Hypothetical Consent and Justification
A commonly accepted criticism of the social contract approach to justifying political authority targets the idea of hypothetical consent. Since only actual agreements are binding, the argument goes, citizens are not bound to obey their governments on the ground that, under circumstances different from the ones in which they now find themselves, they would have agreed to submit to its authority. (1) The purpose of this paper is to rescue hypothetical consent from this objection. I begin by distinguishing political legitimacy from political obligation. (2) I argue that while hypothetical consent may not serve as an adequate ground for political obligation, it is capable of grounding political legitimacy.
I understand a theory of political legitimacy to give an account of the justice of political arrangements. (3) I understand a theory of political obligation to give an account of why and under what conditions, citizens are morally required to obey the rules constituting those arrangements. The social contract tradition offers us hypothetical consent theories of both political obligation and political legitimacy, frequently neglecting to distinguish the two ideas. Likewise, the common objection to hypothetical consent theories — that hypothetical contracts do not bind — ...
... middle of paper ...
...vice of representation".
(14) For an argument that no contractual agreement on the two principles of justice occurs in the original position and that therefore the two principles are not justified by a contract, see Jean Hampton, "Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory?" The Journal of Philosophy 77, 6 (June 1980): 315-38.
(15) As Jeremy Waldron maintains, "When we move from asking what people actually accept to asking what they would accept under certain conditions, we shift our emphasis away from the will and focus on the reasons that people might have for exercising their will in one way rather than another." Waldron, p. 55.
(16) This objection is due to Bruce Landesman.
(17) For a discussion of this distinction and the relation between the reasonable and the rational, see Rawls, PL, pp. 48-54.
(18) See Freeman, pp. 123-31.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- What makes a political authority legitimate. A legitimate political authority, in this essay, will be taken to mean that there is a justification for an individual or a body to have power over other people in determining such things as laws and protection of freedom. To consider this question, three theories shall be looked at – Hobbes’, Rousseau and finally Locke and determine which gives the most persuasive account of legitimate political authority. To begin with, their hypothetical starting point, the state of nature, shall be discussed to establish the foundations of their political authority.... [tags: power, laws, protection of freedom]
2040 words (5.8 pages)
- I will advance the thesis, if an enlightened despot seized power in the UK, and governed it justly, then the despot would have legitimate authority. By saying the despot’s authority would be legitimate, I mean that, even though the despot abruptly seized power without the explicit consent of the citizens, which would then result in a loss of autonomy and negative liberty, the authority is governing the society justly, so a small amount of their rights must be sacrificed for a better society.... [tags: political authority, rule, autonomy]
1739 words (5 pages)
- The nature of a good life and its relation to political legitimacy is a subject which both Thomas Hobbes and Emma Goldman examine in their writings. Hobbes claims that only basic survival is necessary to live a good life because ultimately life is more valuable than comfort. Goldman on the other hand claims that freedom is far more important than simply living and a good life can only be lived by someone who is free to do as they please. In order for a political theorist to understand how legitimate governments and communities aught treat their citizens these theories are essential.... [tags: Political Philosophy Sociology]
947 words (2.7 pages)
- In the 1940s across industrialised countries, the unique creation of welfare states were introduced. (Lowe, 2005) The term welfare state refers to a society in which the government takes active responsibility for the welfare of citizens living in their jurisdiction. (Lowe, 2005) In the UK, the welfare state consist of policies designed to reflect social need, and includes benefits for those considered to be lower social classes. (Lowe, 2005) Created around the ideas of Beveridge in 1944, the welfare state was a product of liberal form in 1906, and became accepted by Labour in 1945.... [tags: legitimacy crisis ]
2840 words (8.1 pages)
- Consent and Political Obligation Consent is defined as “an act of permitting something to be done or of recognizing some authority” (Britannica, n.d.). Almost all political theorists share this definition of consent, however the boundaries surrounding this definition leave us asking many questions: how do we consent, to whom do we consent and when do we consent. Most importantly, did we consent at all. When we go back to the fundamentals of defining how, when, and if we gave consent, it is to be derived that we never consented.... [tags: Political philosophy, Law, Philosophy]
1580 words (4.5 pages)
- Legitimation refers to people’s beliefs about political authority and the ability to defend these beliefs with justification. The three main sources of legitimacy are typically understood as acceptance of authority and the need to obey its commands. People have faith in political or social order because it has been there for a long time (tradition), have faith in the rulers (charisma), or trust its legality, specifically the rationality of the rule of law (rational) (Weber 1990 ; 1964). Whilst legitimacy is constantly evolving due to current perceptions of society; texts such as ‘Oedipus the King’ (Sophocles) and ‘The Apology’ (Plato) that date back to fifth century BCE explore the not... [tags: apollo, political authority, legitimation]
897 words (2.6 pages)
- Americans are deeply divided politically and the recent gridlock in Congress has highlighted the public distrust of the Federal Government. While Congress’ approval rating has remained barely above a dismal 10 percent , one specific federal institution has remained above the fray. Regardless of the political bantering that is occurring on Capital Hill, the United States Military has remained the most trusted institution in the nation. Many experts have argued this phenomenon is due to the apolitical nature of the military.... [tags: using veteran's voice to pursue political agendas]
3188 words (9.1 pages)
- However, such a description of democratic regimes can be considered idealistic at best as it is not always the case that leaders of democratic regimes depend on the votes of the electorate to win. The absence of free, fair and competitive elections removes the incentive for the leaders to respect the laws for the people no longer have control over the government. The re-election process in Africa, despite the officials being involved in much public misconduct, corruption and lawlessness easily illustrates this (Gumbi, 2014), such as in Nigeria where the ruling party, People’s Democratic Party which has stayed in power by repeatedly rigging the election process.... [tags: Government, Democracy, Tradition, Legitimacy]
1130 words (3.2 pages)
- Legitimacy and the Foundations of Legitimate Government In this paper, it is my intention to discuss the issue of legitimacy as it relates to government. I will explore what a legitimate government necessarily consists of; that is, I will attempt to formulate a number of conditions a government must meet in order to be considered legitimate. A logical starting point in an investigation of legitimate government would seem to be an account of the original purpose of government. Problems arise, though, in discovering this original purpose; any and all attempts seem to consist of mere speculation.... [tags: Politics Political]
6740 words (19.3 pages)
- Informed consent is the basis for all legal and moral aspects of a patient’s autonomy. Implied consent is when you and your physician interact in which the consent is assumed, such as in a physical exam by your doctor. Written consent is a more extensive form in which it mostly applies when there is testing or experiments involved over a period of time. The long process is making sure the patient properly understands the risk and benefits that could possible happen during and after the treatment.... [tags: Medical Consent]
1909 words (5.5 pages)
- International Free Trade and World Peace
- The Economic and Political Motives of the American Constitution vs. the Articles of Confederation
- Democracy and Political Obligation
- America's Role in the World Trade Organization Debate Over China
- A Humean Theory of Distributive Justice
- John Dewey's Critique of Socioeconomic Individualism