Crime and Delinquency

1421 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: primary theories of crime causation

Crime and Delinquency

In 1939 Criminologist Edwin H. Sutherland proposed his theory of Differential Association in his Principles of Criminology textbook. Differential Association theory states that criminal behavior is learned behavior. Sutherland along with Richard Cloward, and Lloyd Ohlin attempted to explain this phenomenon by emphasizing the role of learning. To become a criminal, a person must not only be inclined toward illegal activity, he or she must also learn how to commit criminal acts. Sutherland’s differential association theory contends that people whose environment provides the opportunity to associate with criminals will learn these skills and will become criminals in response to strain. If the necessary learning structures are absent, they will not. Sutherland relied heavily upon the work of Shaw and McKay, Chicago school theorists, in high rates of juvenile delinquency. Sutherland's theory of differential association still remains very popular among criminologists due to its less complex and more coherent approach to crime causation. It is also supported by much evidence.

Sutherland did not mean that mere association with criminals would lead to criminal behavior. What he meant was that the contents of patterns in association would differ from individual to individual. He viewed crime as a consequence of conflicting values.

Differential association is a theory based on the social environment and its surrounding individuals and the values those individuals gain from significant others in their social environment.

According to Differential Association, criminal behavior is learned based on the interactions we have with others and the values that we receive during that interaction.

We learn values from family, friends, coworkers, etc.; those values either support or oppose criminal behavior. Sutherland also noted that individuals with an excess of criminal definitions will be more open to new criminal definitions and that individual will be less receptive to anti-criminal definitions. The theory does not emphasize who one's associates are but rather upon the definitions provided by those associations. Once techniques are learned, values (or definitions) supporting that criminal behavior may be learned from just about anyone.

Differential Association is based on nine postulates:

1) Criminal Behavior is learned

2) Cri...

... middle of paper ...

... criminals, which in real life is almost impossible to happen). Sutherland stressed the criminal behavior is learned and learned through communication. The slum where Sonny and his friends lived in provided the perfect area to cultivate criminal behavior. The slum was crowded; everyone knew everyone and they have enough time to interact with one another in an intimate setting.

As for the labeling theory, Sonny who was a squatter saw himself as such. He rationalized to himself that he was poor and there was no other way to achieve his goals through legal means. Probably at first he controlled his urge to do illegitimate actions but all his friends were involving him so it was only a matter of time before he caved in to their pressure. Howard Becker and Edwin Lemert noted that criminal definitions are enforced by the powerful and the act of getting caught begins the labeling process. So the moment the handcuffs were slapped on Sonny’s wrist, he was already seen by society (in the movie, the uzi-zeros and the neighbors) as a criminal even if he was innocent. Plus, the family of the victim who was rich did not want to hear the side of Sonny and pushed that he be punished severely.

Show More
Related

  • Character Analysis: The Other Wes Moore

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    Differential association theory was founded by Edwin H. Sutherland (Lilly, 2012, p. 43). This theory states that “any person will inevitably come into contact with definitions favorable to violation of the law and with definitions unfavorable to violation of the law” (Lilly, 2012, p. 44). Whichever definition is more prominent in a person’s mind, will lead to their decision of “whether the person embraces crime as an acceptable way of life” (Lilly, 2012, p. 44). Sutherland composed nine propositions that explained the theory. He explained that “crime is learned through the process of differential association” (Lilly, 2012, p. 45). The nine propositions explained that “criminal behavior is learned” (Lilly, 2012, p. 45). He explained that by communicating with others, especially those that are close to them they are more likely to pick up behaviors from those people. Differential association theory also explains that learning criminal behaviors “involves all the mechanisms that are involved in any other learning” (Lilly, 2012, p. 45). While learning a criminal behavior one not only learns “the techniques of committing the crime” but also the “specific direction of motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes” involved with crime (Lilly, 2012, p. 45). This is theory is shown throughout the book when the young Mr. Moore was influenced by the life of crime that was present in his

    Read More

  • Interaction And Self-Control Theory In The Movie 'Animal Kingdom'

    1330 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Animal Kingdom” is a movie about the criminal story of a 17 years old boy call Josh. His mother was died due to heroin overdose, he had no choice but to live with his grandma and the three uncles. The story is about how Josh was influenced by this crime family and to step in an uncontrollable situation. In the movie “Animal Kingdom”, the main character Josh has committed in crime, for example he stole a car, provided false declaration, and shoot dead. The differential association theory and self-control theory will be used to explain Josh criminal behaviors. The differential association theory suggested that criminal behaviors is a process of learning through interaction and communication with others (Sutherland, 1947). The self-control theory

    Read More

  • Edwin Sutherland, Ronald Akers, And Robert Agnek's Theory Of Crime In Society

    1084 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many different views on the origins of criminal behaviors within societies. One possible reason for why people commit crimes could be because they learned it from others. Edwin Sutherland works to explain this tactic through his theory of differential association. His theory states that criminal behavior is learned in interaction with others in intimate, personal groups. The learning of criminal behavior depends on the strength of the relationship with those who commit deviant actions. This learning also depends on their definitions of legal codes. For example, some people in society rationalize traffic speeding if it is only a couple miles over the speed limit while others are strongly against speeding at any degree. When a person’s

    Read More

  • Edwin Sutherland's Differential Association Theory Of Criminal Behavior

    1182 Words  | 3 Pages

    First and foremost, the theory states that criminal behavior is learned, meaning that the behaviors of an individual are influenced and shaped by those they associate with (Clinard & Meier, 2015). The primary reference point here is the nuclear family. Parents teach their children how to walk and talk, who grow up with siblings or in some cases, elderly relatives. With good reason, it is widely held that these interactions create the foundation of the individual’s conception of societal norms and values. That being said, if the individual is capable of assessing proper behavior in society, they are also capable of learning what is considered

    Read More

  • Behavior In Charles Duhigg's 'The Power Of Habit'

    1182 Words  | 3 Pages

    That craving is what powers the habit loop” (pg33). Craving is the actual fuel that starts the habit loop to a rotating cycle, without the feeling of crave there’s no habit loop since the individual doesn’t have any intention to seek rewards. Wolfram Schultz a professor of neuroscience at the University of Cambridge conducted an experiment with a monkey named Julio; the purpose of the experiment was to examine how Julio’s brain would react when Julio followed a procedure of touching a lever when the colored shape appeared on a monitor then Julio was rewarded with a drop of his favorite blackberry juice. While repeating this experiment, Schultz has seen an unusual activity inside Julio’s brain, where at first Julio’s brain activity started spiking when he was rewarded with drop of blackberry juice; however, as the experiment continued its brain activity started spiking when the cue appeared on the screen. Julio’s brain had developed a habit; “… habit only emerges once Julio begins craving the juice when he sees the cue” (49). Now that Julio has developed a craving for the blackberry juice, he will automatically follow the habit. This experiment clearly proves how significant craving can be since it drives the habit loop. Likewise, I crave the reward of finishing my schoolwork while relaxing to the music since; it allows me to release the stress that’s been pilling up inside my brain from

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Risk Akers Social Learning Theory

    1651 Words  | 4 Pages

    Akers (2000) states that, “The principle of differential Association is that a person commits criminal acts because he or she has learned “Definitions” (rationalizations and attitudes) favorable to violation of law in “excess” of the definitions unfavorable to violation of law” (p. 73). The key notion of Akers’ theory is that individuals who commit crime, do so because they have educated themselves on various types of behaviors and attitudes that dwell on law-breaking. This also happens to be one of the perceptions included in Sutherland’s Differential Association

    Read More

  • Columbine Shooting Essay

    2357 Words  | 5 Pages

    Secondly, differential association varies based on the intensity, duration, frequency, priority, and timing of one’s process of learning. Through this notion, the individual’s self is disregarded and more emphasis is placed on the extrinsic factors. Furthermore, “it is an individual’s experiences and the ways in which the individual defines those experiences which constitute to the learning of criminality”. (Gongenvare & Dotter, 2007,

    Read More

  • Procrastination In Charles Duhigg's The Power Of Habit

    1446 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is 10:00 PM and I begin to cram for the big exam tomorrow morning. A few days ago, I said I was going to study later, but I delayed studying and doing homework until the last minute. That is called procrastination, and I stopped doing that. Charles Duhigg, the author of The Power of Habit, reveals that people can change personal habits such as procrastination with the knowledge of the habit loop. Habit loops have three components: cues, routines, and rewards. Cues or signals trigger the brain to start routines in order to obtain a reward, which in a way incentivize the brain to remember the routines. For example, distraction signals me to watch television because I enjoy doing so. As a result, my brain will associate watching TV with happiness,

    Read More

  • Power Of Habit Duhigg Summary

    1045 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the book power of habit by Charles Duhigg, has shown that individuals in general can't identify whether a habit is good or not; we justify a habit on if the end result gives us satisfaction or not. Duhigg explains to his readers the toxic cause and effects of forming habits; and just how strong they could be. A habit of mine that needed changing was drinking monster energy drinks. The educational specialist, also concludes with the exact time habits are being formed, the series of actions are already being embedded in their head so they can perform the task again unconsciously, or effortless; this process is better known as chunking, or the “basal gangla (Duhigg ch 2)”. People overall can't identify their habits fully, which is

    Read More

  • John Wayne Gacy's Social Learning Theory

    1627 Words  | 4 Pages

    Social learning theory was first developed by Robert L. Burgess and Ronald L Akers in 1966 (Social Learning theory, 2016). In 1973, Akers wrote a book entitled Deviant Behaviour: A Social Learning Approach, which discussed Aker’s conception of the social learning theory. He developed social learning theory by extending Sutherland’s theory of differential association (Cochran & Sellers, 2017). Social learning theory is based on the principles of Pavlov’s operant and classical conditioning. Akers believes that crime is like any other social behavior because it is learned through social interaction (Social Learning theory, 2016). Social learning theory states that the probability of an individual committing a crime or engaging in criminal behaviour is increased when they differentially associate with others who commit criminal behavior (Cochran & Sellers, 2017). Social learning theory is classified as a general theory of crime, and has been used to explain many types of criminal behaviour (Social Learning theory, 2016). Furthermore, social learning theory is one of the most tested contemporary theories of crime. There are four fundamental components of social learning theory; differential association, definitions, differential reinforcement and imitation (Social Learning theory,

    Read More

  • Relation between Burglary and Differential Association Theory

    1691 Words  | 4 Pages

    Differential association theory best explains the burglary deviance. There are many principles associated with this type of learning theory. Edwin Sutherland’s theory discusses how crime is a learned behavior where one’s family, peers, and environment are of great influence. Differential association theory seeks to prove that criminal behavior is learned and this paper will evaluate the connection between the two.

    Read More

  • Akers' Social Learning Theory

    2220 Words  | 5 Pages

    High crime rates are an ongoing issue through the United States, however the motivation and the cause of crime has yet to be entirely identified. Ronald Akers would say that criminality is a behavior that is learned based on what an individual sees and observes others doing. When an individual commits a crime, he or she is acting on impulse based on actions that they have seen others engage in. Initially during childhood, individuals learn actions and behavior by watching and listening to others, and out of impulse they mimic the behavior that is observed. Theorist Ronald Akers extended Sutherland’s differential association theory with a modern viewpoint known as the social learning theory. The social learning theory states that individuals commit crime through their association with or exposure to others. According to Akers, people learn how to be offenders based on their observations around them and their association with peers. Theorist Akers states that for one, “people can become involved in crime through imitation—that is by modeling criminal conduct. Second, and most significant, Akers contended that definition and imitation are most instrumental in determining initial forays into crime” (Lilly, Cullen, and Ball 2011:57). Although Akers’ theory has been linked to juvenile delinquency in the past, it has also been tested as a possible cause of crime overall. Individuals learn from observation that criminal behavior is justifiable in certain circumstances. In connection with juvenile delinquency and crime, peers and intimate groups have the most effect on individuals when associated with criminal behavior. One is more likely to mimic the behavior of someone who they have close ties with, whether the behavior is justifiable or...

    Read More

  • Social Learning Theory And Criminal Behavior

    841 Words  | 2 Pages

    The essences of the social learning theory, which suggests that to understand criminal behavior we must examine perceptions, thoughts, expectancies, competencies, and values. Each person has his or her own version the world and lives by that version”. Social learning means that as humans we tend to learn “ by observing and listening to people

    Read More

  • Integrated Theory Integration: The Importance For The Causes Of Crime

    2559 Words  | 6 Pages

    According to Krohn (1986) bridged together theoretical propositions from the delinquency-enhancing effects of differential association and the delinquency-constraining effects of social bonds, as these interact with social learning and social control. His network theory maintains that the lower the network density in relationship to population density, the weaker the constraints against nonconformity, and the higher rates of

    Read More

  • Social Process Theory

    701 Words  | 2 Pages

    First lets aim in on the 3 main Social Process theories, learned, control and labeling. Learned Theory is learning deviant behavior and the process of learning conventional behavior is one in the same process. Neither criminals nor typical members of society are raised to be completely good or completely bad, neither completely deviant, or completely conforming; therefore criminals are not born and breed they are more like cultivated. Social control theory proposes that people's relationships, commitments, values and beliefs encourage them not to break the law. If moral codes are integrated into the individuals’ life, and they have a stake in their wider community, they will voluntarily limit their probability to commit deviant acts or crime. The theory seeks to understand the ways in which it is possible to reduce the likelihood of criminality developing in individuals. Finally the labeling theory “labels” the deviant acts or crimes. Socially these gives the crime or act a face which makes the offender recognizable by his other act rather than the content of their character prior to the deviant act.

    Read More

More about Crime and Delinquency

Open Document