It is Cleanthes who gets the ball rolling in Part II of Hume by laying out his “argument from design.” Cleanthes believes that there is ample evidence in the nature that surrounds us to draw conclusions on what God is like. Cleanthes compares the surrounding world as one great “machine.” He goes on to discuss how this “machine” is “subdivided into an infinite number of lesser machines, which again admit of subdivisions to a degree beyond what human senses and faculties can trace and explain.”(837) Cleanthes goes on to suggest that these “machines” are all adjusted to each other in such a way that it resembles the productions of man and human design. By this Cleanthes is saying that nature is organized much the same way as a machine built by man. He states this by saying “the Author of Nature is somewhat similar to the mind of man, though possessed of much larger faculties, proportioned to the grandeur of the work which he has executed.”(837) Cleanthes main emphasis is not the question of the intelligent designer itself, but rather that the designer similar to mankind. He makes his assumption concrete by saying “By this argument a posteriori, and by this argument alone, do we prove at once the existence of a Deity and his similarity to human mind and intelligence.”(837)
In other words Cleanthes believes that we need to look no further than this analogy to prove that God is similar to a human designer, only much more perfect due to the perfection we see in the system of nature.
It is this inference by Cleanthes that both Demea and Philo have problems with. In turn they spend the rest of Hume’s Dialogues rebutting Cleanthes claims. However, Demea and Philo do differ from each other on why they believe Cleanthes’ “argument from design” is flawed.
Demea firmly believes that God is so outside the realm of hu...
... middle of paper ...
Personally, after assessing all the information brought forth in Hume’s Dialogues I can only say that I agree more with Demea and Philo than I do with Cleanthes. It can be easily construed that Hume wrote these dialogues with the intent of portraying Philo as the victor, contrary to what Part XII might say. I must say that if I did believe in a supreme being I would have to side with Demea’s argument that we as humans cannot possibly comprehend God, or try to understand him through our reasoning. Further more, with respect to Cleanthes claims that God can be understood through out own surroundings, I have to disagree for most of the same reasons as Philo did. The concept of evil is virtually impossible for Cleanthes line of reasoning to overcome and is definitely the strongest argument against the “argument from design.” Over all I have to once again go back to Demea as being the overriding constant voice of dissent. His assertions of mans' inability to understand God, although simple, in my mind easily overrides all arguments put forth by Cleanthes.
Hume, David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. 1779. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, 1989.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion we are introduced to three characters that serve the purpose to debate God and his nature, more specifically, what can mankind infer about God and his nature. The three characters; Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes all engage in a debate concerning this question and they all serve the purpose of supporting their views on the subject. It is the “argument from design” put forth by Cleanthes that is the focal point of the discussion, and it is Demea and Philo who attempt to discredit it.... [tags: Hume Religious Essays]
1522 words (4.3 pages)
- In Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Part X, Philo have questioned how it is possible to reconcile God's infinite benevolence, wisdom, and power with the presence of evil in the world. “His power we allow is infinite: whatever he wills is executed: but neither man nor any other animal is happy: therefore he does not will their happiness. His wisdom is infinite: he is never mistaken in choosing the means to any end: but the course of Nature tends not to human or animal felicity: therefore it is not established for that purpose.” (Hume, 87) Given the presence of evil, we must either conclude that God wishes to prevent needless suffering, but cannot, in which case God is not all-pow... [tags: God, Deity]
685 words (2 pages)
- An Analysis of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion ABSTRACT: Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779) may be read in the way Cleanthes (and Philo as well) reads Nature, as analogous to human artifice and contrivance. The Dialogues and Nature then are both texts, with an intelligent author or Author, and analogies may be started from these five facts of Hume's text: the independence of Hume's characters; the non-straightforwardness of the characters' discourse; the way the characters interact and live; the entanglements of Pamphilus as an internal author; and the ways in which a reader is also involved in making a dialogue.... [tags: Philosophy]
4495 words (12.8 pages)
- In David Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and Voltaire’s Candide, both writers illustrate a world where humans are in a constant state of misery. In Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, three philosophers named Demea, Cleanthes, and Philo argue and debate on the existence and nature of God. During this argument, the question of evil and how it contradicts with God’s perfect benevolence is raised. Thus, Hume brings into discussion a much broader and deeper question than that of the existence and nature of a perfect, divine being.... [tags: Philosophy, Religion, Candide, Metaphysics]
1053 words (3 pages)
- David Hume’s “Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion” shields suicide while Emile Durkheim’s “Suicide and Modernity” unearths the causes. Durkheim and Hume label suicide differently because their perspectives varied from the moral structures in their positions. Their causative ideas of suicide are just as dissimilar as their definitions. One of the motives tied to suicide is morality; a topic that has powers vested in the justification and deconstruction of the act. Not only is morality a central subtopic, agency under Durkheim and Hume holds a strong position that affects the way suicide works.... [tags: David Hume, Emile Durkheim, Suicide]
1486 words (4.2 pages)
- Where does religion come from. Many have tried to answer this question, only leaving us with more questions than answers. This essay will focus on two philosophers David Hume and Karl Marx both has strong critiques on the existence of God. Both going against the design argument, the design argument is the argument for the existence of God or single creator; however, with Hume’s empiricist and Marx's atheist they both attack the design argument in different ways, ultimately coming to the same conclusion and that is there is no God.... [tags: religion]
1272 words (3.6 pages)
- Philo indicates in the first premise of his first argument of Part X, that the only way society was able to implement religion and a supreme Deity that would also build longevity, needed some sort of image of association. Philo is classified as a skeptic, he interjects that the idea of there being a God has no proof of existence through the sentiments of man that claim no real testimony of divine intervention of any higher intellect without using some sort of system. There is no order of cohesion that determines what should give sufficient enough reason for religion; but to implement such ideologies’ into existence would require some type of human characteristics (anthropomorphism).... [tags: philo, demea, cleanthes]
1149 words (3.3 pages)
- In Part II of David Hume’s Dialogues of Natural Religion, Demea remarks that the debate is not about whether or not God exists, but what the essence of God is. (pg.51) Despite this conclusion in Part II, in his introduction to the Dialogues Martin Bell remarks that the question of why something operates the way it does is quite different from the question why do people believe that it operates the way it does. (pg. 11) This question, the question of where a belief originates and is it a valid argument, is much of the debate between Hume’s three characters in the Dialogues.... [tags: Religion, Faith, Philosophy, Causality]
1190 words (3.4 pages)
- David Hume wrote Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding in 1748, right in the middle of the Enlightenment and on the eve of the Industrial and Scientific Revolution. So it only makes sense that some of the ideas and comparisons used are slightly outdated, but science, if anything, helps his argument regarding causality. Hume is ultimately concerned with the origins of causality, how we are able to gain knowledge from causality, and if we can even call the knowledge derived from causality real knowledge.... [tags: David Hume, Enlightenment]
1049 words (3 pages)
- In An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, David Hume demonstrates how there is no way to rationally make any claims about future occurrences. According to Hume knowledge of matters of fact come from previous experience. From building on this rationale, Hume goes on to prove how, as humans we can only make inferences on what will happen in the future, based on our experiences of the past. But he points out that we are incorrect to believe that we are justified in using our experience of the past as a means of evidence of what will happen in the future.... [tags: Philosophy Hume Philosophical Essays]
1020 words (2.9 pages)