ABSTRACT: In his Logic, Pierre Gassendi proposes that our inductive inferences lack the information we would need to be certain of the claims that they suggest. Not even deductivist inference can insure certainty about empirical claims because the experientially attained premises with which we adduce support for such claims are no greater than probable. While something is surely amiss in calling deductivist inference "probabilistic," it seems Gassendi has hit upon a now-familiar, sensible point—namely, the use of deductive reasoning in empirical contexts, while providing certain formal guarantees, does not insulate empirical arguments from judgment by the measure of belief which we invest in their premises. The more general point, which distinguishes Gassendi among his contemporaries, is that the strength shared by all empirical claims consists in the warrant from experience for those claims we introduce in their support.
In Book IV (On method) of his Institutio Logica, Pierre Gassendi proposes an unusual venue for probable and nondeductive inference in empirical reasoning: demonstrative syllogism. Thus, in 'resolution'—the seeking of a thing's causes given the evidence of its effects—he recognizes the critical role of inferring general claims from the particulars of empirical data, not least from what he calls 'the evidence of signs'. And intriguingly, he construes resolution-based claims as merely probable, though we attain them through classically deductive syllogism, because they represent merely possible claims among a field of alternatives—perhaps in the manner of Descartes's method. In the preceding book (On the syllogism), Gassendi presents a relatively tradit...
... middle of paper ...
Garber, Daniel. "Descartes and Experiment in the Discourse and Essays," in Stephen Voss, Essays on the Philosophy and Science of Rene Descartes. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Gassendi, Pierre. Institutio Logica, 1658.
Hacking, Ian. The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
Hatfield, Gary. "Science, Certainty, and Descartes", in PSA 1988: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Volume Two. 249-262. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association, 1988.
Hintikka, Jakko. "Aristotelian Induction," in Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34 (1980): 422-40.
Milton, J. R. "Induction before Hume," British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1987): 49-74.
Urbach, Peter. Francis Bacon's Philosophy of Science. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1987.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Is human reasoning rational. Draw on theories of deductive reasoning and your own experience with Sudoku puzzles. Reasoning can be defined as the problems that differ from other kinds of problems in that they often owe their origins to formal systems of logic (Eysenck and Keane (2005). Deductive reasoning is a type of reasoning that leads to conclusions that are definitely true given that statements the conclusion is based on are true. Rationality is the quality or state of being reasonable, based on facts or reason.... [tags: Logic, Reasoning, Deductive reasoning, Inference]
983 words (2.8 pages)
- Since ancient Greece, philosophers have employed logic in their attempts determining what the actual nature of knowledge is and what people can know about it. Logic, as defined by Richard Popkin and Avrum Stroll is “the branch of philosophy that reflects upon the nature of thinking itself,” or the branch of philosophy used to understand the nature of ideas and how they are or are not related to one another (237). Logic can be divided into two major categories, deductive and inductive reasoning, both of which have their merits and limitations.... [tags: Logic, Reasoning, Epistemology]
933 words (2.7 pages)
- In answering the above question I would firstly clarify it 's meaning or my interpretation of it. My argument is not based on the question of whether induction itself is rational, as in is it a logical process. The answer to that question is no, however can it be rationally justified. in other words can a rational argument be made to justify its use in relation to acquiring knowledge I will argue that yes it can. Furthermore I will argue that this is indeed what Hume meant when he made the distinction between applying induction as an agent and logically critiquing induction from the perspective of the philosopher.... [tags: Logic, Reasoning, Deductive reasoning]
1105 words (3.2 pages)
- Differences between deductive and inductive arguments Arguments can either be deductive or inductive depending on the sort of relation the author of the argument decides to take to be between the premise and the conclusion. To avoid the confusion of the two arguments, one needs to understand the differences between them. Below are some of the absolute differences between deductive and inductive arguments. Firstly, a deductive is a kind of an argument that is expected to be entirely valid. The arguer assumes it to provide a full guarantee of the truth concerning the conclusion is given that the argument’s assumptions are accurate (Hitchcock, 2012).... [tags: Logic, Reasoning, Inductive reasoning, Analogy]
1166 words (3.3 pages)
- I. Conceptual Clarification A sound deductive argument, within the context of finding a definite answer, requires that, “it is both valid, and all of its premises are actually true.” (“Validity and Soundness”) In other words, a deductive argument is sound if the ‘things’ that it is standing on are real, and it relates these things in a way that logically leads to the argument’s conclusion. For example, a sound deductive argument could follow that, “If I fill up my car with gas, I will not wind up with an empty tank.... [tags: Logic, Argument, Inductive reasoning, Reasoning]
762 words (2.2 pages)
- Welcome to lesson two. In this lesson it is very easy for us as police officers to get a little bit lost in the some of the technical language of logic. I really ask you to trust me and be patient. I’m not trying to turn you into philosophy students and ask you to draw venn diagrams or anything like that, but I am going to ask you to learn some of the basic terminology of what makes an argument a sound argument. In particular importance to us to as police officer is the understanding of when an argument is lacking validity or is false and one of the biggest ways that we can find those moments is when we look at fallacies, so we are going to spend some time looking at fallacies in this modul... [tags: Logic, Fallacy, Police, Ad hominem]
722 words (2.1 pages)
- Logic’s Role in Deriving Knowledge The terms logic and knowledge are easily confused on a daily basis, and some even believe they are the same concept. Logic has a variety of meanings, but the most common way of describing it is the structure of the relationship between concepts. Knowledge on the other hand is classified as justified true belief. These two concepts are closely related and logic actually plays a huge role in deriving knowledge. Without logic it would be nearly impossible to classify good reasoning from bad reasoning, and in this case also affect the way we derive knowledge.... [tags: Logic, Reasoning, Inductive reasoning]
1036 words (3 pages)
- Introduction Mathematical reasoning that to nowadays represents more essential to said verbal reasoning, plays a fundamental role in the development of our life and the progress of humanity. Areas such as, physics, social sciences, management and computer science. But in computing, we need more of a particular branch of the so-called mathematics: discrete mathematics. Discrete mathematics has become popular thanks to their applications in computer science. Notations and concepts of discrete mathematics are used to study problems in algorithmic and programming.... [tags: Mathematics, Logic, Algorithm, Mathematical logic]
1013 words (2.9 pages)
- Philosophy 103: Introduction to Logic The Nature of Logic Abstract: Some of the uses of logic are illustrated, and deductive arguments are briefly distinguished from inductive arguments. I. Logic is the study of the methods and principles used in distinguishing correct from incorrect reasoning. B. Logic differs from psychology in being a normative or a prescriptive discipline rather than a descriptive discipline. 1. I.e., it prescribes how one ought to reason; it's not concerned with how one actually does reason.... [tags: essays research papers]
1010 words (2.9 pages)
- Faithful and Fruitful Logic Appropriate for a conference relating philosophy and education, we seek ways more faithful than the truth-functional (TF) hook to understand and represent that ordinary-language conditional which we use in, e.g., modus ponens, and that conditional’s remote and counterfactual counterparts, and also the proper negations of all three. Such a logic might obviate the paradoxes caused by T-F representation, and be educationally fruitful. William and Martha Kneale and Gilbert Ryle assist us: "In the hypothetical case in which p, it is inferable, on the basis that p and at least in the given context, that q." "Inferable" is explained.... [tags: Logic Philosophy Papers]
3200 words (9.1 pages)