Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Napoleon bonaparte as a military leader
Napoleon bonaparte as a military leader
napoleon bonaparte
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Napoleon bonaparte as a military leader
Napoleon Bonaparte as One of the Greatest Military Leaders of all Time
Napoleon Bonaparte is considered one of the greatest military leaders
of all time. His victories were decisive, powerful and brought
greatness to a suffering France. His military power reigned supreme
for over fifteen years until the drive that got him to where he was
brought him to ruin. The question that I am plagued by is; How was
Napoleon able to win almost every battle so decisively? His forces
were often out numbered and out supplied but some how Napoleon was
still able to defeat the opposing forces. This paper hopes to answer
that question and; Why was his generalship considered to be so
genius? These questions will be answered through extensive research
using reliable sources.
Summary of evidence
Napoleon Bonaparte was born on August 15, 1769, in Ajaccio, Corsica,
and was given the name Napoleone (in French his name became Napoleon
Bonaparte). Through his fatherÂ’s influence, Napoleon was educated at
the expense of King Louis XVI, at Brienne and the École Militaire, in
Paris. Napoleon graduated in 1785, at the age of 16, and joined the
artillery as a second lieutenant.
After the revolution began, he became a lieutenant colonel (1791) in
the Corsican National Guard. In 1793, however, Corsica declared
independence, and Bonaparte, a French patriot and a Republican, fled
to France with his family. He was assigned, as a captain, to an army
besieging Toulon, a naval base that, aided by a British fleet, was in
revolt against the republic. Replacing a wounded artillery general, he
seized ground where his guns could drive the British fleet from the
...
... middle of paper ...
...often used was to move his troops into the heart of the
opposing troops splitting them into two. On the Battlefield Napoleon
was nothing more than ordinary but he gained most of his advantages in
the movement and placement of his Troops.
NapoleonÂ’s true talent was his ability to motivate his troops even
under the bleakest conditions. The Irony in this is the fact that
Napoleon stood a mere five foot two and really wasnÂ’t someone the
troops could look up to but Napoleon was able to appeal to the troops
with all of his interaction. He made himself appear to be a common
troop that experienced the same hardships that they did. This was
exemplified by Napoleon being there every step of the way in the
battle, often seen in the heart of the battle. The troops admired
Napoleon for this and really connected with him.
Although he inspired new social, economic, and political ideas, Napoleon Bonaparte is better known for his military tactics. Even today, his battle plans are used and studied by many in the military. Napoleon, who started out as an extremely short and wimpy foreigner who rose to become Emperor of France, died in 1821 at St. Helena, a remote island in the South Atlantic. He was fifty-two years old. Th cause is uncertain: either he was poisoned or he died of a stomach ailment.
French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte is remembered as one of the greatest minds in military history. His revolutionary approach to warfare changed the course of history and the principles which governed his style of leadership are still valued today. Although he had an illustrious career of over 25 years and expanded the French Empire from Portugal to Russia, his reign came to end at the hands' of his enemies. The Battle of Waterloo was Napoleon's last stand as a military commander and will be examined for his use of the principles of the operations process. Napoleon failed to implement these activities effectively and is ultimately responsible for the loss of the battle. Napoleon was able to lead his men, but was unable to overcome his failures. He failed to understand the operational environment which affected his subordinates ability share an understanding of the environment. He failed to direct his forces and functions which lead to the loss of initiative and lacked in violence of action. Finally, Napoleon failed to assess the battle continuously and accurately which kept him from adapting when necessary. After a hard fought battle at Waterloo, Napoleon was defeated.
Napoleon Bonaparte ruled in France from 1789 to 1815. Napoleon came to power in 1789 and immediately became a powerful figure in the French government. However, some thought Napoleon was such a great leader. The Napoleonic Empire started to grow France’s territories. Some might have believed that Napoleon was too eager with his rule, while losing and failing to succeed against the power of England, in an attempt to blockade their trade, and of Russia, where he led his army to a defeat and retreat back to France. Even in his success over Spain, the battle still costed Napoleon and his army in men and resources. Napoleon was mostly viewed as a powerful and militaristic leader in some aspects, but others saw him as a coward and terrible leader in other ways.
Napoleon Bonaparte was an interesting ruler in that he was compromised of attributes of both a tyrant and a hero. Napoleon had a strong following throughout his reign and even during his two exiles. He was the emperor of France between 1799 and 1815, following the fall of the Directory. Despite the efforts of the French Revolution to rid the country of an autocratic ruler, Bonaparte came to power as Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte I in 1804. He claimed that he preserved the goals of the Revolution, which can be easily argued as his rule became more dictatorial as it progressed. Despite his departure from some of the gains of the Revolution, he overall was a hero for the French people. Through his military ventures, political changes and social reform, Napoleon proved himself as a hero. This is not to say that there were aspects of his reign that were tyrannical, but he was overall beneficial for France.
Napoleon Bonaparte can be described as a Hero or Tyrant and it may even be a fair assertion to suggest he was both. Napoleon ended the French Revolution after 10 years of political and economical instability, he implemented significant civil reform, he implemented the ideals of the Revolution by advancing people from all ranks of society and he sowed the seeds of a free democratic republic to neighboring countries mired in their own outdate regimes.
Napoleon Bonaparte was a great military leader and commander, he had a fantastic eye for detail and a phenomenal memory. Though he was not always completely honest with his colonies, and he often took advantage of their valuables, Napoleon was very brave, strong-minded and he knew how to retrieve followers everywhere he went.
Should Napoleon Bonaparte Be Considered A Hero? What is a hero? A hero can be defined as a common man who rises to greatness on the basis of sheer talent. Should Napoleon Bonaparte be considered a hero?
Napoleon was an outstanding military commander and enjoyed many successful campaigns. Napoleon maintained the Revolutionary syst...
The rich history of Europe is a beautifully created story ranging from romance, art, and prosperity, to bloody warfare, world powers, and deception. Certain rulers, whether monarchs, dictators, or a body of people in power, have shown clear traits of their true purposes. Possibly being either angelic, and looking out for the good of the world, or sinister, selfish, and searching for domination. The majority of dictators are frowned upon, however some were considered saviors, heros, legends to the people. Napoleon, however, is not one of these mythical people. Napoleon Bonaparte was a prodigious general of warfare, having gone to military school at the age of 9, and succeeding exceptionally. He won a series
The assumption held by many that Napoleon Bonaparte was a brilliant general and an exceptional leader is debatable when the Frenchman’s many mistakes are revealed. Bonaparte was born to a wealthy family with previous political connections (Wilde 1). He entered a military academy at only nine years old and entered the French Army Artillery Regiment seven years later (Wilde 1). As Bonaparte moved up in the military ranks, he made himself known with his political opinions and his successful leadership of the revolutionaries’ armed forces (Wilde 1). As he became more famous, Bonaparte threw open the gates to his path to power. Thus began the era of Napoleon, a time of absolute power, vast reform, and relentless military invasions led by a man loved by the extensive majority of French citizens. However, Bonaparte’s likeable wit and seemingly military genius masked his faults. Although the French Revolution was a coup d’état to remember, it was tainted by Napoleon Bonaparte’s hasty rise to power, by his numerous military misjudgments, and by the liberty-diminishing actions and changes that he forcibly brought to Europe.
Napoleon Bonaparte once stated that “History is written by the winners”. History now remembers Napoleon as one of the greatest war generals of all time. From his early life, until his death, Napoleon displayed commendable military might on the battlefield. Having ever only lost two battles, Napoleon managed to bring Europe to its knees through his innovative military tactics and talent on the battlefield. Although Napoleon had many great victories, some historians argue that Napoleon was not a military genius, but rather he won his battles by luck. This viewpoint is invalid because Napoleon won over 50 battles in his lifetime, and most of his battles were against armies with superior numbers armies. Even Napoleon’s greatest rival, The Duke of Wellington, considered “Napoleon's presence in the field equal to forty thousand men”. Therefore, luck is a superficial factor, and we should accept that Napoleon was a military genius. The battles of Austerlitz, Marengo, and Pyramids were among the greatest displays of Napoleon’s military prowess. To fully understand the extent of Napoleon’s genius, analysis of the battles is required.
Napoleon had great strategy one it comes to fight the enemies. His tactics was to move quickly and attack the opposing army, take them down and take over the country. He will than go back and start planning the next attack.
Napoleon is remembered as a great military commander but his tactics was no unknown there were many military theorist but Napoleon refined it but you must understand that he was an effective administrator because of his reforms like introduction the merit system back into the French system.
How did a man with a promising military career loose it so quickly? Napoleon was one of the greatest military minds but did not always use it correctly, which eventually led to his downfall. This essay will explain what led to the downfall of Napoleon.
Napoleon Bonaparte is one of the famous figures in French history by the importance of his internal reforms. However, he remains primarily in global memory as one of the greatest military commanders in history. Indeed, Napoleon Bonaparte delivered more battles than Alexander the Great, Hannibal, or Caesar. His campaigns covered all Europe from Spain to Russia, without forgetting the East with Egypt and Syria. The French Emperor entered in the prestigious capitals of Europe, Milan, Vienna (twice), Berlin, Madrid and Moscow. Napoleon has greatly influenced the Western way of war, not only by the new organization of armies, but also by the optimization of different capabilities and the combination between leadership and creativity in the battlefields.