of strict liability within criminal law system is a necessary means
for combating crime, and if there is any justification for its use.
Strict liability is the placing of liability upon the defendant(s),
regardless of whether or not mens rea is present. This can include
instances of negligence, carelessness or accident. There are a number
of arguments for and against strict liability, and this essay will
identify and explore these arguments.
It is often argued that by promoting high standards of care, strict
liability protects the liberty of the public from dangerous practices.
Barbara Wootton (Crime and Criminal Law: reflections of a Magistrates
and Social Scientist, 1981, p.256-258) defends strict liability on
this basis, suggesting that the objective of criminal law is to
prevent ‘socially damaging activities’. In support of this, it is
suggested by Elliot and Quinn (Criminal Law, 2000, p.32) that-
‘It would be absurd to turn a blind eye to those who cause harm due to
carelessness, negligence or even an accident’.
This approach appears to be stringent. One might be inclined to
suggest that accident is part of human nature, and in applying strict
liability to even the most honest mistakes, a satisfactory outcome may
not be achieved. One example of this is found in Smedleys v Breed
(1974). The defendants were convicted under the Food and Drugs act
1955, after a caterpillar was found in a tin of peas. Despite the fact
that individual inspection of each pea would not have prevented the
offence being committed, Lord Hailsham defended the imposition of
... middle of paper ...
...seen as being morally unsatisfactory.
List of Cases
Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v Attorney-General of Hong Kong  AC1, PC
29, 30, 31, 33, 34
Smedleys v Breed  AC 839;  2 All ER 21;  2 WLR 525
Elliott, Catherine & Quinn, Frances (2000) ‘Criminal Law- 3rd
Molan, Michael (2003) ‘Criminal Law- 4th edition’, Old Bailey Press
Roe, Diana (2002) ‘Criminal Law- 2nd edition’, Hodder and Stoughton
Smith, J.C & Hogan, B (1992) ‘Criminal Law’ London: Butterworths
Wootton, Barbara (1981) ‘Crime and the Criminal Law: reflections of a
Magistrates and Social Scientist’, Oxford: Clarendon
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Exploring Strict Liability Strict liability is a legal doctrine in tort law that makes a person responsible for the damages caused by their actions regardless of culpability (fault) or mens rea. The plaintiff needs only to prove that the tort happened and that the defendant was responsible. Neither good faith nor the fact that the defendant took all possible precautions are valid defences. Strict liability often applies to those engaged in hazardous or inherently dangerous ventures.... [tags: Papers]
977 words (2.8 pages)
- Chapter Three - Causation in the Criminal Law Chapter three allowed me to discover many new concepts including the legal definition of death, the difference between factual and legal causation, the difference between active and passive euthanasia, what assisted suicide is, and that there can be more than one cause of death. Much of this chapter focused on focused on causation. “ In all cases where consequences are an essential element of the actus reus, it is clear that the Crown must prove that "but for" the actions of the accused, the prohibited consequences would not have occurred.” (Lecture Slide, Sept 24(2) PPT) The consequences of someone’s actions must be foreseeable, and there... [tags: Criminal law, Murder, Assault, Euthanasia]
1463 words (4.2 pages)
- 1. What is the definition of an "ex post facto" law and why are they unfair. Ex post facto is a law that retroactively changes the lawful results of activities that were conferred, or connections that existed, before the authorization of the law. It is out of line since it might criminalize activities that were lawful when perpetrated; it might exasperate a wrongdoing by bringing it into a more extreme class than it was in when it was carried out; it might change the discipline recommended for a wrongdoing, as by including new punishments or broadening sentences; or it might modify the tenets of confirmation so as to make conviction for a wrongdoing likelier than it would have been the poin... [tags: Criminal law, Law, Common law, Crime]
1434 words (4.1 pages)
- 1. The term law is a system of principles and processes on which people in a society deal with problems and disputes then seeking to solve or settle them without resorting to any force. The sources in which the law is derived are common law, statutory law and administrative law. 2. The term precedent is a judicial decision that may be used as a standard in subsequent similar cases. Res Judicata means the thing is decided either acted on or decided by the courts. Stare Decisis which means let the decision stand.... [tags: Common law, Law, Tort, Tort law]
1026 words (2.9 pages)
- Criminal Liability “In a just society criminal liability should never be imposed without some degree of blameworthiness” Offences of strict liability are those, which do not require any mens rea with regards to at least one or more of the actus rea. The mens rea usually requires intention and or recklessness. However some crimes are possible to commit without any knowledge, intention or responsibility on behalf of the defendant.... [tags: Papers]
556 words (1.6 pages)
- The purpose of this essay is to discuss whether religion should ever impact criminal law. The question of if it is desirable for religion to impact criminal law is endemic. Advocates of a strict application of the separation between church and state may eschew any notion of this being desirable. However, it is submitted that religion impacts criminal law and vice versa. To deny this would be erroneous. In a religious plurality, the law has a fastidious task of treating religious groups equally – the State must not give a preferential treatment to one particular religion.... [tags: Law and Religion]
2889 words (8.3 pages)
- Introduction 1. The concept of insanity and its possible use as a defence in the negation of criminal liability first appeared in R v Arnold. Tracy J put forward that if an offender is "totally deprived" of their "understanding and memory", then they should never be subject to punishment. The notion of criminal insanity was further developed in R v Hadfield. This case lead to The Criminal Lunatics Act 1800 being passed; to allow for the detention of insane individuals. 2. This report will concern itself, however, with the current law and it's efficacy for dealing with the 'insane'.... [tags: Negation of Criminal Liability, Current Law]
1350 words (3.9 pages)
- Civil Law is a branch of law that matters itself with disputes that involve private parties, or negligent acts that cause harm to others. This is in contrast to criminal law which is invoked for the public purpose. Under civil law, there are remedial awards unlike in criminal law which is punitive in nature. These remedies can either be under tort or contract law. To understand the civil liabilities and or remedies demanded between Andy, Sam and Bob, this can only do so if there is an appreciation of the existence of a contract between them.... [tags: Civil Law, contract, civil liabilities]
1358 words (3.9 pages)
- English Law's Uses of the Concept of Fault When Deciding Liability or Guilt Fault is regarded as blame, or responsibility for doing something wrong. This concept of fault is integral to the English legal system when it comes to deciding guilt of liability. In fact, in many areas of law if fault could not be assigned, the system would fall apart as liability can only be found if fault is established first. Fault is particularly important to Tort law, where fault is often a requirement of the mens rea.... [tags: Papers]
960 words (2.7 pages)
- Mens rea known as the “mental element” of an offence has long been regarded as a crucial factor in criminal law, aiming to ensure that only those who are blameworthy are punished for crimes thus inputting the role of fairness into the criminal law system. H.L.A Hart agreed with this fairness rationale arguing that it would be wrong to convict and punish anyone who had not been given ‘a fair opportunity’ to exercise the capacity for ‘doing what the law requires and abstaining from what it forbids.’ “The general rule is that no crime can be committed unless there is mens rea.” But this is departed from when creating strict liability offences.... [tags: fairness, liability, law]
744 words (2.1 pages)