Both detectives held a gun, but neither of them could shoot at Richards. The gunman was hiding closely behind his hostage and exposing little of his body to them.
Smith knew he couldn't risk a shot. There were too many people in the tavern, and most of them were behind Richards. He might hit one of them if he missed the gunman. And he probably would miss. The target being offered to him was much too small.
Smith glanced at his partner, Mary Scott. She was a very good shot. She was capable of hitting a small target at this range. She was the department's pistol champion, and she could consistently hit a quarter at thirty feet with the gun she carried.
But she was in an awkward position at the moment. There were several people between her and Richards. She needed time to get around them. But she was slowly weaving her way through the crowd and moving closer to the ex-con who was holding a gun to the old man's head. If she could get into a better position, and if Richards gave her even the smallest target, she would put him down. Smith realized that he had to buy her some time. He had to keep Richards occupied until she was in the clear. He spoke soothingly to the gunman. "Richards, you've killed one man already tonight. Don't make it worse by doing it again."
"That wiseguy had it coming," Richards responded. "If he hadn't made me mad, I wouldn't have killed him."
"Maybe we can make a deal," Smith said. "If you surrender now, I'll tell the judge that you said you did it only because you were angry."
"No," Richards shouted. "No deals. If I have any business with you, it'll be to blow you away."
Smith glanced at his partner again. She needed only a few more seconds. "Richards, we don't want to shoot you, we only want to help you. Tell me how we can do that."
"Just let me take a shot at you. If you'll let me do that without shooting back, I'll be satisfied."
When Mary Scott reached the pool table, she looked at Richards. She was now within ten feet of him, and no one stood between them except the hostage. She assessed her chances of hitting Richards at that range. It would be easy if only a little more of his head was showing. But he wasn't exposing his head to her, and that's where she had to place the shot. If she hit him anywhere else, he might pull the trigger before he died. If he did that, the old man would als...
... middle of paper ...
... He looked at her again. The same blank stare was on her face, but her mind was filled with thoughts of Smith's body.
Richards started to say something, but the Smith and Wesson spoke before he did. It delivered its message with a deafening roar. Six times an angry, orange flame exploded at the muzzle of her gun, and six times it spat death and the stink of burning cordite. For thirteen long seconds the gunfire lasted, and during that eternity of sound and flame, Mary's tortured mind could see the gates of hell swing open, swallow up a waiting figure, and then rumble closed again.
And then it was over. The nightmare stopped, but things were not as they'd been before. Samuel Richards still sat against the wall, but when her gun fell silent and the echoes died away, Samuel Richards's world had ended. He didn't see the flashlight beam that fell on the face of Mary Scott, and he heard none of the words the officers yelled when they recognized her.
The empty pistol hung at her side when the uniformed men arrived. She had dropped the flashlight and was now staring at the lifeless flesh before her. In her mind, she had carried out a fair and just sentence to this cruel murderer.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Since 1976 over 1350 people have been executed in the United States (Facts about the Death Penalty). In 1985 Edward Koch published an article on the New Republic discussing the death penalty. Serving 22 years in public service as a district leader, councilman, congressman, and mayor, Edward Koch has heard all the pros and cons of the death penalty (4). With that knowledge and experience Mr. Koch begins discussing, as well as promoting the death penalty. The arguments used against the death penalty range from religious concerns such as “Thou shalt not kill” (12), to more in-depth government related attacks like the death penalty being used as a state sanctioned murder.... [tags: punishment, murder, ignorance]
558 words (1.6 pages)
- Specific Comments: Pg1, P1, L4 - Because “The SAT” alone is a fragmented sentence, I would consider that you link it with the sentence before it so that it reads “tradition: the SAT”. This would both be grammatically correct and maintain the flow of the piece. Pg1, P1, L4-6 - In my opinion, I feel as though this sentences read a bit awkwardly and would benefit from some slight restructuring. It seemed a little confusing to what the “intelligence” was referring to, and clarification seems necessary for the reader.... [tags: Grammar, Word, Phrase, Sentence]
1697 words (4.8 pages)
- If we are still to attach a degree of culpability to those guilty of a ‘mercy killing’ then perhaps the best approach to follow is that currently undertaken in New Zealand. Here, there is a relaxation of the mandatory life sentence for those guilty of a ‘mercy killing’. As established in the Sentencing Act 2002 ‘An offender who is convicted of murder must be sentenced to imprisonment for life unless, given the circumstances of the offence and the offender, a sentence of imprisonment for life would be manifestly unjust’ .... [tags: Murder, Life imprisonment, Criminal law]
946 words (2.7 pages)
- 1. Theft Theft is the intentional taking of someone else’s property dishonestly without the owner’s consent. Theft requires the physical elements to be supported by fault, whereby the accused either intends to deprive the property’s owner permanently, or seriously impinge on the owner’s proprietary rights. Deception Deception is the intentional use of false representations by an individual through words or conduct; in order to dishonestly obtain an unfair advantage for self or another by inducing the victim to transfer a benefit or inflict a detriment upon the victim.... [tags: Australian criminal law]
913 words (2.6 pages)
- Is our justice system fair to all. Although the answer to this question is an opinion, there are pieces of evidence and commentary to defend this argument. The process of the legal system itself is all an opinion because in the end, the only person whose judgments matter is the judge himself. Over time, the wrong people have been arrested for the wrong things. Living in the United States, a country where crimes are committed constantly; we count on this system to make the right decisions.... [tags: racism, inequality]
1191 words (3.4 pages)
- ... This creates a sentencing inversion.” With the discretion of the judges included in the sentencing process, the offenders will get the sentence equal to the crime they committed. A job of a judge is to determine the sentence for an offender that will be fair and just. Through the establishment of this law, judges cannot add their input for when there is extreme circumstances, but the offenders must serve the time attributed to the crime committed. One of the more serious problem with mandatory minimum sentences is that they have a disparate effect on non-White offenders.... [tags: drugs, sentence, judges, severity, laws]
2895 words (8.3 pages)
- Explain sentencing and the theories behind it. Include the sentencing models and how they are supposed to work. The main purpose of sentencing is to punish the offender and to set a precedent to deter others from doing the same. The five main purposes of sentencing are the deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, rehabilitation, and restorative justice. The sentencing model states that judges and juries evaluate the guilt of the offender. To being with, sentencing has to be fair and cannot discriminate on factors of race, gender.... [tags: Crime, Criminal law, Prison, Sentence]
1417 words (4 pages)
- Life is not fair-Get used to it (Bill Gate) Life is not fair. We have all heard that from someone at some point in our lives. Life is not fair because there is no certainty of what is going to happen in the future. Life awards and punishes people hazardously. Life is like a picture drawn by an unknown painter and one is just a tiny part of it. Pictures can always deceive a person about what their real meaning is. Lie, appearances, contradictions, colors, conformity and people are just decoration in the overall interpretation of the picture.... [tags: Justice Fairness]
1688 words (4.8 pages)
- This topic is a very controversial one. The paper you are about to read could cause intense arguments between some groups of people. All that doesn’t matter to me because when you finish reading this, you will agree with me if you don’t already. First off, many people consider the electric chair cruel and unusual punishment. What I don’t get is that people think this even though in order to be eligible to get sentenced to the electric chair, they have to be proven guilty of killing someone. Don’t you think that is cruel and unusual punishment.... [tags: Death Penalty, Capital Punishment]
413 words (1.2 pages)
- My Fair Lady Introduction My paper will cover the 3 theoretical perspectives in the film My Fair Lady. I will explain each perspective and after give a few examples from the movie itself accordingly to the perspective they belong in. When I did these analyses the major thing that I noticed was how much inequality there is in this world. I think the symbolic interactionism fits best for this movie because through this movie most of the people relied on personal interactions with each other and not institutions.... [tags: movie analysis]
2009 words (5.7 pages)