Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
overcrowding in prisons
possitive affects of prison
overcrowding in prisons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: overcrowding in prisons
Bail in Law " The Law relating to bail strikes a fair balance between the
unconvicted person's right to remain at liberty while awaiting trial,
and the need to protect the public against the commission of further
offences"
Bail in law, procurement of release from prison of a person awaiting
trial or an appeal, by the deposit of security to insure his
submission at the required time to legal authority. The monetary value
of the security-known also as the bail, or, more accurately, the bail
bond-is set by the court having jurisdiction over the prisoner. The
security may be cash, the papers giving title to property, or the bond
of private persons of means or of a professional bondsman or bonding
company. Failure of the person released on bail to surrender himself
at the appointed time results in forfeiture of the security. Bail is
usually granted in a civil arrest. Courts have greater discretion to
grant or deny bail in the case of persons under criminal arrest, e.g.,
it is usually refused when the accused is charged with homicide. The
Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides
that "excessive bail shall not be required," but it does not provide
any absolute right to bail.
Between 1979 and 1989, the prison population of England and Wales grew
rapidly, 78% were attributed to the number of unconvicted persons
awaiting trial. The overcrowdin...
... middle of paper ...
...law but it does
increase the prison population.
There are a number of problems with the bail system such as:
Ø A high number of those refused bail are acquitted
Ø Many are eventually given non-custodial sentences
Ø Too many people are being held in custody
Ø Periods of remand are too high.
But there have been several initiatives proposed and some implemented
to assist the system such as:
Ø Bail Support Schemes: they are set up to offer advice, counselling
and surveillance to those who are granted bail
Ø Bail Hostels: these are run by the probation service and offers
accommodation for defendants awaiting trial. This gives the defendant
freedom, whilst at the same time supervision.
Ø The government are currently preparing a Criminal Justice Bill,
which would Further restrict the use of bail.
Conclusion: Congress hoped to achieve a greater degree of accuracy in assessing flight and danger of arrestees through establishing the Bail Reform Act of 1984, which set objective guidelines for judicial officers in assessing release conditions including taking into account for the first time the probability an offender will re-offend while on pretrial release. It was also hoped that the Act would bring back the community's trust in bond setting practice. Overall, the benefits of the Bail Reform Act of 1984 do exceed any detriments, but some problems do exist. These problems include the uniformity in the application of the Bail Reform Act of 1984, as well as the interpretation of dangerousness to the community. Through future legislative and executive reform, this Act will go through multiple changes until these issues are addressed.
The two tiers of justice enable law to be effectively enforced in varied circumstances. The necessity for the rule of law to be administered in an “accessible, fair and efficient manner” is thus achieved,
This essay will hold a discussion regarding two main principles: fairness and justice. In particular, to what extent Australian legal system is based on fairness and justice?
The criminal trial process is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society to a great extent. For the law to be effective, the criminal trial process must reflect what is accepted by society to be a breach of moral and ethical conduct and the extent to which protections are granted to the victims, the offenders and the community. For these reasons, the criminal trial process is effectively able to achieve this in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury system.
The use of evidence and witnesses is a mechanism in which the law attempts to balance the rights of victims and offenders in the criminal trial process. Evidence used in court are bound by the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) and have to be lawfully obtained by the police. The use of evidence and witnesses balance the victims’ rights to a great extent. However, it is ineffective in balancing the rights of offenders. The law has been progressive in protecting the rights of victims in the use and collection of evidence and witness statements. The Criminal Procedure Amendment (Domestic Violence Complainants) Bill 2014, which amends the Criminal Procedure Act 1986, passed the NSW Legislative Council on 18 November 2014. The amendment enables victims of
Fairness Doctrine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. (2011, January 15). Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved February 4, 2011, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine
The governance of our present day public and social order co-exist within the present day individual. Attempts to recognize the essentiality of equality in hopes of achieving an imaginable notion of structure and order, has led evidence based practitioners such as Herbert Packer to approach crime and the criminal justice system through due process and crime control. A system where packer believed in which ones rights are not to be infringed defrauded or abused was to be considered to be the ideal for procedural fairness. “I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it.” Thomas Jefferson pg 9 cjt To convict an individual because proper consideration was not taken will stir up social unrest rather then it’s initial intent, when he or she who has committed the crime is not punished for their doings can cause for a repetition and even collaboration with other’s for a similar or greater crime.
The Supreme Court has acknowledged four significant factors in determining the rationality of a prison guideline. Courts should contemplate whether there is a lawful, sensible association between the guideline and the reasonable interest advanced to justify it, whether different means for exercising the proclaimed right continue to exist, whether accommodation of the proclaimed right will unfavorably disturb guards, other inmates, and distribution of prison properties generally, and whether there is an noticeable substitute to the guideline that fully accomm...
...n order to win his/her case or the res gestae which in some cases may require scientific proof. Another area of grave concern in our criminal justice as pertains to bails is the fact that our judges routinely impose excessive and harsh bail terms, which forces the suspect to remain in custody even after being admitted to bail. This tends to suggest that even the judges see the bail stage as the most important part of their work. Also, it tends to show that the judges do not really care about the issues of the constitutional presumptions of innocence and fair hearing. The issue of fair hearing needs to be emphasized at this point because if the suspect is unduly held in detention pending his trial, he may effectively be denied the opportunity to defend himself. Also, an abusive law enforcement agency and prosecutor would see the pre-trial detention due to a denial of
...tive Assembly yet not yet introduced to the Legislative Council, the Bill passed both houses of Parliament. The new Bill’s intention is to allow provision for bail with connection to criminal and other proceedings and replace the Bail Act 1978. The establishment of a new recently developed, straightforward bail system that espouses a risk management approach when deciding whether the accused is granted bail. Under this new legislation authorities must bear in mind the following when considering to grant an accused bail; Does the person present a risk of endangering the communities safety, committing a serious offence, interfering with witnesses or fail to appear at an appointed time? This system will offer greater uniformity by detaching complexities predominately relating to the resumptions scheme, while taking into great consideration the safety of the community.
The principle of bail is basic to our system of justice and its practice as old as English law itself. When the administration of criminal justice was in its infancy, arrest for serious crime meant imprisonment without preliminary hearing and long periods of time could occur between apprehension and the arrival of the King's Justices to hold court. It was therefore a matter of utmost importance to a person under arrest to be able to obtain a provisional release from custody until his case was called. This was also the desideratum of the medieval sheriff, the representative of the Crown in criminal matters,
The force was proportionate to that heading because it was subject to the safeguards that it could only be done after a warrant of arrest had been put out by a magistrate or justice of the peace in respect of an extradition crime and where the evidence laid before he would, in his view, justify the issue of a warrant for the apprehension of a person accused of a similar domestic offense.
The English legal system is complex and there are many ways in which it can be influenced, this essay will explore some of the different, more obvious ways the law can be changed and what this shows in relation to the quote above. First the essay will discuss the different ways the law can be created and changed and who enables and controls those changes, with my primary examples being the common law and legislation for the judicracy and Parliament respectively, then the essay will cover to what extent these powers enable the judicracy to change and create law in relation to Parliament and if it could be discribed as "opportunistic and piecemeal".
Pollock and Wright defines bailment as- " Bailment is a relationship sui generis and unless it is sought to increase or diminish the burden imposed upon the bailee by the very fact of bailment, it is not necessary to incorporate it into the law of contract and to prove a
One component of the definition of justice is the final outcome of the process of the law, whereby justice is distributed by the State. According to this definition, justice is the mechanical process of the structure of law – set in place and agreed to by the people of the State. Another definition is concerned with the value inherent in ‘just’ behavior. One distinction between these two definitions is the difference between an individual viewpoint and the larger view of the society. Either view incorporates the concept of moral judgment; ‘good’ as opposed to ‘bad.’