In the world of college athletics there are endless topics discussed daily and most pertain to money. An issue that falls under this category includes the heated debate involving whether or not student athletes should receive money. Many people say student athletes should receive compensation according to their specific needs because they spend so much time earning their scholarship and have no time to work. On the other hand, the stronger argument is student athletes should not be able to acquire additional funds in order to help aid them through college. An athlete knows what he or she is involving themselves in before any money issue is even brought up. Signing a letter of intent shows that they understand this. But people still feel the opportunity to work a job while competing in a sport is virtually non existent in a division one atmosphere, and therefore athletes need money.
When looking at all angles, those that feel athletes should be paid usually have the same arguments. They think because athletes have minimal free time and a lot of the school’s revenue is produced by them, this qualifies athletes to a portion of money. For instance, football and men’s basketball have proven over the years to make the most money for most universities. In fact “Since 1965, the NCAA increased its revenue by 8000 percent and CBS signed a contract through the year, 2002, for $72 million to cover the NCAA tournament. (“For Years” par. 5) With these kinds of numbers produced by college athletes many suggest they need to receive a little back. It’s a reasonable thought since athletes are responsible for such an enormous amount of cash flow. The NCAA is often compared to a business and a bu...
... middle of paper ...
...a university and playing a sport at the same time was supposed to be easy or profitable.
If a law was to pass regarding college athletes receiving money many things would be different in the future. A major concern involves recruiting. Universities allowed to pay players would be able to buy recruits persuading them to attend the school offering the most money. It’s almost like a free agent in professional sports. Attending the school with the most to offer decreases the likelihood of a fair playing ground for all of college athletics. As a result certain schools would be major powerhouses and it would stay this way forever. Although there are some schools considered powerhouses now, the odds of a school with complete domination would be much more likely. Overall if student athletes begin to get paid, collegiate sports will become corrupted.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In recent years, a major controversy in the NCAA has been whether or not student athletes in college should be paid for playing sports. There are different viewpoints from different people stating if they should or not. Many people believe that they are already being rewarded enough with their education being paid, but even with the school’s help with their tuition and school fees, many have trouble paying personal expenses. Even though some people believe they shouldn’t be compensated for their hard work and dedication, it is the right thing to do, due to their lack of time occupied by sports and schoolwork.... [tags: Payig College Athletes]
1516 words (4.3 pages)
- With March Madness almost amongst us the big question floating around is, “should student athletes be paid?” The huge amount of money being made off college sports has led some to question whether student-athletes can be considered amateurs any longer, and whether they should, instead, be paid for their efforts. I feel that student athletes should not get paid because they are already being paid through scholarships, it wouldn’t be fair to their peers and it would open a can of worms causing more problems.... [tags: Sports, College, Scholarships]
822 words (2.3 pages)
- There are 460,000 NCAA student-athletes competing this school year (NCAA). With so many individuals that are going to college just for a degree it should be considered a valuable option to help pay for expenses. Student athletes should be paid because the school is making money off of the students’ athletic performances, the full-scholarships the students may be receiving does not cover all the costs of attending college, the young adults should not have to quit their college education because their bills are too much.... [tags: Education, Higher education, University]
733 words (2.1 pages)
- Every year, it seems that we're hearing more and more about NCAA athletes being punished for intentionally making a profit from their athletic careers. The NCAA and colleges are doing their best to stand by the principles on which the NCAA was founded. Since the National Collegiate Athletic Association, more commonly known as the NCAA, was founded as a non-profit organization in 1906(....), much has changed, but one thing that has not changed is the Association's goal, that goal being to protect players from being exploited and ensure their right to fair treatment.(....) In order for the NCAA to uphold their guidelines, universities cannot not pay their athletes.... [tags: college athletes, NCAA, scholarships]
1717 words (4.9 pages)
- Today there is much controversy over the subject of compensating college athletes. Some believe that providing a payment would further complicate the issue, but others say that it would end all of the problems. College athletes should receive some form of compensation for participation in collegiate sports due to the hardships they endure, a failure of scholarships to cover all expenses , the exploitation of college athletes by the colleges and universities they play for, a disparity between coaches’ and players’ compensation, and the hypocrisy of National Collegiate Athletic Association’s rules.... [tags: Student-Athletes Should Be Paid]
2125 words (6.1 pages)
- "The best argument against paying players is that it diminishes the value of an education" (qtd. in Zimbalist). State University has breached its academic standard by allocating unnecessary expenditures to athletically advanced students. Student athletes should not be paid at State University, because it focuses on an extracurricular activity as a means of profit, praises athletic ability over merit/ scholastics, promotes a bridge between players and regular students, and creates hierarchy between universities.... [tags: Pro Con Essays]
1793 words (5.1 pages)
- College is a huge step that many people take in order to set themselves up for success in the future. From all over the world people with many different goals go to college to learn the necessary skills they need in order to do what it is that they want to do. Whether it’s to be a painter, an actor, or a detective, people go to college to hone their skills to have a lucrative career. Athletics is also one of those things. Many Students go to college in order to properly learn how to advance in the sport that they want to play, or be a professional.... [tags: National Collegiate Athletic Association]
2319 words (6.6 pages)
- The NCAA is currently debating that student athletes should be compensated for everything they do. There are not a lot of high school athletes that can’t even make it to the NCAA, but for those who don’t realize how much they get involved in. Although the debate is currently balanced on both sides, it is not ethical to pay student athletes. For a division I athlete, they are clearly already getting a full ride leaving with a college degree and no debt. Why should they be paid more. One clear reason that it is not ethically right is the title IX situation, another would be the benefit compared to the cost.... [tags: National Collegiate Athletic Association]
811 words (2.3 pages)
- In recent years, the debate on whether or not student athletes should be paid for their athletic duties has been a rising issue. The reason that this issue is arising is because athletes feel as if everyone benefits for their playing except for them. There have been many different arguments on each side of this debate which bring up many different points. Student athletes should not get paid because they are already getting a great deal with the scholarship they receive from the NCAA. Advocates who support the payment of student athletes such as former professional athlete, Tyson Hartnett believe that student athletes’ scholarships are not enough to cover their personal finances.... [tags: University, Student, Scholarship, Education]
2112 words (6 pages)
- Student Athletes Should Not Be Paid In the world of college athletics there are endless topics discussed daily and most pertain to money. An issue that falls under this category includes the heated debate involving whether or not student athletes should receive money. Many people say student athletes should receive compensation according to their specific needs because they spend so much time earning their scholarship and have no time to work. On the other hand, the stronger argument is student athletes should not be able to acquire additional funds in order to help aid them through college.... [tags: College Sports]
936 words (2.7 pages)