A whirlwind of controversy arose in November 2002, when Judge Ted Poe, ruled that PBS’s Frontline could film jury deliberations in the trial of Cedric Harrison, 17, who faces the death penalty for allegedly killing a man during a car-jacking. In validating his ruling, Poe held that “cameras in courts keep the system honest” and are an important tool for civic education.1 Poe approved Frontline’s proposal, in which an unobtrusive ceiling camera would be used and no full-time cameraman would be necessary. Frontline had planned to edit the deliberations and broadcast them approximately one year following the verdict as part of a two-to-three hour documentary that would spotlight Harris County, whose juries have sentenced more people to death than juries in any other county in the U.S.2
Opinions regarding potential camera usage are starkly divided between the Harrison camp and the prosecution. Harrison, his mother, and his lawyers are in favor of the filming, and all signed waivers saying they would not use the film on appeal or to seek a new trial. Conversely, the prosecution, lead by District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal, appealed to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for the banning of the cameras on grounds that the prospect of being filmed could influence the jury’s selection and its deliberation.
By custom—not by law—trial jury deliberations traditionally are secret in Texas. The use of cameras in courthouses has been left to the discretion of judges. Deliberations in criminal cases have been taped before, but never in a capital punishment case. Texas law mandates grand jury deliberations be secret, but there is no such statute regarding trial juries. ...
... middle of paper ...
...s.census.gov/qfd/states/48000.html> (22 May 2004).
5. <http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cp01.pdf> (22 May 2004).
6. Jeffrey J. Pokorak. “Probing the Prosecutor's Perspective: Race of the
Discretionary Actors.” Cornell Law Review 83 (1998): 6+.
7. Baldus, D. et al. “Race Discrimination and the Death Penalty in the Post
Furman Era: An Empirical and Legal Overview with Preliminary Findings from
Philadelphia.” Cornell Law Review 83 (1998): 1638-1770.
8. <http://academic.udayton.edu/race/03justice/death02.htm> (22 May 2004).
9. <http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/glance/tables/drracetab.htm (22 May 2004).
10. Adam Liptak. “Inviting TV Into Jury Room in a Capital Case,” New York Times, 26
November 2002, sec. A.
11. <http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org> (May 23, 2004).
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In the beginning of the semester when we were handed this trial without knowing this was the one we would be viewing in class, I noticed that my initial verdict from then was drastically different than my final verdict after watching the trial. After viewing the trial I realized that the details and evidence that was presented in the article we were given was one sided to favor the prosecutors. I believe that it is important for me to discuss my view of this trial, my verdict and my reasoning for why I believe in my decision.... [tags: Jury, Hung jury, Deliberation, Verdict]
1431 words (4.1 pages)
- The presence of a jury in our legal system today is to create a sense of democracy in our society, as the presence of a jury avoids the possibility of corruption, similar to the idea of separate power, it is to assure that no one has enough power to abuse it. The right to a jury will ensure that those who are accused will get as close to a fair sentence as possible. The assigned book stated “the jury’s primary purpose is to protect citizens against arbitrary governmental actions by providing the accused a safeguard against the corrupt or overzealous prosecutor and against the compliant, biased or eccentric judge.” Jury nullification is defined by the assigned textbook as “ the right of juri... [tags: Jury, Voir dire, Not proven, Verdict]
1189 words (3.4 pages)
- The right to trial by jury in the modern times originates from twelfth century England during the reign of King Henry II. This system may originate from an “ancient right for an accused to be tried only “by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land”” (Thomas). In the United States, trial by jury is mentioned in Article Three of the Constitution and the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments. For many people, the jury system seems to be the fairest system and most unbiased way of determining a person’s innocence or guilt.... [tags: Trial by Jury ]
1395 words (4 pages)
- A jury has the right to reach a verdict they feel is proper even if it contradicts the law. If a jury feels that the outcome of a trial is unjust they can exercise their right of jury nullification. The doctrine of jury nullification states that “jurors have the inherent right to set aside the instructions of the judge and to reach a verdict of acquittal based upon their own consciences.” In other words, it states the jury has the right to judge the ethics of the law in any case if they choose. Jury Nullification most commonly appears in criminal law cases and originates from principles found in the Magna Carta.... [tags: Jury, Law, Jury nullification, John Peter Zenger]
845 words (2.4 pages)
- Media Deliberation “Ok ladies now let’s get in formation” are the words we heard at this year’s 50th Super Bowl halftime show, sung by singer Beyoncé’. As she sang and danced the crowd went wild and cheered her on as usual. During and after her performance people took to social media discussing how great she looked, the costume she wore, how she almost tripped, and the alleged political stand she was taking. Since her performance there has been a wide spread of conversations on talk shows, news outlets, social media sites, and radio stations discussing what is said to have been a controversial performance.... [tags: Mass media, Concentration of media ownership]
1952 words (5.6 pages)
- Issue Presented: With the continuing underrepresentation of groups in the juror selection process, what is the cause, and what can be done to obtain a fair cross section of jurors to serve on a jury. Short Answer: The Sixth Amendment provides a cross section guarantee of jurors representing a community, and to provide the defendant with a fair and impartial jury for trial. Statement of Facts: The issue of underrepresentation in a jury can certainly have a negative impact on criminal justice topic as a whole.... [tags: Jury, Jury trial, United States Constitution]
1031 words (2.9 pages)
- The U.S. recognizes the right to jury trial in virtually all criminal cases, including misdemeanor and felony. Twelve members make up a jury. The Sixth Amendment guarantees anyone facing a penalty of no less than six months imprisonment a jury trial. In reality, the Sixth Amendment does entitle the defendant to a jury trial if their offense is punishable by a period of below six months imprisonment. A jury trial helps to check or test out unfetthered prosecutorial power (Ward 83). Prosecutors must decide how and what to charge the defendant while considering that a jury will eventually decide their case upon presenting the evidence.... [tags: Jury, Criminal law, Court, Law]
1662 words (4.7 pages)
- Alright, let 's do this. Burdens: Let 's start by establishing these. We have equal burdens. It is my burden to show that the usage of jury nullification, on the whole, presents a net detriment. It is Pro 's burden to show the opposite. Thus, it is not my burden to present a case that seeks to end the right to jury nullification. So, as I 'm not seeking to end this right, the right itself isn 't up for discussion. I must only show that its usage is generally harmful to justice. Building on that, I also need not argue that jury nullification is harmful in all instances, just as it is not my opponent 's burden to show that every instance where jury nullification is used is beneficial to justi... [tags: Law, Jury, Justice, Common law]
1565 words (4.5 pages)
- The jury plays a crucial role in the courts of trial. They are an integral part in the Australian justice system. The jury system brings ordinary people into the courts everyday to judge whether a case is guilty or innocent. The role of the jury varies, depending on the different cases. In Australia, the court is ran by an adversary system. In this system “..individual litigants play a central part, initiating court action and largely determining the issues in dispute” (Ellis 2013, p. 133). In this essay I will be discussing the role of the jury system and how some believe the jury is one of the most important institutions in ensuring that Australia has an effective legal system, while other... [tags: jury systems, proceedings and judgements]
1507 words (4.3 pages)
- Jury Nullification Jury nullification means that a jury finds a defendant innocent because the law itself is unjust, or is unjust in a particular application, and so should not be applied. So really what this means is that no mater what the law says the jury will pretty much have the right to choose weather the person is going to be guilty or innocent and that is kind of ok in some cases but then again its not in others so we should not expect our juries to judge our laws only the case that person is being tried in and they should only judge that person on all of the facts given.... [tags: Jury Jurors Court Justice System Essays]
3967 words (11.3 pages)