Animal testing has always been plagued with controversy on its ethical issues by animal activist groups and supportive scientists. Is it morally just to experiment and sacrifice laboratory animals on behalf of human research? Dr. Gina Solomon MD wrote her article regarding the benefits of animal testing to protect the human race and all other species. Her article “The Lesser Evil” shows the beneficial and positive aspects of animal experimentation. She approves the notion for animal testing but requests greater regulation and gentler methods of testing when scientifically possible. Dr. Solomon’s article was published in the Earth Island Journal, Autumn 2002, v17, i3, pg 47.
Dr. Gina Solomon MD works for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). She is a senior scientist and physician of the Health and Environment program. Dr. Solomon’s article is trustworthy and credible because she is a licensed practitioner of medicine and a chief scientist. She relies on personal experience and scientific data to justify the use of animal testing. She works for a reputable nonprofit organization whose opinions are valued for the protection of human life. Dr. Solomon focuses her article toward those who are undecided or opposed to animal testing. She hopes to persuade her audience of the scientific human advantage gained by animal experimentation. Animal experimentation is essential for the protection from harmful chemicals and pesticides for all living creatures on Earth. The animal research allows scientist to better recognize and distinguish poisonous materials for humans and wildlife. Animal activist agencies, such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), ar...
... middle of paper ...
...a huge uncontrolled chemical experiment,” (Solomon, pg 47).
I enjoyed Dr. Solomon’s article because she justifies her argument very thoroughly. She uses personal experience and factual information to support her opinions on animal testing. I found her article to be informative as well as persuasive. Her trustworthy personality shines through her article from her personal beliefs and convictions. She acknowledges the need for animal experimentation but does not appreciate the waste of any animal life. She used scientific research to explain the necessity to discover the dangerous chemical side effects endangering all life forms. The byproducts of Dr. Solomon’s article will be a better understanding for animal testing. People will accept testing on animals to be an essential part of human and wildlife protection from toxic chemicals and pesticides.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... At the same time, companies continue inventing newer and better products that require a new set of chemicals to be tested. However, animal testing may not seem as beneficial as one would think. According to Henry Mone, “Reliance on animal testing… has actually hindered the evaluation of many chemicals and ingredients inside and outside the cosmetics industry.” Due to the amount of time and money animal testing takes, it is almost not worth it (20). It is not the time and money that have people concerned, but the way they test the animals.... [tags: Animal testing, Testing cosmetics on animals]
1328 words (3.8 pages)
- Animal Testing Animal testing is the running of tests and the research done in a laboratory on animals. Some of the tests are done to benefit human lives and other tests are done to determine side effects of a certain household or cosmetic products. It is a topic that has been up for debate for many years not only in the United States, but all around the world. While some support the advances that come from the research others oppose the cruelty that the media projects to society. No matter what one’s opinion of the subject is, it is still something that our society and culture deals with.... [tags: Animal Testing]
809 words (2.3 pages)
- Another Look at Animal Testing When it comes to animal testing, one of the first thing most people think of, is that animals are used simply for bettering and improving cosmetics. Many would argue that using helpless animals for tests without a huge benefit to society is not fair, and their innocent lives are worth more. However, animal testing is actually crucial and beneficial for society. Animal testing may be cruel, nevertheless the animals allow the medical practices to advance, the military to attain knowledge and the population of both human and animal is not effected in anyway therefore, animal research should continue.... [tags: animal cruelty, exploitation and abuse]
1142 words (3.3 pages)
- Nine year old Amy has already had a rough start in life. She was born with an abnormal heart that hinders her everyday activities. Amy is unable to keep up with kids her own age because she often tires out easily. As a consequence, she has very little friends and is often alone. Amy is forced to take different medications everyday just to survive. Amy’s life consists of medicine, doctors, and constant hospital visits. However, Amy is due for a heart transplant that will save her life. The transplant goes extremely well and now Amy has the opportunity to go to high school and live a normal teenage life.... [tags: Animal Rights ]
1715 words (4.9 pages)
- ... This is a brief description of how life is for the domestic animals used as test subjects. It is inhumane to keep someone locked up for their entire life so why do we do this to animals. The tests done to these animals vary from new drug testing, potential disease cures, poisoning for toxicity testing, burnt skin, or any damage to the body including the brain, eyes, or heart. During these tests animals usually receive the substance daily for up to two years with no recovery period. Most of the animals given these tests, except chimpanzees, die before the experiment is completed.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, Human]
1109 words (3.2 pages)
- Animal Experimentation has been around for centuries. In fact, animal testing dates back to the days of Aristotle. During these times, scientists would dissect animals to test surgical procedures before using these procedures on humans, which is similar to what we do now. Today, vivisection, the use of animals for scientific purposes, helps and hinders medical research and development. Therefore, there are many pros and cons to animals testing for scientific research. So far animal testing has resulted in the increase of countless human and animal lives and life expectancies around the world.... [tags: Animal Experimentation, History, Polio, Rubella]
943 words (2.7 pages)
- The ethical treatment and testing on animals is a widely controversial subject in the field of zoology. Views on animal testing range from positivity to full negativity. Animals such as mice and rats have been found to have psychological and genetic similarities that relate to humans which make them perfect for the experimental trials. Before various products are put out for humans consumption, animals are the most common way for companies to see if their new inventions work. The benefits and improvements to modern medicine as a result of animal testing should be weighed heavily against the harmful and toxic ingredients used in such experiments and their detrimental effects on test subject... [tags: Animal Testing Debate]
1030 words (2.9 pages)
- ... According to Archibald (2004), in 1937, in the USA, a drug was distributed in liquid to treat streptococcal infections. Unfortunately, the solvent was diethylene glycol (antifreeze), which was known to be horribly and fatally toxic but drug-safety testing was not required. 137 deaths followed. In addition, animals have saved human lives for decades. Without animal research, many of the diseases would still affect the world today and few cures would be found. According to Emory University, “major medical advances that have resulted from animal research include the treatment of rabies, smallpox, pellagra, and rickets and the discovery of sulfa drugs, penicillin, and other modern antibiotic... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1000 words (2.9 pages)
- ... In this paper I will argue that the medical field should either seek alternatives for animal research or the methods be refined to reduce the unethical treatment towards the animals as subjects. Animal experimentation has been used as a vital role in medical research throughout history. Physicians in ancient Greece dissected animals for anatomical studies. Using live animals in experiments did not raise any moral questions during the time since the Greeks believed that humans were superior to all animals.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1231 words (3.5 pages)
- When it comes to animals and their rights, there is a definite line between our needs and our taking advantage of those species that we consider inferior. As long as man has existed he has been carnivorous, and the same holds true for many other species of animals. Animals are a necessity to humans for survival, whether it be for food, clothing, etc. However, the unnecessary torture of animals through testing is not a necessity for human survival. When it comes to the needless torture of animals that we claim to benefit, the animals lives need to be taken into consideration.... [tags: Animal Testing]
1951 words (5.6 pages)