Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the concept of knowledge truw belief
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the concept of knowledge truw belief
The Importance of Disctinction Between Knowledge and Belief in Philosophy
To try and decipher the distinction between knowledge and belief we
must first understand what the meaning of Philosophy is. In its
simplest definition it translates to “the love of wisdom” taken from
the Greek word “philo” which means love and “sophia” meaning wisdom.
Philosophers love to know the truth about the general principles of
the world and they pursue the truth in these. Through the ages many
philosophers have been on a personal quest to discover the principles
of the universe and explain what is meant by knowledge and belief.
An opinion, statement or teaching can be a belief and to believe means
to regard or to accept what is being said is true, but it does not
have to be true to be believable. Descartes (1596–1650) was a
Rationalist; he believed he had to doubt everything known to him to
really understand knowledge. He defined belief as an active state of
mind in which agreement is either given or withheld to the
proposition. Whether he was awake or dreaming he was never in any
doubt that he was thinking and that his thoughts were real, hence his
famous quote “I think therefore I am”.
Others such as Hume (1711-1776) an empiricist went against the ideas
of rationalists, whilst identifying with belief being a particular
state of the mind considered it to be a passive state, which either
occurs or is absent in respect of the given proposition. In other
words we believe what we believe because of ‘custom and habit’. For
instance, the sun rises every day as we know it, so it is fair to
assume it will rise tomorrow morning and the morning after and...
... middle of paper ...
...een put out of his suffering and misery and
that if one were to treat an animal in this way would they not be
chastised for being cruel to animals. However, I have to consider if I
was faced with the same decision would I rather he were alive in some
form or would I be brave enough to let him go and grieve his death.
For all the opinions, beliefs, philosophical hypothesis, ethics and
morals there is no right answer but having an understanding of these
matters can help and guide us when faced with a medical decision that
will never be easy to make.
* * * * *
Bases on information from:
1. World Library & Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2 Edition
2. http://www.questia.com/Index.jsp?CRID=medical_ethics&OFFID=se1&KEY=medical_ethics
3. Lecture hand out on Bertram Russell
and to deny that its meaning is not completely true in all senses is a
He discusses "animals subjected every year to agonizing research center experiments"(Rifkin) and "raised under the most heartless conditions." He additionally cites that animals are "for butcher and human utilization." These words, words like subjected, coldhearted, and butcher have staggeringly negative meanings and infer thoughts of ruthlessness and viciousness. On the off chance that we take after Rifkin 's reasoning, and animals resemble individuals, and we butcher (for eating no less) and place needles in their eyes in a lab- - that is essentially unsatisfactory. This is the thing that Rifkin need us to get it. For Rifkin, this is the present circumstance however it doesn 't need to be. On the off chance that people comprehend that animals are particularly similar to us, we will need them to be treated with the same admiration and poise. Right now, we are not doing this. However, we can.
Why is it important to know what you believe and why you believe it? While reflecting upon this question I found myself turning to the scripture in 1 Peter 3:15 “But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,” (NIV) Can other’s see your hope in Christ? Are you prepared to tell them what Christ has done in your life? Christians should always be prepared to give an answer when asked about our faith (what we believe and why). 2 Timothy 2:25 states “in humility correcting those who are in opposition, if God, perhaps will grant them repentance, so that they may know the truth, “(NKJV) By knowing what we believe and why we believe it, we, as Christians, are able to listen to question and respond respectfully, while avoiding debate, and those who oppose our belief will be more willing to
The number of animals that are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused adds up to over 100 million each year (11 Facts). Those animals’ lives are just as important as a human life and the lack of respect for these intelligent creatures is astonishing. The
Knowledge is defined as information and skills one acquires through experience or education. There is; however, a certain knowledge than cannot be certain and is unjustifiable from the scientific perspective. Karen Armstrong, Robert Thurman, and Azar Nafisi wrote about this type of knowledge in their essays: “Homo Religiosus,” “Wisdom,” and “Reading Lolita in Tehran,” respectively. Each of these authors has a different view of what knowledge is exactly, how it can be achieved, and what it means to have achieved it, but each author takes on the view that the concept of knowledge should be viewed from a social stance. Armstrong refers to this uncertain knowledge as “myth,” Thurman refers to it as “wisdom,” and Nafisi refers to it as “upsilamba";
treated as such. They will act on instinct and not on reason, and will be harmed by your cruelty. In the story of
Billions of animals are being slaughtered, abused, and harmed every year; causing enormous amounts of pain, suffering and distress upon them. It is wrong for humans to cause extended harm to animals for no compelling reason, for the fact that they have moral statuses. We have obligations to animals, and these are not simply grounded in human interests. However, the issues of moral status and equal consideration are far more fundamental and far-reaching in practical impact as DeGrazia have stated. (38) Animals have as much moral status and rights as humans do, and are most definitely worthy of our consideration in their lives.
“It is not your right—based on YOUR traditions, YOUR customs and YOUR habits—to deny animals THEIR freedom so you can harm them, enslave them and kill them. That’s not what rights are about. That’s injustice.”
“There can be many reason for animal cruelty, like any other form of violence, is often committed by a person who feels powerless, unnoticed, or under control of others. Some who are cruel to animals copy acts what they have seen or that have been done to them, others see harming an animal as a safe way to get revenge against--or threaten-- someone who cares about that animal”. (“Animal… Statistics”) Concerns towards abusing animals have gone up in the past. Although there are not many cases on animal abuse, many have occurred. Abusers are charged with Criminal Animal Abuse and then sentenced to life in prison. Some animals that are physically abused are sometimes rescued by Animal Control, and are taken it to an animal shelter. However, many shelters have not had the space to keep the animals so the workers would have to put them down (Carol Roach). Researchers have shown that the main animals getting abused are dogs, chickens, horses, and livestock (“Animal...
On the other hand, there are people like myself, who do actually have experience with these animals, who contend that it is the animal’s environment which includes everything from socialization, training, and the love from their owners, which is what makes an animal good or bad. In addition to this argument, even though some of these poor creatures were originally bred to be killers, responsible owners like mysel...
...being violated and if they were, the animals would have no going forward with legal action to fight the injustice. So in regards to this argument, it has lead to the conclusion that individual animals have no moral rights.
Every so often we turn on the news and hear of an animal cruelty case, whether it be animal fighting, hoarding, malnutrition, or over-breeding. Animal cruelty is a serious issue and it was not outlawed until the 1800’s. Judaism, however, has always stressed the importance of proper treatment of animals. Unnecessary cruelty to animals has always been strictly forbidden, and in many cases, animals are supposed to be treated with the same sensitivity as human beings. In fact, the Jewish Code of Law specifically says “It is forbidden, according to the law of the Torah, to inflict pain upon any living creature. On the contrary, it is our duty to relieve the pain of any creature, even if it is ownerless or belongs to a non Jew”.
... concept. An animal cannot follow our rules of morality, “Perhaps most crucially, what other species can be held morally accontable” (Scully 44). As a race humans must be humane to those that cannot grasp the concept. Animals do not posess human rights but they posess the right to welfare and proper treatment by their handlers.
... is often what we are taught, even if there is evidence contradicting what we believe.
... to be a part of the human community and should therefore be treated not like humans, but instead as animal members of this ecosystem.