The New International Economic Order
The gap between the rich and the poor is growing more and more every day. Something has got to be done to solve this issue. In 1974 members of the Third World gathered together at the United Nations. Their purpose was to find the answers to solve the gap between the rich and the poor. A total of seventy-seven members proposed the NIEO, hoping this might solve the gap. The NIEO stands for the New International Economic Order. Its aim was to bring the rich and the poor countries together to discuss issues that might bring the gap closer together. The negotiations of the NIEO were called the North and the South Dialog. Eighteen clauses made up the NIEO. These clauses were the changes that the Group of 77 desired.
One of the clauses stated that each state would be free to determine their own economic and political system. Unfortunately this did not happen due to the fact that rich countries have taken it among themselves to determine what is right for poor countries. The poor countries do not have a say in what they want.
The second clause stated that each state it to control their own natural resources. This means that rich countries will no longer be able to control poor countries natural resources like they had been doing. This causes a huge problem with rich countries who gather natural resources from these countries and the corporations who make money off of the natural resources. The rich countries do not like to see this take place. One example has to do with Chili and their copper. The copper of Chili is controlled by IT&T. During a presidential election in 1970, a man by the name of Allende said that if he was elected he would nationalize the copper. He was soon elected and then...
... middle of paper ...
...ms. One example deals with the AIDS epidemic in Ghauna. Twenty-five percent of the people in Ghauna have the AIDS virus. The AIDS virus is spreading even faster in the Third World Countries because of the lack of modern technology. The Third World Countries feel if the United States finds a shot that will prevent AIDS, the shot should be a Heritage of Mankind which means everyone will be intitled to it. The United States says no because they did the research and spent the time and money.
Overall, the Group of 77 had very good intentions. They saw that there needed to be something done to help solve the gap between the rich and the poor. The only problem is that the rich countries are far to ahead of the game. They will not allow many of the proposals to go into action. This leads to an even larger gap between the rich and the poor that is still on the increase.
The strength of a state is often connected to its’ ability to gain wealth. That wealth can be supported or delayed by laws that govern the trade of goods and services between those states. The guideline is referred to as the Commerce Clause. The Commerce Clause is an established guideline from the United States Constitution. It outlines the details of the trade of goods and services. It is born from the Tenth amendment of the constitution. It outlines what can and cannot be done as it relates to trade and affairs within the state and defines who controls the power to regulate it. It is the major thing that allows states to maintain powers related to commerce. According to Miller (2012) the Commerce Clause is focused
In addition to these substantive limitations to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Rodrik states that their enforcement rule was “a joke” and that the requirements it had were “patently unenforceable” (pg. 72-74). Due to this, any essential requirements were of limited effectiveness. While majority of people considered these characteristics from the agreement to be things that needed to be corrected, Rodrik favors them, and thinks of them as positives. He indicates that these characteristics are what made the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade “successful” to its ability “to achieve the maximum amount of trade compatible with different nations doing their own thing,” by, keeping intrusions into domestic affairs to a minimum (pg. 75). On the other hand, he argues that the World Trade Organization is trying to reach “hyperglobalization,” with the rules that it is now enforcing to the sectors that used to be excluded, and to areas like health and safety rules, subsides and intellectual property. Rodrik, states that while the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade cases were primarily about tariffs and quotas, the World Trade Organization disputes, “reach into domestic areas that
The United States has for over two centuries been involved in the growing world economy. While the U.S. post revolutionary war sought to protect itself from outside influences has since the great depression and world war two looked to break trade restrictions. The United States role in the global economy has grown throughout the 20th century and as a result of several historical events has adopted positions of both benefactor and dependent. The United States trade policy has over time shifted from isolationist protectionism to a commitment to establishing world-wide free trade. Free trade enterprise has developed and grown through organizations such as the WTO and NAFTA. The U.S. in order to obtain its free trade desires has implemented a number of policies that can be examined for both their benefits and flaws. Several trade policies exist as options to the United States, among these fair trade and free trade policies dominate the world economic market. In order to achieve economic growth the United States has a duty to maintain a global trade policy that benefits both domestic workers and industry. While free trade gives opportunities to large industries and wealthy corporate investors the American worker suffers job instability and lower wages. However fair trade policies that protect America’s workers do not help foster wide economic growth. The United States must then engage in economic trade policies that both protect the United States founding principles and secure for tomorrow greater economic stability.
The Uruguay Round in 1993was created to further reduce trade barriers. The result was the creation of the World Trading Organization (WTO). The main goal of the WTO is to police the international trading system. The data that the WTO has kept states that the volume of world trade has grown consistently faster than the volume of world output since the 1950’s. Two other types monitoring policies are the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. The IMF is an international institution set up to maintain order in the international monetary system. The World Bank in defined as an international institution set up to promote general economic development in the world’s poorer nations.
Since the start of trade in the United States and around the world there has always been a need for rules and regulations. The GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) was the one for the past century that dealt with issues that would arise they wrote rules on things that were acceptable and not acceptable in the trade arena. Out of the GATT came the World Trade Organization (WTO) that was designed to take care of more issues than GATT. Although the WTO has only been around for almost a decade it has come under criticism from almost all arenas. They have had issues brought to their table that have been hard decisions and now have issues they must deal with that could affect the way free trade is in the future. Countries have battled amongst each other as how to solve a problem such as The Beef Hormone Case, The Shrimp Turtle case and the Caribbean Banana Case. These were case that will be discussed later, but have set a kind of foundation for the WTO as to where they will be headed in the future. Agriculture has become a hot issue in the international market and the WTO is still trying to find ways to accommodate the developed countries and develop further growth in the developing nations. The World Trade Organization is also stepping into new territory and the future is no exception.
Sutter, John. "7 ways to narrow the rich-poor gap." CNN. Cable News Network, 1 Jan. 1970. Web. 10 May 2014
The most widely cited reason for China’s push to join is to keep the process of reform going. In many ways, the WTO membership was the best way for China to hold economic growth. The world economy has become much more complex and interdependent, and China's participation - based on the rules of international trade - was essential for China and for the rest of the world.
In this book, subtitled Neoliberalism and Global Order, Noam Chomsky discusses a number of issues concerning neoliberalism, propaganda, free markets and illusions concerning them, more specific issues concerning Latin America, the ways in which democracy functions (or fails to function) in practice, and finally specific international agreements. This review will provide a broad overview of the positions set out in the book. It will then focus in more detail on three of the most important of these positions and arguments. Finally, an overall assessment of the book will be offered, as well as an evaluation of the author’s intended audience and his intent, including whether the material presented is appropriate for these audiences and intents.
The issue of trade has been a factor in the interrelations between nations since their conception. Throughout history there have been many different structures that encompass these trade relations. In essence, the state of trade between counties coincided with, and depended upon, their economies, social structure, willingness to trade, and their available resources (tradable products and services). Today's trade system is still formulated by these factors. However, there are many more concerns and actors which must be weighed. The current international trade system is, to say the least, much more complex. In its complexity, the trade system has also inherited a very controversial nature.
In the world of international political economy, three dominant perspectives have emerged over time. The differences and similarities between the realist/mercantilist, liberalism, and historical structuralism perspectives are significant. In this essay, I will compare and contrast these dominant perspectives. First, I will give a historical account of how each perspective originated. Then I will outline the actors involved in each perspective, explore those actors’ interests, and outline which of those actors set economic and political policy. Lastly, I will explore how those political and economic actors relate to each other.
National economies are more connected today than ever before with nations focusing on their comparative advantages and a global economy has been created but because of this, the world’s economies have become increasingly interdependent and volatile. Oil is the backbone of the global economy, but oil is a quickly depleting resource and eventually government protection of oil resources will lead to the collapse of global trade. Globalization causes negative effects on the world’s economies, with increased interdependence leading to issues like Contagion. Governments are steadily becoming more involved in regulating their economies and protecting their own economies will hurt globalization. Government involvement in the economy makes globalization unsustainable.
The global economy has had great impact on the labor force, affecting each country in its own way whether it deals with outsourcing and offshoring or unemployment. The term global economy means integrating the world economy through trade, production, and distribution while consuming goods and services. Globalization has progressively integrated its way into all countries and the United States has seen that on the rise with diverse ethnic, economic, and religious groups that work together in everyday tasks. While the U.S. has taken advantage of their leadership role in the global economy, it is continuing to face global competition. United States has had its position in the world economy threatened by the BRIC – Brazil, Russia, India, and China, because they can provide labor for cheaper than what the United States can domestically. China’s economic power is on the rise, having more graduate and PHD’s, highly innovative, and taking a strong standpoint on reshaping the future of the global economy. The United States plays a strong role in the global economy is now threatened by the expansion in competition for jobs and investment by China, whose nation is on the rise.
The international system is the structure of relationships between the actors in the global environment in the international level. The relationships between both state and non-state actors, international organizations and multi-national corporations. The international system is the ground for policymakers as they work along the process of policy making and applying the interests of their state. To cut the long story short , a person involved in the business of policy making must understand the international system to create a foreign policy that suits the interest of the people. In a way, the use of international relations (IR) theories would help in understanding the status quo and would eventually help a policy maker to create a good foreign
The macroeconomic environment is a dynamic environment, which could not remain unchanged (Gajewsky 2015). There are many factors influence the global macroeconomic environment, such as interest rate, exchange rate, GDP，aggregate demand, monetary policy and other macroeconomic variable (Oxelheim and Wihlborg 2008). These factors are closely associated with commodity price.
The term ‘Global Economy’ refers to worldwide economic activities that affect countries positively or negatively through trade and economic growth. The term came into picture after Globalization took place. The term Globalization signifies “the rapidly increasing interdependence, integration & interaction among people to share the economic activities taking place in various locations around the world”.