In today's world, one could split our country into two groups. One is those who are for animal rights in every aspect, and the other is those who are not. Those who are for animals' rights are commonly labeled "Vegans" by people of the opposing viewpoint, and sometimes even by their own. These people may belong to certain organizations such as PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or ALF, the Animal Liberation Front. These people commonly believe that animals should have every right that a human has. Animal Rights Activists generally think that people don't have the right to eat, own, hunt, or use animals in any way, or for any reason. This would mean people who eat meat on a daily basis would just be out of luck. This would mean no person would be allowed to own any animal for work on ranches or farms, for companionship, or for any other reason. This would mean all guides and hunters would have no business. This would mean no person could use any animal part for clothing. This would also mean that more than half of the medicines and medical advances that we enjoy and live as a result of today would never have been discovered, and we would not be making progress on what we are in the medical field. The other people, those who are not, believe that animals should be handled with care and taken care of, but don't believe animals should have every right that humans do.
One of the reasons that vegans don't believe we should eat animals is because we don't have the right to eat them. They believe that those animals have the same exact rights that humans have. The animals feel pain and have the exact same feelings that human beings do. What these people don't realize ...
... middle of paper ...
... using their companionship to always have that best friend that will never let us down. Animal rights have gone far enough. There are laws to protect these animals. There doesn't need to be laws that perish our natural instincts and pastimes.
Bender, David L. "Animal Testing" Biomedical Ethics: Opposing Viewpoints. 1987. Minnesota, Greenhaven.
Bender, David "Animal Testing" Biomedical Ethics: Opposing Viewpoints. 1994. California,
Doughney, Michael T. "People Eating Tasty Animals" People Eating Tasty Animals. 9 Dec. 2001.
Envirolink Network "Animal Concerns: Pros and Cons" Animal Concerns.1999. (http://express.
Guest Choice Network "Moore Lies From Eco-Extremists" Nanny Headlines. 6 Dec. 2001 (http://Nanny_headlines@burst.sparklist.com).
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Ever hear someone passing judgement on another person because of that person 's race, occupation, hobby, belief, or appearance with no basis to support those claims. In most cases than not, these people are being either stereotyped or misconceptualized. Although not all stereotypes and misconceptions are negative. Stereotypes and misconceptions are not the same as discrimination or being prejudice. Prejudice involves attitude and discrimination involves behavior, whereas stereotypes and misconceptions are simply beliefs.... [tags: Nutrition, Veganism, Vitamin, Animal product]
2230 words (6.4 pages)
- “An immediate end to animal research in the United States would be a death sentence for millions of people around the world” (Ericson 108). Without the use of animals, scientists would not be able to improve medical treatments and the human race, as well as the lives of animals, would suffer. Using animals for medical research aids in the understanding of diseases and the development of effective medical treatments for both humans and animals as well as the protection of the safety of humans. Medical breakthroughs in the past justify the importance of animal testing and the need for its continuance.... [tags: Animal testing, Medical research, Medicine, Blood]
1369 words (3.9 pages)
- Animal Experimentation: Granted for the Good The fight for animal rights has been going on for many decades and has increased even more in the past years. Animal rights advocate that animals should be viewed as human beings, not property. These advocates approach the issue from different situations but they all agree that animal should not be used as food, clothing, entertainment, or experimentation. Vivisection is one right that has gained more controversy than all the others. Vivisection is the act of operating or experimenting on live animals.... [tags: Animal Research]
625 words (1.8 pages)
- Its’ another morning and the room is white. There are bars all around and the smell of cleaner is everywhere. Soon I see a person holding a tube of something. The person is coming towards me. Suddenly I’m out of the bars and sitting on a table. The person held me down and put the tube against me. It burns. I want to run but cant. My heart rate goes up and I start to tremble. This will be done several times a day with several different tubes. Law requires I get pain medication but it is minimal and wears off quickly.... [tags: Animal Rights ]
852 words (2.4 pages)
- Why do we as humans feel as if testing on animals will somehow lead us to great findings and advances in medicines and cosmetics. As if an animal has the same DNA as us or the same genes. What if the animal on the testing table was your beloved dog or cat. Would you then think differently about the products you 're buying. The human race is nothing like the animals we test on. It is selfish of us to use animals for our own personal reasons. Although there are many reasons we as humans test on animals there are also many more reasons we should not.... [tags: Animal testing, Human, Animal rights]
1563 words (4.5 pages)
- The argument as to whether or not animal testing should be done has been going on for decades. Medical laboratories and shelters are common places where most animals are tested. Animals are typically used because they are cheap and easily obtainable. Some believe that the usage of animals is morally and ethically wrong because animals are still considered thinking and breathing living things. Others believe that because they are not human, that they can do whatever they want with them. The implementation of laws has also been in discussion to avoid inhumane treatment of animals.... [tags: animal rights, inhumane treatment of animals]
1035 words (3 pages)
- Animal Experimentation Analysis Asking just about any animal rights activists on the thoughts of animal testing, it is virtually unquestionable that the majority of them would come across the thought of some of the laws in regards to animals and how animals are “protected” by these laws. Trained scientists and researchers take on the key role of testing on animals in laboratories and facilities throughout the world. Simply in the United States alone, there are very few laws protecting animals from the unnecessary amounts of suffering the researchers force upon them with many broad exceptions.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1251 words (3.6 pages)
- For years now people have been using animal experimentation to create new ways to help save the human race. There are people who believe that it does help, and that it is necessary to continue, while others oppose and want to fight for the elimination of animal experimentation. Scientists fight for the cures needed to help man kind, but struggle to do so as people fight against their work in progress. But as Jennifer A. Hurley stated, “History has already shown that animal experimentation is not essential to medical progress.” Stuart W.G.... [tags: Animal Rights]
822 words (2.3 pages)
- When it comes to animals and their rights, there is a definite line between our needs and our taking advantage of those species that we consider inferior. As long as man has existed he has been carnivorous, and the same holds true for many other species of animals. Animals are a necessity to humans for survival, whether it be for food, clothing, etc. However, the unnecessary torture of animals through testing is not a necessity for human survival. When it comes to the needless torture of animals that we claim to benefit, the animals lives need to be taken into consideration.... [tags: Animal Testing]
1951 words (5.6 pages)
- George Orwell’s political satire “Animal Farm” makes some interesting contrasts between the patriotic character of Old Major, an older majestic looking pig, and Napoleon, a pig who seems to bide his time waiting for the right moment to seize control for his own evil purpose. Old Major makes a patriotic speech to the assembled group, expounding the virtues of animalism (socialism) In effect he is calling for a utopian socialism in which the community must sacrifice for the collective well being of its members.... [tags: Animal Farm Essays]
828 words (2.4 pages)
- Welfare Reform: Promoting Independence and Self-Reliance
- The Need to Eliminate the Abusive Treatment of Muslim Women
- Capital Punishment Essay - We Should Not Exclude Juveniles
- The Unexpected Downside of Science Explored in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World
- Use of Symbolism in Joseph Heller's Catch-22
- Holden's Mentality in J.D. Salinger's The Catcher In The Rye