Neo-Darwinism incorporates the discoveries of modern science into Darwin's original theory while leaving the basic beliefs intact. Darwin proposed that individuals with favorable traits are more likely to survive and reproduce. Darwin called this process natural selection. Darwin did not understand how or why variation existed. Today scientists realize that variation arises through random changes (called mutations) to existing genes. Genes are the chemicals that determine the traits and characteristics of animals and plants. Every trait has one or more gene associated with it. Thus, natural selection provides the animals and plants with the best genes. Supporters of neo-Darwinism believe that natural selection operating upon random variation gave rise rise to all animals and plants. While the source of variation is random, the direction of evolution is not. In effect, natural selection removes chance, and it makes the theory of evolution plausible. If neo-Darwinism is correct then numerous small successive changes guided by natural selection gave rise to all animals and plants.
I will prove that natural selection is not a creative process. Its primary function is to preserve the status quo. Thus, new structures and organs must arise through chance. Natural selection can only preserve and optimize these new structures and organs after they evolve through chance. In other words, natural selection does not drive evolution, and the hypothesis on which neo-Darwinism is based is flawed.
Natural selection drives microevolution. Microevolution is defined as evolution involving small changes. Microevolution does not require the evolution of new structures or organs, Therefore, microevolution does not involve the creation of new genes.
Changes to existing genes (mutations) result in variation. Natural
selection acts on this variation and preserves the best. So while the
variation may be random, the process of microevolution is not.
... middle of paper ...
...ific experiments can not test macroevolution, there is no direct evidence to suggest that the processes behind microevolution can also bring about the evolution of new structures or genes. In other words, microevolution should not be extended to support macroevolution.
While punctuated equilibria may save evolution from the fossil record, it cannot save the theory from the more serious flaws. For example, the success of evolution is based entirely upon the ability of scientists to use microevolution to justify macroevolution.
What is the difference between microevolution and macroevolution? Microevolution does not require new structures or organs. Macroevolution does. This implies that microevolution does not create new genes whereas macroevolution requires new genes.
Two things should be clear from the examples offered above:
1.) Microevolution can bring about very large changes.
2). It is easy to make the same mistake that Darwin made. That is microevolution can accomplish a lot, so why not use it to explain macroevolution?
For these reasons explained above, how can any person with a sound mind still believe in the outlandish fairy-tale that is called evolution?
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The man in history for his theory on natural selection and evolution, Charles Darwin, was born on February 12, 1809 (Johnson 17). His father ensured that he received the finest education available, which shaped him into the man and leader he turned out to be (Johnson 20). His adult years were centralized around intellectual matters that lead him to becoming a great and established thinker in the scientific world. Charles Darwin was an effective leader because of his intellectual influence and scientific relationships, his strategically written and published theory in Origin of Species, and the receptiveness of the Victorians.... [tags: Charles Darwin, Natural selection, Evolution]
1017 words (2.9 pages)
- Over the course of this analysis, I will use information from Gardner’s Changing Minds (Gardner, 2006) and Uzzi and Dunlap’s How to Build Your Network (Uzzi, 2005) to assess Charles Darwin’s influence as a non-positional leader. I will also show a historical analysis, including my reasons for choosing Darwin as my subject, his background, the success and failures of his influence, as well as his legacy. Finally, I will submit my vision of non-positional leadership and mechanisms for leaders to explore their non-positional roles.... [tags: Leadership ]
1429 words (4.1 pages)
- Charles Darwin is well-known for his groundbreaking work on evolutionary biology. Among his many contributions, The Origin of Species is the most associated with his name. He introduces the scientific theory of evolution and suggests that species have evolved over a period of many generations through a process called natural selection. Darwin's theories have created much controversy among his colleagues and led to great amounts of debate. However, the massive amount of criticism directed at Darwin convinced him to make to revisions.... [tags: genes, selection, survival]
1295 words (3.7 pages)
- Charles Darwin’s theory and evolution Introduction: Charles Darwin was an English scientist who developed the theory of evolution which had been around for long period of time which gave him fame during his life and after his death. In 1859, he published a book called Origin of Species which contains all the theory of evolution. Darwin’s theory caused a lot of argument and they are still continuing until these days. In religion view it caused clash because at that time people in Europe believed that God had created the whole world in 7 days according to the Bible.... [tags: hereditary, variation, selection principles]
1371 words (3.9 pages)
- In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, a new way of thinking resulted from the Scientific Revolution. It was an important time in which many people turned away from the church and looked towards logic and reason for the answers to questions about life, death, and the universe. The Scientific Revolution was the key to new discoveries and it allowed many scientists such as Charles Robert Darwin to continue thinking and striving for the truth as other scientists, such as Galileo and Newton, had done before him.... [tags: Natural Selection, Evolution Essays]
1076 words (3.1 pages)
- In an article by Axel Bugge two opinions on what should happen to the Amazon are discussed. One view is that it’s more important to cut down the Amazon due to the growing number of people living in Brazil. The other more vocal side wants to stop any cutting down of the Amazon but at least wants to minimize the amount that is being cut down every year. They don’t want to lose the Amazon that is nicknamed “the lungs of the planet” for all the oxygen that comes from there (Bugge 1). The Brazilian authorities and large percent of Brazilians know that they should limit the amount of Amazon that is being cut down.... [tags: Amazon Rain Forest]
577 words (1.6 pages)
- There are many feminist theories and each of them is informed by different sources. There is overlap of where various feminists get to their conclusions but there continues to be unending variations. Griet Vandermassen the author of Who’s Afraid of Charles Darwin?: Debating Feminism and Evolutionary Theory seeks to draw feminists attention towards science as a new source of information to help understand women’s roles and to reinforce women’s rights to equality. She outlines her intentions and her reasons for the book and follows it with an exhaustive argument.... [tags: Women's Rights ]
2652 words (7.6 pages)
- Was Darwinism Socialist. For much of the twentieth century, the works of Charles Darwin were associated with their misuse In 1900, the pioneering Italian socialist sociologist Enrico Ferri wrote that it was impossible not to see a link between Darwinian evolution and societal progress. To Ferri, evolution of man and beast was natural, constant, and unavoidable. To him, this meant that the “evolution” of European society must also be. Ferri 's bold proclamation that humanity could evolve into a higher state of being represented an intellectual apex within a much larger mode of left-wing thought.... [tags: Charles Darwin, Natural selection]
935 words (2.7 pages)
- Stephen Jay Gould (1941-2002) was a paleontologist and his technical research was in the field of evolutionary biology. Steven Gould along with Niles Eldredge developed the theory of punctuated equilibrium ("Stephen Jay Gould"). This theory is a revision of Darwinian theory. Darwinian theory suggests that evolution change occurs slowly over time. The theory of punctuated equilibrium speculated that evolutionary changes does not occur slowly, but rather in rapid bursts over short periods of time; short as in: thousands of years; which are then followed by long periods of time where organisms undergo little, to no, further changes.... [tags: Natural selection, Charles Darwin, Evolution]
1368 words (3.9 pages)
- In 1900, the pioneering Italian socialist sociologist Enrico Ferri wrote that it was impossible not to see a link between Darwinian evolution and societal progress. To Ferri, evolution of man and beast was natural, constant, and unavoidable. To him, this meant that the “evolution” of European society must also be. But Ferri 's bold proclamation that humanity could evolve into a higher state of being was not unique. It was a clear summary of a much larger mode of left-wing ninteenth-century thought.... [tags: Charles Darwin, Natural selection, Evolution]
2223 words (6.4 pages)