The struggle against sickness and disease is not over, yet medical progress is being
threatened by activists who would end the use of laboratory animals in the search for treatment and cures. Their well financed anti-research disinformation campaign is not the only weapon used by animal rights activists.
The more extreme animal rights activists have used tactics of intimidation and terrorism,
April 26,1997, activists were arrested when they tried to force their way into Yerkes
Regional Primate center during a protest.
July 21,1997, The Animal Liberation Front (ALF) set fire to Cavel West, a horse rendering
July 5,1998, The ALF broke into a laboratory at Cornell University and released dozens of
woodchucks into the wild. (Americans for Medical Progress 2) These are only a few examples of intimidation and terrorism that activists use to get their point
across. The animals used in those labs were all for ideal laboratory animal research.
They were not being used for cosmetic studies. They were strictly being used for medical purposes. Some things that they were in research for were to study liver cancer, hepatitis, and to get tissues to treat skull born birth defects in children.
In order to decide whether these actions taken by activists are right or appropriate we
need to answer this question: Are the benefits of animal experimentation worth the pain that the laboratory animal experiences? Once this question is answered, the question of whether animal experimentation is ethical or not will also be answered.
The use of animals in the life sciences goes back to ancient Greece and the earliest
medical experiments. To learn about swallowing, ancient physicians cut open the throat of a living pig. To study the heart they cut into its chest. For centuries, physicians and researchers used animals to enhance their knowledge about how the various organs and systems of the body functioned, as well as to improve their surgical skills. As this knowledge grew, new scientific disciplines were born. First physiology, and pharmacology, and much later bacteriology, and immunology evolved as animal experimentation became more widespread. Table 2 depicts the great leaps animal experimentation has provided to the human race. This timeline is proof of
great advances gained from animal tes...
... middle of paper ...
...Benefit From Biomedical Research.”
http:www.pirweb.org/animals_do_benefit.htm(15, Feb. 2000).
Partners in Research. “The History of Biomedical Research.”
http://www.pirweb.org/history.htm (15, Feb. 2000).
Phillips-Conroy, Jane E. “Field Primatology and Biomedical Research.” SCIENCE 284
Sabin, Heloisa. “Animal Research Saves Human Lives.” The Wall Street Journal (18,
Scientific American. “Animal Research Is Vital to Medicine.”
http://www.sciam.com/0297/issue/0297botting.html (16, Feb. 2000).
Scientific American. “Animal Research Is Wasteful and Misleading.”
http://www.sciam.com.0297.issue.0297barnard.html (16, Feb. 2000).
Scientific American. “The Numbers of Research Animals.”
http://www.sciam.com/0297issue/0297/trendsbox.html (16, Feb. 2000).
Seachrist, Lisa. “Lab Rats Still Not Animals.” SCIENCE 264 (1994): 1533.
Wadman, Meredith. “Bid to Give Legal Protection to Laboratory Mice In US.” Nature
393 (1998): 6.
Wadman, Meredith. “Legal Bid Could Extend US Animal Welfare Law to Cover Lab Rodents.” Nature 400 (1999): 197- 98.
Wadman, Meredith. “Population Explosion Raises Alarm Over Lab Animal Health.” Nature 391 (1998): 623.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The major ancient philosophers, Thomas Aquinas and Rene Descartes, argue that animals lack a moral status because they do not engage in rational thought, are not conscious, and do not behave morally (Wilson, 2001). However, contrary to their beliefs, non-human animals do display the characteristics that Aquinas and Descartes claim qualifies humans for a moral status. In this paper, I will argue that animals should have an equal moral status to that of humans. This is due to the lack of relevant differences between humans and animals in the areas of thinking rationally, having a conscience, and behaving morally.... [tags: Ethical Issues, Animal Ethics]
2305 words (6.6 pages)
- Each year, more than twenty five million animals are used for scientific research in the U.S. More than ninety percent of those are mice (Ericson para 1). The Institute for Laboratory Animal Research of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences argues that even sophisticated computers are unable to model interactions between molecules, cells, tissues, organs, organisms and the environment, as well as animals, making animal research necessary in many areas. Animal studies have been used in the past and shall continue to be used in the future for a number of applications in the field of orthopedics.... [tags: Animal Testing]
926 words (2.6 pages)
- The moral status of animals is an issue of much debate in Science. According to The Royal Society, the oldest scientific academy nowadays, it would have been impossible for science and medicine to develop so without animal research (“The Use of Non-Human Animals in Research”, 2004). Nevertheless, do the human medical benefits really justify the animal suffering in animal research. If so, what should are the possible considerations and limitations related to the matter. It appears to be a challenge to find common ground concerning the above questions.... [tags: animals, suffering, health, experimentation, moral]
1540 words (4.4 pages)
- Animal research, or animal testing, is the use of animals in scientific researches to study and develop drugs for the life-taking diseases that human beings contract. It has been practiced for hundreds of years. Animal testing helps produced many vaccines and other drugs, like penicillin, and thus, save many human lives. On the other hand, animal testing also causes pain and kills a lot of animals used during the researches that many people oppose this practice. Supporters show their support, while opponents show their oppositions toward this controversial issue that is still in debates today.... [tags: Biology Medical Biomedical Animal Testing]
1403 words (4 pages)
- Millions of animals die each year in the United States due to animal testing. Animals are used in laboratories to test chemicals in products and also used in research for the study of diseases such as cancer and AIDS. Unfortunately, these animals suffer tremendously while being experimented on and afterwards they are commonly put to death. The government has established legislation which gives certain guidelines for animal in laboratories, but it does not apply to every animal. The government even requires certain animal experimentation on specific products such as pesticides.... [tags: Science Product Expirament Animal Rights]
1767 words (5 pages)
- Ethics of Animal Research One of the many issues of today's conversations is still confusing on my understanding it. Is it ethical for people to engage in animal research for human excellence. And if so, just how far can animal research be taken to meet these achievements for human kind. When thinking about this, I would conclude that animals over human beings do not have any rights what so ever, but I would be the biggest hypocrite in the world by saying this due to believing my doggy (Frankey) has rights in our household.... [tags: Papers]
532 words (1.5 pages)
- The Ethics of Xenotransplantation 1. Introduction to Xenotransplantation Xenotransplantation is the process of taking cells, parts of organs, or even whole organs from one species of animal, and implanting them into another species. The FDA has given their own definition of xenotransplantation which they say is “any procedure that involves the transplantation, implantation, or infusion into a human recipient of either live cells, tissues, or organs from a non human animal source, or human body fluids, cells, tissues or organs that have had ex vivo contact with live non human animal cells, tissues or organs.” The main interest of the practice is to be able to take organs from animals for t... [tags: Morals Science Biology Essays]
1603 words (4.6 pages)
- Web-Based Issue Position Statement Introduction The use of laboratory animals in the classroom is an extremely controversial issue. Ethics as well as religion are challenged with the dissection of animals. This controversy is not a new one, animal dissection has been disputed for well over a hundred years (National Research Council, 1988). There have been numerous court cases concerning this issue and laws have been enacted to give students the right to refrain from participating in animal dissection (NABT, 1990).... [tags: Essays Papers]
989 words (2.8 pages)
- Code of Ethics In order to make certain that the animals are treated in a humane and ethical way, researchers are regulated and monitored by various government agencies. The US Department of Agriculture is responsible for enforcing the Animal Welfare Act and conducts unannounced inspections of research facilities. If the research is a grant recipient, the National Institutes of Health would be responsible for the regulation as well. The American Association for the Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) is responsible for setting the standards for research institutions.... [tags: Papers]
790 words (2.3 pages)
- Ethics of Genetic Engineering Within the last two decades scientists have developed several new techniques, which manipulate and alter the genes found in the cells of living organisms. This wonder of the century, genetic engineering has turned heredity --the passing of inheritable characteristics from parent to off spring- from a natural, random event into a process that can be artificially controlled and exploited. It has the potential of giving humanity unprecedented power over life itself, and it has thus raised profound questions in such diverse areas as the environment, agriculture, biological warfare, and animal rights.... [tags: Papers]
639 words (1.8 pages)