobin leader Jean-Paul Marat, dead in his bath after being stabbed by Charlotte Corday.
The guillotine devoured many revolutionary leaders, and, indeed, David had declared he wanted to die with Robespierre, the principal architect of the Terror. But he survived, instead, and soon began fawning upon the young Napoleon. David was a turncoat and a sycophant, but a great painter. "He was born into a world in which painting was for the privileged few," Wilson writes. "His images showed the power of art to electrify even the commonest citizen."
Bibliography:
D. L. Dowd, Pageant-Master of the Republic (1948); J. Lindsay, Death of the Hero (1960); Warren Roberts, Jacques Louis David, Revolutionary Artist (1989).
Dorthy Johnson. Jacques-Louis David: The Art of Metamorphosis; Princeton University Press, November (1993)
Friedlander, W. F, From David to Delacroix, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, (1952)
Rosenblum R., Transformations in Late Eighteenth Century Art, Princeton University Press (1967)
L. Eitner, Neoclassicism and Romanticism, 1750-1850 Sources and Documents, Vol 1 Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1970
Thomson’s argument is presented in three components. The first section deals with the now famous violinist thought experiment. This experiment presents a situation in which you wake up one morning and discover you have been kidnapped and hooked up to an ailing violinist so that his body would have the use of your kidneys for the next nine months. The intuitive and instinctive reaction to this situation is that you have no moral duty to remain hooked up to the violinist, and more, that he (or the people who kidnapped you) does not have the right to demand the use of your body for this period. From a deontological point of view, it can be seen that in a conflict between the right of life of the fetus and the right to bodily integrity of the mother, the mother’s rights will trump those of the fetus. Thomson distills this by saying “the right to life consists not in the right not to be killed, but rather in the right not to be killed unjustly”.
Judith Jarvis Thomson, in "A Defense of Abortion", argues that even if we grant that fetuses have a fundamental right to life, in many cases the rights of the mother override the rights of a fetus. For the sake of argument, Thomson grants the initial contention that the fetus has a right to life at the moment of conception. However, Thomson explains, it is not self-evident that the fetus's right to life will always outweigh the mother's right to determine what goes on in her body. Thomson also contends that just because a woman voluntarily had intercourse, it does not follow that the fetus acquires special rights against the mother. Therefore, abortion is permissible even if the mother knows the risks of having sex. She makes her points with the following illustration. Imagine that you wake up one morning and find that you have been kidnapped, taken to a hospital, and a famous violist has been attached to your circulatory system. You are told that the violinist was ill and you were selected to be the host, in which the violinist will recover in nine months, but will die if disconnected from you before then. Clearly, Thomson argues, you are not morally required to continue being the host. In her essay she answers the question: what is the standard one has to have in order to be granted a right to life? She reflects on two prospects whether the right to life is being given the bare minimum to sustain life or ir the right to life is merely the right not to be killed. Thomson states that if the violinist has more of a right to life then you do, then someone should make you stay hooked up to the violinist with no exceptions. If not, then you should be free to go at a...
"National Gallery of Art." The Age of Watteau, Chardin, and Fragonard. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 May 2014.
In the Enseigne, art is also shown to serve a function that it has always fulfilled in every society founded on class differences. As a luxury commodity it is an index of social status. It marks the distinction between those who have the leisure and wealth to know about art and posses it, and those who do not. In Gersaint’s signboard, art is presented in a context where its social function is openly and self-consciously declared. In summary, Watteau reveals art to be a product of society, nevertheless he refashions past artistic traditions. Other than other contemporary painters however, his relationship to the past is not presented as a revolt, but rather like the appreciative, attentive commentary of a conversational partner.
David was always a type of person inclined to be melancholy. He was always a religious person. He made sure that he did everything right, because he was afraid of death. He performed all the duties of religion without a true conversion.2
In Judith Jarvis Thompson’s article “A Defense of Abortion” she explores the different arguments against abortion presented by Pro –Life activists, and then attempts to refute these notions using different analogies or made up “for instances” to help argue her point that women do have the right to get an abortion. She explains why abortion is morally permissible using different circumstances of becoming pregnant, such as rape or unplanned pregnancy.
The dissemblance of the First French Empire occurred when Napoleon lost against Great Britain’s navy in the battle of Waterloo in the year of 1815. Napoleon then abdicated his empire, and exiled to the island of Saint Helena, where he died in the year of 1821. When Napoleon abdicated, his “first painter” Jacques-Louis David was exiled too for political reasons, and later died when leaving France. Jacques-Louis David had painted The Emperor Napoleon in His Study at the Tuileries to reflect on the historical period when Napoleon was at the height of his career, and to truly propagandize his image to the world, as the hero of France. The simple background, the allusions to classical Greek and Roman culture, and the historical context of the painting clearly is presented in the style of Neoclassicism, while fashioning Napoleon as a great military leader.
The Renaissance Period is widely known for the abundance of amazing portraiture that circulated around Europe. During the Renaissance, Albrecht Dürer, a German artist painted a self-portrait in 1500 that had qualities that differed from the usual style of artist in that time (Chauhan). Jean Clouet also painted a portrait for the King of France and became the official court painter. Both artists had a talent for portraiture, while their styles were quite different. King Francis I wanted to be seen as a powerful man, and appointed Clouet to paint him in a classically renaissance way that highlights his wealth and authority. Dürer, described as a cocky, self-centered man, painted himself in a light that is unique and puts him on a ‘holy’ pedestal (Stokstad 356). In this essay I will show how although both paintings have clear differences with their style, both men in the compositions are conveyed in a great and very powerful sense.
...e open to all women at any point of pregnancy, and that the woman reserves the right as a fully conscious member of the moral community to choose to carry the child or not. She argues that fetuses are not persons or members of the moral community because they don’t fulfill the five qualities of personhood she has fashioned. Warren’s arguments are valid, mostly sound, and cover just about all aspects of the overall topic. However much she was inconsistent on the topic of infanticide, her overall writing was well done and consistent. Warren rejects emotional appeal in a very Vulcan like manner; devout to reason and logic and in doing so has created a well-written paper based solely on this rational mindset.
Thomson sets out to show that the foetus does not have a right to the mother’s body and that it would be not unjust to perform an abortion when the mother’s life is not threatened.
Some say that Marcel Duchamp, also known as Rrose Selavy, is one of the most influential artists of the 20th century. From a young age Duchamp was under a heavy influence of art. For instance, his grandfather “...practiced engraving…” (Lebel). Duchamp’s mother even painted landscapes. This resulted in, “Four of the six Duchamp children [becoming] artists.” (Lebel). Duchamp was influenced by his two older brothers who encouraged him to pursue art. He was also heavily influenced, in his early art stages, by, “...Paul Cezanne…” (Lebel). In 1906, Duchamp moved to Paris at the time when modernism was about to explode. “...[Duchamp] was part of the generation who were influenced and inspired by this revolution.” (Jones). When Duchamp reached the age of twenty five, he started getting influenced by the,”...theater adaptation of Raymond Roussel's Impressions d'Afrique with Picabia and Guillaume Apollinaire.” (“Marcel Duchamp Biography, Art, and Analysis of Works”). The plots of this story and the puns, which Duchamp used in many of his works, are what influenced him the most. He "’felt that as a painter it was much better to be influenced by a writer than by another painter.’" (“Marcel Duchamp Biography, Art, and Analysis of Works”). In this same year, 1911, Duchamp may have also been influenced by, “allusions to homosexual intercourse, Kabbalism and tantrism…” (Girst). Girst says this may have been the only work of art Duchamp
Thomson starts off her paper by explaining the general premises that a fetus is a person at conception and all persons have the right to life. One of the main premises that Thomson focuses on is the idea that a fetus’ right to life is greater than the mother’s use of her body. Although she believes these premises are arguable, she allows the premises to further her explanation of why abortion could be
I believe he thought it would be a great way to showcase his vision on art and his learning. This was his very first piece and he grew from it. Looking at the art work “David” I really see just a young man who overcame a big obstacle in his life that no one thought that he would over come.. In life every person have their own obstacle to get through. They only way to get through them is to size them up and slay them until they fall down. ‘David” really remind of the time when I was thought I was not going to go to upper state in track and Field. Track is my life. I love it. The season started off and my team and I was not doing so well. Our time were far off from last year. The coaches were very hard on us. All we could do was hold our head down because we thought we were not going to ever get back in shape in time of enough. Many of the other teams had been practicing year round, but we have a short three weeks to get real for just our first meet. Our first track meet was a totally blow and many of us did not place into the top of any event that we had. The odds were against us. We were persistent in achieving our goal. We could not give up, that was our main life line of thought. As time went by we got better and better. We practice on our hand offs, coming out of the blocks, endurance, and our jumps. We went to region we did not know what to expect. We just knew that we were going to go out there and give it our all.
A painting by David about the murder of Marat can symbolize the sense of individualism and rebellion against the terror. Marat was part of the rebellion in France, keeping the French under control through use of his communication news flyers that he published every week.
In Thomson’s “A Defense on Abortion,” she presents her pro-choice argument which is mainly supported by analogies called the violinist analogy, burglar analogy and the people seeds analogy. Firstly, she begins her argument with speaking about whether or not a fetus is a person from conception. This is the use of a pro- life argument that relates to a fetus being a person and how killing a person is wrong; therefore, killing a fetus is wrong. She willingly admits why she partially agrees with the premise of the fetus being a person. It is a belief that a human being has a right to life and if the fetus is a human being that means that the fetus also has a right to life. In Thomson’s argument, she is not arguing to disprove