The issue of human morality has always been widely controversial and vitally important; it is our anchor that we use to define the humane yet we cannot agree on its dimensions. Morality seems to be all that separates us from the unfeeling universe, which is filled with morally horific natural laws such as "survival of the fittest." Or, at least, such "callous" impartiality seems unjust to our modern societies. Behind the screens of prosperity and enlightentment we have the luxory of moral scrutiny -- a luxory that should be fully explored and developed as our only wall against the apparent moral abyss of the rest of the universe. With enough investigation, we will realize that animals must be considered as we decide who deserves rights -- and what they are.
There is a fundamental system for establishing rights in others of recognizable consciousness that is (nearly) universal to human beings. Yet, there is significant evidence of varying interpretations of those fundamentals that give rise to many different morals in different cultures. Some believe, perhaps in a cruelly impartial stance, that morality is merely a set of learned rules that varies between cultures. Babies certainly do (eventually) develop morally -- kindergarten is as much a time for learning not to take toys from others as the alphabet. Still, this claim should not be taken too far -- even across huge cultural gaps there are similarities in philosophy and morality. The golden rule shows up in various forms, composed independently by many cultures. It may be safe to assume that simply being a society encourages such togetherness and morality, but as we are social creatures such a concession only furthers the point for animal rights as we are not the only so...
... middle of paper ...
...mesh. "What Mother Nature Teaches Us About Motherhood." Time 155.19 (8 May 2000): 4 pp. Academic Search Elite. EBSCOhost. 3043084. Owens Lib., Maryville, MO. 15 Nov. 2002
Newman, Aline Alexander. "Do Animals Have Feelings?" National Geographic World .310 (June 2001): 6 pp. Masterfile Elite. EBSCOhost. 4570708. Owens Lib., Maryville, MO. 16 Nov. 2002
Perry., Denise. "Touching Look at Animal Feelings." Animals 128.4 (July 1995): 2/3 pp. Masterfile Elite. EBSCOhost. 9507250122. Owens Lib., Maryville, MO. 16 Nov. 2002
Regan, Tom. "The Case for Animal Rights." The Norton Reader. Ed Linda H. Peterson, John C. Brereton, Joan E. Hartman. 10th ed. New York: Norton, 2000.
Cartmill, Matt. "Animal minds, animal dreams." Natural History 107.2 (Mar 98):2541 words. Academic Search Elite. EBSCOhost. 461356. Owens Lib., Maryville, MO. 4 Nov. 2002.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The issue of human morality has always been widely controversial and vitally important; it is our anchor that we use to define the humane yet we cannot agree on its dimensions. Morality seems to be all that separates us from the unfeeling universe, which is filled with morally horific natural laws such as "survival of the fittest." Or, at least, such "callous" impartiality seems unjust to our modern societies. Behind the screens of prosperity and enlightentment we have the luxory of moral scrutiny -- a luxory that should be fully explored and developed as our only wall against the apparent moral abyss of the rest of the universe.... [tags: Exploratory Essays Research Papers]
2219 words (6.3 pages)
- Do animals deserve to get their rights taken. We are the “Nazis” to the animals. Think about it. According to At issue, from the SIRS data base The use of animals for scientific research has been going on since the ancient Greeks and Romans. The Pro views, animals should be researched on because so far it has helped the development of treatment for anthrax, diabetes, rabies, polio, smallpox and many more. The Con views, animals should not be researched on because animals have thoughts, feelings and desires, also testing on animals is cruel and inhumane and causes millions of deaths of animals.... [tags: Animal testing, Human]
1275 words (3.6 pages)
- Both in and out of philosophical circle, animals have traditionally been seen as significantly different from, and inferior to, humans because they lacked a certain intangible quality – reason, moral agency, or consciousness – that made them moral agents. Recently however, society has patently begun to move beyond this strong anthropocentric notion and has begun to reach for a more adequate set of moral categories for guiding, assessing and constraining our treatment of other animals. As a growing proportion of the populations in western countries adopts the general position of animal liberation, more and more philosophers are beginning to agree that sentient creatures are of a direct moral... [tags: Animal Rights ]
1849 words (5.3 pages)
- “How can otherwise decent citizens do these things. How can they become so insensitive to what they are doing. Don Barnes, who spent sixteen years as a biomedical scientist experimenting on animals, and now heads the Washington, DC office of the National Anti-Vivisection Society, calls the state in which he used to do his work 'conditioned ethical blindness'” (Singer and Gruen 78-80). As a former vivisector, Barnes worked with monkeys and would cut them open while they were still alive. With a primary interest of biological science, vivisectors performed experiments on living animals to advance the understanding of anatomy, physiology, pathology, and pharmacology.... [tags: Ethical issues, experiments on animals]
1193 words (3.4 pages)
- There has been always a debate on the use of the animals in the biomedical research and experimentation. They are being used in this field for centuries now and have proved very beneficial and contributed in medical research far more than expected. With use of animals in research, the medical field has greatly advanced. But in these experiments a large number of animals are killed and animals have to suffer a lot of pain and distress. Considering these pros and corns the question arises, should animals be used in experimentation.... [tags: Animal Rights, Ethical Science]
1962 words (5.6 pages)
- For the morally driven question should animals be used in medical research, the answer is yes. It has been proven over the course history that animals prove insight to many of the medical questions we ask today. As science began to development so did the testing of animals and humans for medical research. Animals prove many insights to how to cure many illness. Animals should be used for medical research, because many of the animals are links to answers that could save the whole human race. For the entire existence of the human race animal testing has always been a part of it.... [tags: Animal testing, Human, Medical research]
1717 words (4.9 pages)
- Should animals suffer for cosmetics. In many countries animals are still used for research. However, it has been a controversial issue that people were supporting it and were against it. People have been arguing for many years against it. First of all, I read an article from PETA (People for the ethical Treatment of animals) which reported growing opposition to animal testing in US. In this I found that many people in the US are against it which made me think to find out more about it. Scientists believe that animal testing is acceptable because it is used for diseases.... [tags: Animal testing, Testing cosmetics on animals]
1172 words (3.3 pages)
- Heart attacks, bladder failure, and lack of medical cures are all very serious problems that are killing people today. How can doctors learn more about these medical difficulties. Through animal testing doctors can obtain valid results regarding these medical problems and create cures for people with many other medical difficulties. The progression of medicine and the day to day life styles of the general population rely on the ethical practice of animal testing. The alternatives to animal testing are not very valid.... [tags: essays research papers fc]
1748 words (5 pages)
- Biomedical Testing on Animals Animal testing for medical purposes has a positive effect the animals as well as humans. A new development in the medical field recently is the artificial heart, before scientists develop new models in the medical field, it is obvious they have to have a “guinea pig” to begin their experimentation. In this instance, it was Meeko the calf. Fourteen hours earlier, I'd watched doctors lift Meeko's heart from his body and place it, still beating, in a plastic dish. He looked no worse for the experience, whisking away a fly with his tail as he nibbled, demonstrably alive—though above his head, a monitor showed a flatlined pulse.... [tags: scientitsts, medical field]
779 words (2.2 pages)
- Vivisection Many people today, including scientists and doctors, are questioning the suffering and killing of animals for the sake of human beings. Is it morally correct to dissect a frog or a worm for the purpose of educating a high school student. On the other hand, must "We study life to protect life" (1:131) The issue of killing animals for the use of biomedical research, education, and cosmetics can be referred as "vivisection". Twenty-five to thirty-five million animals are spared in the U.S.A.... [tags: essays research papers]
1461 words (4.2 pages)