Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
platos theory of forms
philosophy of Plato about death
platos theory of forms
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: platos theory of forms
Plato’s “Defense of Socrates” follows the trial of Socrates for charges of corruption of the youth. His accuser, Meletus, claims he is doing so by teaching the youth of Athens of a separate spirituality from that which was widely accepted. Socrates’ argument was unique in that he tried to convince the jury he was just an average man and not to be feared, but in actuality demonstrated how clever and tenacious he was. He begins with an anecdote of his visit to the Oracle of Delphi, which told him that there was no man smarter than he. He, being as humble as he is, could not take the Oracle’s answer for granted and went about questioning Athenians he felt surpassed his intelligence. However, in questioning politicians, poets, and artisans, he found that they claimed to know of matters they did not know about. Socrates considered this to be a serious flaw, and, as Bill S. Preston, Esq. put it: that “true wisdom consists in knowing that you know nothing.” Socrates acknowledges the fact that he knows nothing, at least in areas which he is unlearned in. By knowing this, he has obtained true wisdom, according to the above maxim. So, in essence, he maintains that he is not a smart man, but the Oracle was not flawed in its testimony. Socrates argues that he could not have intentionally corrupted Athenian youth through two premises: The first being that he would certainly not want to live amongst ...
Many judges and civilians questioned the intentions of Socrates. They believed he was corrupting their youth and making them go against the beliefs they had been taught by the law, their state and their parents. The intent of questioning and cross-examination, which Socrates often did, was not to make people feel inferior but to make them understand the shallowness of their knowledge. Being skilled in one area, Socrates believed, does not make you wise in all tings. You must be willing to explore and desire a deeper understanding of all things. Socrates wanted Meletus to understand that he was not trying to corrupt the youth or make them deny the gods of the state, but rather, “believe in divine and spiritual agencies” that encourage virtue and doing good to all men. Socrates believed that one should not fear death and punishment if they are doing what they believe to be good, and a person cannot make themselves better by accusing, punishing, or killing a person who questions their knowledge and beliefs. They only way to improve ourselves is by taking what our accusers say about us and digging into the meaning of it. By doing this we can search for understanding and try to make ourselves better. As Socrates says, “the life which is unexamined is not worth living.”
Socrates begins his defense by acknowledging that many people have accused him of “studying things in the sky and below the earth” and of “making the worse into the stronger argument” and teaching these things to others (p. 26). He replies that such accusations are “slanders”; the truth, he continues, is that he does not claim to have any special knowledge of anything in the sky or elsewhere. In support of this, Socrates relates the story of the Oracle at Delphi. The Oracle, who was thought to give voice to the Greek god Apollo, had told Socrates’ friend Chirephon that no man was wiser than Socrates. Surprised by this, Socrates surmises that the only reason the god said this is that Socrates seems to know only that he does not know very much. This, Socrates explains, makes him unlike most other people he meets, who “think [they] kno...
In “The Apology of Socrates,” Socrates shares his view of his fellow Athenian citizens; he accuses these citizens of caring more about their wealth and reputation than about wisdom, truth, and the state of their souls. Socrates deems “wisdom, truth, or the best possible state of your souls” to be more important to a meaningful life. One of the reasons Socrates is on trial is because he is accused of corrupting the youth. When roaming the streets, after being called the man with the most wisdom, he begins to ask all the smartest people he can find to ask them questions. He begins to realize that the people in power are not that smart after all. Socrates comes to the conclusion that the people with power and reputation have essentially denied to themselves that they do not know, and pretended that they do. This led to the idea of Socratic Wisdom, which is basically knowing that you do not know. This idea of putting reputation over truth and wisdom is very much still prevalent today, and could even be considered human nature.
Socrates does not believe the oracle. He acknowledges that he is not wise at all and decides to challenge. He decided to question three groups which were politicians, poets, and the craftsmen. He found that each group believed to be wise themselves and had a great deal of knowledge in other areas which they don’t. Its seems as if they were overcome with ignorance and pride. Socrates conclude that it is wise to not know rather than thinking we know
“At last, you have found me,” said the strange old man in a deep swift. He then began to undrape himself from his black scarfing, just to the point where his foreface was visible. “I have invited you here today to inform you of this atrocity that is happening to my friend, it would be a disservice to him if I did not inform you of what’s happening to him. I know that you have not spoken to or seen him in a while, but madam, your Socrates is about to be tried for poisoning the youth of Athens. By poison, he has developed a following where he has convinced the youth to not believe in the same Gods as the city does, and
A. Under trial for corrupting youth and not worshiping the Gods in Athens, Socrates takes an attitude that many might interpret as pompous during his trial. Rather than apologise, as Plato’s dialogue title Apology suggests, Socrates explains why he is right and those who accused him are mistaken. He speaks in a plain manner, as if the jury is just another of his followers. Socrates first cites the profit at Delphi for why he behaves in ways that lead to him being under scrutiny of the law. He explains that his friend, Chaerephon, went to ask the oracle if anyone is wiser than Socrates and the oracle responded no (21a). Socrates then explains his interpretation of this being that he is wise in knowing that he does not know certain things, where
In modern society, wisdom can be defined as the quality of having experience, knowledge, and moral judgment; the quality of being wise. However, Socrates had the idea that wisdom was knowing oneself. Socrates’s was beyond brilliant compared to the average Athenian; he was self-aware and just. Although Socrates tended to meddle in the affairs of others, he consequently had the ability to spark enlightenment among the people in Athens. To Socrates, philosophy served as the study of humans. He highlights this in The Apology when he goes from one social group to the next in search for the wisest of all the land. This is of course in response to the Oracle of Delphi addressing the fact that Socrates presents himself as the wisest of the entire known world. This was dangerous since Socrates dared to challenge the Oracle by trying to demonstrate he was not the wisest. Through this, however, Socrates learns that he was the wisest because he could admit that he did not have knowledge in all subjects; he could explicitly declare that he has not achieved ultimate knowledge of everything, unlike most Athenians.
In his defense, Socrates claims over and again that he is innocent and is not at all wise, “…for I know that I have no wisdom, small or great.” Throughout the rest of his oration he seems to act the opposite as if he is better than every man, and later he even claims that, “At any rate, the world has decided that Socrates is in some way superior to other men.” This seems to be his greatest mistake, claiming to be greater than even the jury.
According to Athenians, Socrates, a Greek philosopher, was corrupting the younger generations with his ideas. In a society where worshipping anything besides the Olympian Gods was considered illegal, Socrates was a threat. Socrates’ ideas were beyond what the Athenians already knew or thought they knew, and this led them to become defensive against Socrates. Through Plato’s Apology, readers are able to understand how Athenians lived back then, and what the popular ideas and beliefs were. The importance of religion in Athenian society is highlighted by the accusations of the Athenian council against Socrates, the laws are thoroughly laid out when Socrates is sentenced, and the significance of one’s place in the society’s social structure is
In the Apology, Socrates examines the charges brought against him by Meletus and tries to prove that they are false. The first charge brought against him is that he was corrupting the youth. Socrates responds to this by asking Meletus in his opinion, how Socrates was corrupting the youth. Meletus says that Socrates was teaching the youth to go against the government. Socrates asks if there was anyone who was beneficial for the youth. Meletus says that the council, jury, assembly, even the general public was beneficial to the youth and that Socrates was the only person corrupting them. Socrates claims that it was impossible for the one person to be capable of corrupting the youth when they had so many to show them in the right direction.
During Socrates’ life on earth, he challenged traditional thinking in an honest, down to earth way and set the fundamentals of modern western philosophy. However, meletus, a young, egotistical person with the goal to destroy Socrates’ life for “corrupting the yout,” condemned him to death. Conversely, Meletus was actually the person who corrupted the youth for two obvious reasons; he is ignorant and careless.
Thus Socrates began to believe that he was the wisest person in the city. The oracle was a turning point in his life. Instead of focusing on astronomical and physical studies, he began to concern himself with moral and political opinions: “this turn to the examination of opinions brought Socrates into conflict with the city as such, for his doubt of the worth of generally accepted opinions was also a challenge to the most authoritative opinions, those which concern the city’s gods and the city’s laws…”(18). The fact that Socrates knew he was the wisest and that he began to concern himself with philosophies of the city shows that he saw himself as the most important teacher in the city.
His last request was for the ones who convicted him to punish his sons, if they ever grow up putting their own interest of wealth instead of their goodness of other’s including their virtue. This request goes hand in hand with Socrates mission in life from the Gods, which was “to examine his fellow citizens and persuade them that the most important good for a human being was the health of the soul” (Socrates II. Priority Care of the Soul). Meaning that, living as a law-bidding citizen and respecting society made you a better person, which is healthy for the soul. By taking it upon himself to take care of the City of Athens, Socrates wanted to make Athenians “…law-abiding, more efficacious in their chosen work, more prudent or moderate, and more self-controlled” (Xenophon 2. Xenophon’s Socrates). By doing so, Socrates portrays the city as a horse who is in need of guidance to water, during his trial in court. Since the city is in need of someone to guide it to “water”, Socrates infers as himself as the guidance Athens needs. By using the metaphor of leading a horse to water Socrates shows that he was not corrupting the youth but instead being an attribution to the city of Athens. Also, by asking the jury to punish his sons if they lose their virtue he is further implying the ethics in which he lives by. Furthermore, since Socrates was law-biding and moderate, he was following the mission the Gods gave him of guiding the city of Athens, making him the wisest among men. This is because as the definition of wisdom sates, a man has to have good judgment and certain principles to acquire knowledge; furthermore strengthening Socrates
Socrates claimed to the jury that didn’t matter, hence he was doing what the oracle required of him, he was simply doing what the gods wanted him to do. While he is talking, he is justifying himself to the jury, so he mentioned that in the process of testing the wisdom of those who thought as themselves wise, a group of rich young men who seemed to get a kick of Socrates making fools of their elder began following him and in effect began imitating him. This made people angry, for is one thing for Socrates to go around making fools of everyone he talked to, but for a young man to do it, was just insolence, therefore Socrates was charged with corrupting the youth which leads to unjust blame placed on him for him himself never asked to be imitated. So, this concludes Socrates defense against his old
When Socrates was brought to trial for the corruption of the city’s youth he knew he had done nothing wrong. He had lived his life as it should be lead, and did what he ne...