I strongly believe that some acts are morally right and others morally wrong. Though in society today I find many different people with many different opinions on this some issues. The way someone was raised or the experiences they have faced could be what has molded these beliefs. The differences between right and wrong are not always the same in each person's head and this is where we face controversy. Morals differ from person to person resulting in confrontations dealing with morality issues. Such as euthanasia, human beings should not have to suffer, just as we do not allow animals to suffer. I believe Pro-Choice is morally right. Woman should be given the choice of whether or not she can terminate her pregnancy. On the flip side, I feel cheating is morally wrong, and puts people at an unfair advantage.
The idea of euthanasia is something that elderly people today face almost every day. I believe that it should be up to the human being suffering, whether or not they want to suffer any longer. As people grow old, they become weaker and more dependent on others naturally. Plus adding a fatal sickness to the scenario and things must seem hopeless. Nobody should have to endure such pain and agony just to save their loved ones the pain of letting them go. We do not let an animal suffer to any extent, as soon as things seem hopeless; we put them to sleep. Not that we should kill anyone at the first sign of illness, but there are many elderly people in convalescent homes just waiting for the day their pain will end. And why do we let these people suffer, because we believe it is morally wrong to kill a human being. But in this scenario I believe it is morally right to grant the wishes of the person in agony...
... middle of paper ...
...rson believes one should earn what they receive, and should have to use hard-earned cash to buy what they wish to have. The idea of things being morally right or wrong is accepted by society because of its simplicity. Things are either morally right or morally wrong and no one has to deal with individual beliefs.
I feel certain things are morally right and others morally wrong. As a society we have accepted the idea of this cut and dry way of thinking. When harm is done to an individual it is seen as morally wrong. When something is done to enhance a person's life then this act is seen as morally right. The way people think is different from one another but the general idea of our way of thinking is the same. One is allowed their opinion and way of thinking but is not allowed the right to do harm to others; this is seen as morally wrong in our society.
I believe laws is what determines what’s wrong and what’s right. Though, there are some people that might not agree with this. For example, a husband is stealing medicine for his sick wife and they’re poor but it’s the only way to save her. The husband still broke the laws but others felt he did right. That’s why there’s a phrase that says, “Sometimes you have to do the wrong thing for the right reason”.
An action is morally good if and only if it promotes my personal happiness and it is morally wrong if and only if that action hinders my personal happiness.
Over many years people have seemed to develop their thinking concerning morality based on resulting in interactions with individuals and social institutions. Different societies have their own cultures that have different ideas about how humans are to behave. Societies
Who decides what is ethical and what is moral? There are no standards of conduct that everyone in the world agrees upon. There are different religions, cultures and ethnicities in this world and because of that; there will most likely never be a day where everyone finds everything that someone else does to be ethical or moral. Since there can never be a universal standard for morality and ethical behavior for people everywhere, we must stop judging people by looking through the lenses of our culture or society . We must judge someone and his actions by the standards of his culture or society. An action one person considers being justifiable behavior may not be the same case for someone else. When cultures and religions cross paths that do
so anything goes. People can basically do whatever they want without consequence. Without morals, there are no ethics or values.
In every civilized society you will always find many varying forms of morality and values, especially in the United States of America. In Societies such as these you find a mosaic of differing religions, cultures, political alignments, and socio economic backgrounds which suggests that morality and values are no different. In Friedrich Nietzsche’s book, Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche discusses morality and the two categories that you will find at the very basis of all varieties of morality. One category of morality focuses on the “Higher Man” and his superiority to all those under him and his caste. The second system is derived from those of a lower caste that may be used by those in higher castes to further themselves and society. These categories as described by Nietzsche are known as Master Morality and Slave Morality. In this modern time in our culture, morality is becoming a more polarizing topic than ever before. Morality is often times held synonymous with religious practice and faith, although morality is an important part of religion and faith, everyone has some variation of morality no matter their religious affiliation or lack thereof. Friedrich Nietzsche’s theories on morality, Master and Slave Morality, describe to categories of morality which can be found at the very basis of most variations of morality. Master and Slave morality differ completely from each other it is not uncommon to find blends of both categories from one person to another. I believe the Master Morality and Slave Morality theories explain not only religious affiliations but also political alignments and stances on certain social issues in American society. By studying the origins and meanings of Nietzsche’s theories, comparing these theories to c...
Morals. Right and wrong. This is what we as everyday human beings struggle with every day. And we aren’t the only ones. Modern day philosophers study this day in and day out, especially those who study metaethics. Metaethics is the study of the foundation of ethics, what it means to be moral. Within metaethics there are three main moral beliefs that are constantly being debated between; moral realism, moral relativism, and moral skepticism. I believe that moral skepticism is the most reasonable standpoint on morality because while morals do exist, they are completely subjective. A person 's sense of morality depends on how they were raised, what they were taught to believe, who they surround themselves with and their personal experiences. After
There are no two people in the world that have the exact same thoughts and feelings. Each person forms their own ideas on certain subjects, that others will disagree with. Many aspects of a person’s thoughts are based on their background. From as early as childhood, a person’s thoughts and opinions start to form, and change based on influences, such as parents or teachers. For example, if a child’s parents raise that child a certain way, that child will likely choose to raise their children the same way. This does not necessarily mean that the parents raised their child the right way, but they raised their child the way that they felt was right. This is to prove that there is no right or wrong. People will develop their own ideas on right and wrong based
Spoken by many people ¨not everything is black and white¨. We can live up to high standards, but everyone makes mistakes every once in awhile. As stated in Merriam Webster to be unethical is morally wrong and uncomforting. Also exclaimed in Merriam Webster to be immoral is to conflict with generally and traditionally help moral principles. It is at times acceptable to be immoral or unethical because it allows us to learn and grow through challenges, no one is perfect, and there are frequently consequences for your actions.
...or right and wrong. She has an appreciation for the underlying purposes served by laws. Oprah believes that “Right” is determined universal ethical principles that all regions or moral authorities might view as compelling or fair.
"What is wrong is wrong, even if everyone is doing it. What is right is right, even if nobody is doing it." Whether or not a group of people are doing the wrong thing, the action will always be wrong. In any case, cheating is simply not a moral thing to do. Yet, many people do it anyways. A person will figure that they won 't get caught. Cheating can happen in a relationship, on a paper or exam. The severity of the wrongdoing depends on what the person did. At some point, mostly everyone will question will ask questions on whether their action is wrong. In most ethical issues, it 's either a white or black area. What someone sees as an action that is completely innocent, another may view it as unethical. Critical thinkers will often justify
Morality is the set of principles concerning the distinction between what is right and what is wrong. All moralities are relative, depending on the circumstances immoral act can be committed for a moral good, certain moralities apply to one set of people and not another because of religion, culture, etc. A simple example of a relative moral is lying; During their childhood, Children are taught that lying is wrong—immoral— but as they gain more life experiences some learn that lying isn’t always wrong, in some situations it helps more than telling the truth, the morality and immorality of lying it is relative to certain situations that different people experience. Since morality is relative, the line between what is right and wrong is blurred;
Whether put simply or scrutinized, morality cannot be defined simply by looking at it from one or two perspectives. One must acknowledge the fact that there are several different factors that affect judgment between “right” and “wrong”. Only after taking into account everything that could possibly change the definition of righteousness can one begin to define morality. Harriet Baber, a professor at San Diego State University, defines morality as “the system through which we determine right and wrong conduct”. Baber refers to morality as a process or method when she calls it a “system”. In saying “we” she then means to say that this concept does not only apply to her but also to everyone else. Through morality, according to her, one can look at an action, idea, or situation and determine its righteousness and its consequences.
Nearly all of mankind, at one point or another, spends a lot of time focusing on the question of how one can live a good human life. This question is approached in various ways and a variety of perspectives rise as a result. There are various ways to actually seek the necessary elements of a good human life. Some seek it through the reading of classic, contemporary, theological and philosophical texts while others seek it through experiences and lessons passed down from generations. As a result of this, beliefs on what is morally right and wrong, and if they have some impact on human flourishing, are quite debatable and subjective to ones own perspective. This makes determining morally significant practices or activities actually very difficult.
For example, religion is a big reason that people do what they see as “right’. The problem with being moral is that who says what is moral and what is not. Like I stated earlier, I think that we are born with an understanding of what is right and that it either is manipulated through time and circumstances, but I understand that it is naive for me to believe that, but I still choose to. That is what the main sections of this class have discussed. Even though we have talked about several different takes on what is morally good and how people have different views I am sure that there are a lot of other views that we didn 't discuss, which makes this topic, so hard to find a definite answer and which is why I can only offer my opinion on