The idea of democracy is both vague and is often over-simplified to mean "majority rules". In theory, such a notion sounds both just and efficient. However, in practice, the concept of "majority rules" is much more complex and often difficult to implement. Modern-day versions of democracy, such as the one utilized in the United States, simply guarantees a person's right to voice his or her opinion in all matters involving the public. American democracy merely provides a forum for the expression of such viewpoints; it does not guarantee the ability of any individual to bring about change. The Federalists, who were greatly responsible for the ratification of the beloved Constitution of the United States, recognized the impracticality of Jefferson's town-hall democracy and simple "majority rules" and settled on a type of government which could merely guarantee an individual's right to representation. In some regards, the Federalists were pragmatic democrats-supporters of democracy who recognized the shortcomings of the voting public while at the same time suggested certain instruments to protect John Q. Public. The Federalists were opposite of idealists; they were realists. And it is this realism that is directly responsible for the success of democracy within the United States.
Democracy, the ideal, is held dear by most Americans. "What Americans would not do…for the vindication of a fundamental first principle: the right of the people to determine their own future," comments Albert R. Papa in his article "The Allure of Civics Book Democracy". While nearly all Americans recognize the benefits of a democratic nation, the Federalists maintain that often times, minority and ma...
... middle of paper ...
...stem is to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few, the presidential veto hardly accomplishes this goal. Although the president cannot create new law, his ability to prevent new law resembles the power held by a dictator. How democratic can one man's vote be?
The Federalists believed in a form of government that is not consistent with the textbook definition of "majority rules". They believed in a modified version of democracy- a pragmatic type of democracy. They believed in a democracy which sometimes neglects the majority vote in order to ensure the stability of American government. They believed in a democracy which does not blindly put all trust within its elected officials. They believed in a democracy which nurtures the free soul of the American public. Such a democracy is alive and well in the United States. Is America democratic?
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Were the Federalists Democratic. The idea of democracy is both vague and is often over-simplified to mean "majority rules". In theory, such a notion sounds both just and efficient. However, in practice, the concept of "majority rules" is much more complex and often difficult to implement. Modern-day versions of democracy, such as the one utilized in the United States, simply guarantees a person's right to voice his or her opinion in all matters involving the public. American democracy merely provides a forum for the expression of such viewpoints; it does not guarantee the ability of any individual to bring about change.... [tags: Papers]
1002 words (2.9 pages)
- After gaining independence and becoming a republic, America is on the path for setting a new democracy. Trial and error was done with the Article of Confederation and soon came the publishing of the Constitution with ratification by the states which guarantee a new government. Conflicts regarding the passing of the Constitution existed between the Federalists and the anti-federalists which was resolved after the promise for a Bill of Rights. By the 1800, Washington had already retired from presidency and John Adams was the president with another election coming up.... [tags: United States, Thomas Jefferson, Federalism]
822 words (2.3 pages)
- 1. The two main political parties have each changed drastically over time. What are the historical origins of the Democratic Party. Of the Republican Party. What is a party system, and describe at least two party system that have formed over the course of American history. The term party system refers to the organizations, the balance of power and the institutional bases of the country. Though the Founding Fathers, particularly George Washington, warned the nation about becoming a two-party system, America has been a strong two party nation since the 1790s, when the Federalist competed against the Jeffersonian Republicans.... [tags: President of the United States, Democratic Party]
1408 words (4 pages)
- Despite the fact that the Democratic and Republican gatherings in the United States presently appear to be to a great degree polarized, they didn 't begin that way. Truth be told, these two gatherings started as one, single party. This party was known as the Democratic-Republican Party, and it was sorted out by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson in 1791.Although the Democratic and Republican gatherings in the United States presently appear to be to a great degree polarized, they didn 't begin that way.... [tags: Democratic-Republican Party, Democratic Party]
1011 words (2.9 pages)
- Anti-Federalists Eric Foner claims the definition of Federalism refers to the relationship between the national government and the states. Unlike the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation came with many weaknesses. Some provided by our powerpoint include that the Federal government had no power to make the states obey the Articles and laws that were passed by the legislature. The states also had the power to tax, and the opportunity to print their own money. Our powerpoint focuses on the $10 million Congress owed to other countries, as well as the $40 million it owed to the American veterans.... [tags: United States Constitution, Federalism]
853 words (2.4 pages)
- The early years of the Constitution of the United States were full of political strife. The two prominent political ideals were complete opposites. The Jeffersonian Republicans were focused on giving power to the people and maintaining a pastoral economy, while the Federalists supported the control of the government by the elite class, and maintaining “positive” democracy. Both parties feared the influence and effect the other party would have on the public. In Linda K. Kerber's article, “The Fears of the Federalists”, the major concerns Federalists held in the early 19th century are described.... [tags: U.S. Politics ]
1009 words (2.9 pages)
- Once the Constitution was drafted to replace the Articles of Confederation, the feud between the Federalists and Anti-Federalist simmered down because the decision of the Federalist to include the Bill of Rights placated the Anti-Federalists’ fears about the renovations. After the Bill of Rights was implemented, the Anti-Federalists transitioned into the Democratic-Republicans, thus beginning the conflicting views between the two emerging political parties, the Federalists and Democrat-Republicans.... [tags: United States, Federalism, James Madison]
1130 words (3.2 pages)
- When the American Revolution ended, the new nation faced many obstacles. Dealing with the questions of how much power to give the government, how to deal with overwhelming war debt, and how to run a new, independent country all posed a threat if not handled properly. This eventually led to the division of two groups, the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans, who had many conflicting views. As time went on, domestic and foreign affairs throughout the 1790’s increased the tension between the two parties and distinctively separated them.... [tags: John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington]
1735 words (5 pages)
- The Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans were both loyal Americans who sought to empower the United States and wanted nothing more than to see the young nation flourish and grow. But they differed in their philosophy of how the country would be led to thrive. The main differences between them were that the Federalist favored a strong central government, while the Democratic-Republicans favored a strong state government. Another fundamental difference was their idea on how the Constitution was to be interpreted and executed.... [tags: Thomas Jefferson, United States]
1438 words (4.1 pages)
- Federalists VS Jeffersoneans With respect to the federal Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. As history dictates, this is found to be substantially accurate. Federalists were firm believers in the production of a strong central government and a broad interpretation of the Constitution. However, the Democratic Republicans believed that the government should follow a strict interpretation of the Constitution and held the idea that this would allow honest representation of the people and prevent government corruption.... [tags: essays papers]
707 words (2 pages)