Animal testing has always been plagued with controversy on its ethical issues by animal activist groups and supportive scientists. Is it morally just to experiment and sacrifice laboratory animals on behalf of human research? Dr. Gina Solomon MD wrote her article regarding the benefits of animal testing to protect the human race and all other species. Her article “The Lesser Evil” shows the beneficial and positive aspects of animal experimentation. She approves the notion for animal testing but requests greater regulation and gentler methods of testing when scientifically possible. Dr. Solomon’s article was published in the Earth Island Journal, Autumn 2002, v17, i3, pg 47.
Dr. Gina Solomon MD works for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). She is a senior scientist and physician of the Health and Environment program. Dr. Solomon’s article is trustworthy and credible because she is a licensed practitioner of medicine and a chief scientist. She relies on personal experience and scientific data to justify the use of animal testing. She works for a reputable nonprofit organization whose opinions are valued for the protection of human life. Dr. Solomon focuses her article toward those who are undecided or opposed to animal testing. She hopes to persuade her audience of the scientific human advantage gained by animal experimentation. Animal experimentation is essential for the protection from harmful chemicals and pesticides for all living creatures on Earth. The animal research allows scientist to better recognize and distinguish poisonous materials for humans and wildlife. Animal activist agencies, such as PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), ar...
... middle of paper ...
...a huge uncontrolled chemical experiment,” (Solomon, pg 47).
I enjoyed Dr. Solomon’s article because she justifies her argument very thoroughly. She uses personal experience and factual information to support her opinions on animal testing. I found her article to be informative as well as persuasive. Her trustworthy personality shines through her article from her personal beliefs and convictions. She acknowledges the need for animal experimentation but does not appreciate the waste of any animal life. She used scientific research to explain the necessity to discover the dangerous chemical side effects endangering all life forms. The byproducts of Dr. Solomon’s article will be a better understanding for animal testing. People will accept testing on animals to be an essential part of human and wildlife protection from toxic chemicals and pesticides.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Animal experimentation is a very controversial topic. The reason this subject is so contentious is because the subject sounds convincing from both point of views. Animal experimentation in so many words is the testing and research of animals for the benefit of humans. Those who are pro-animal testing believe animal experimentation is beneficial and necessary because by using the data that is collected, a preventive mechanism is then produced to help save the lives of humans. However, people that oppose animal testing view animal experimentation as nothing but pointless pain and suffering for the subjects, and not beneficial enough to the lives of humans to continue this style of gathering in... [tags: Animal rights, Animal testing, Human]
1152 words (3.3 pages)
- Animals of all kinds have been suffering for far too long from animal testing. Testing animals is not a beneficial or reliable way of testing a product or for medical research. There are many different and more accurate ways to tests products or do research than on animals. Animal testing is not safe for animals which is why testing on animals is morally wrong. This essay will examine the scope of the need to illegalize all testing on any animal. The organization of this essay will be set up in compare and contract format.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1648 words (4.7 pages)
- “The question is not, can they reason, nor, can they talk. But can they suffer?” (Bentham). Each year over a hundred million animals endure a number of experiments in an attempt to make human lives easier. These experiments range from cosmetic testing to medical research, sadly neither of these tests are needed. Many people will accept animal research because they believe that these animals aren’t suffering (“Harm and Suffering”) or they believe that animal testing in beneficial to humans. In reality, these animals suffer for mankind, when the need does not exist.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1607 words (4.6 pages)
- Many companies around the world test Cosmetic and medicinal related products to make sure it is safe for human consumption. Most branded cosmetic or medicinal companies have testing labs working every day. Animals are very similar to humans biologically, and are accepted in many households as pets. However companies have tested products on animals for many years. Medicines like insulin were discovered directly from the experimentation on dogs. Although testing on animals has helped humanity by providing medicines, the cosmetic testing is unneeded, and with alternatives available for both medicinal and cosmetic testing the testing on animals must stop.... [tags: Animal testing, Testing cosmetics on animals]
711 words (2 pages)
- Nearly every family in America has one household pet. Little do they know, the pet food they are feeding their dogs and cats has been tested on animals. The Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) has strict guidelines that send new foods through tests to evaluate their nutritional value as well as the food in general. AAFCO has set up strict guidelines when it comes to testing on animals like: using the least amount of animals, low test duration, and having veterinarians on hand (AAFCO).... [tags: Animal testing, Testing cosmetics on animals]
1328 words (3.8 pages)
- “In 2010 that 97,123 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia for relief.” (ProCon). In recent years animals have been more and more mistreated and manipulated in order to test many of the products that we use today. A common belief of many people is that it is better for this to be tested on animals than humans. This alone is a very disturbing. The problem with this is that no life whether it is human or animal is worth being put through the pain and discomfort in order for us to have personal gain.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, Suffering]
1496 words (4.3 pages)
- Is it right for us to test on innocent animals just for our human gain. The ethical issues of testing products and other needs on animals are many but when it comes down to if it is ethical, testing on animals is not ethical by any means. Animal testing is a wrongful act that causes pain on innocent animals that have no say or rights in order to stop this. Animal testing is a growing concern because who is to say that these companies and corporations get tired or see new opportunities on testing their products in humans.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1491 words (4.3 pages)
- Animal Testing Animal testing is the running of tests and the research done in a laboratory on animals. Some of the tests are done to benefit human lives and other tests are done to determine side effects of a certain household or cosmetic products. It is a topic that has been up for debate for many years not only in the United States, but all around the world. While some support the advances that come from the research others oppose the cruelty that the media projects to society. No matter what one’s opinion of the subject is, it is still something that our society and culture deals with.... [tags: Animal Testing]
809 words (2.3 pages)
- Another Look at Animal Testing When it comes to animal testing, one of the first thing most people think of, is that animals are used simply for bettering and improving cosmetics. Many would argue that using helpless animals for tests without a huge benefit to society is not fair, and their innocent lives are worth more. However, animal testing is actually crucial and beneficial for society. Animal testing may be cruel, nevertheless the animals allow the medical practices to advance, the military to attain knowledge and the population of both human and animal is not effected in anyway therefore, animal research should continue.... [tags: animal cruelty, exploitation and abuse]
1142 words (3.3 pages)
- When it comes to animals and their rights, there is a definite line between our needs and our taking advantage of those species that we consider inferior. As long as man has existed he has been carnivorous, and the same holds true for many other species of animals. Animals are a necessity to humans for survival, whether it be for food, clothing, etc. However, the unnecessary torture of animals through testing is not a necessity for human survival. When it comes to the needless torture of animals that we claim to benefit, the animals lives need to be taken into consideration.... [tags: Animal Testing]
1951 words (5.6 pages)