Being reared in the typical capitalist community in the United States, it is much easier for me to relate to the thoughts of Adam Smith. This is not to say that I do not agree with some of the precepts of pure Communism, but like the old adage says, "Communism looks good on paper, but in practice, it is completely ineffective." Historically, this form of government does not tend to succeed because of many factors. Some of these include basic economic differences, individualism, and technology and how it advances or serves as a detriment to the state. My stance is clear: I believe that Adam Smith has the more credible stance. Beginning with the economic side of the discussion Smith takes a Western approach in his thought processes. He states in so many words that workers are continually looking for the best job and the best wage. Marx believes that a wage-labor war will break down society and cause a downfall of the economic structure. The Capitalist belief is that each individual is continually exerting himself to find the most advantageous employment for whatever capital he can command (Smith 15). Smith says also in paragraph 15 that it is human nature for a person to better society while bettering himself. In Adam's opinion each person has the right to the pursuit of happiness, and that each person has to take it in their own hands to advance within society. Marx disagrees by saying that when a person betters himself he does not improve but instead endangers society. For example, when the bourgeois cuts employment because of technology, the bourgeois hurts society by "…instead of rising the laborers with the progress of industry, sinks them deeper below the conditions of existence of their own class...
... middle of paper ...
...both of their ideas. They seem to use similar methods, using logical statements to convey their points that seem to very much contrast each other. Marx’s philosophies deal with improving society for the better to reach industrial prosperity while Smith believes that the incentives of a free market will allow this happen and that human nature will cause Marx’s theory to fail. In the end both men want one common goal which is the best possible economic system for society because both realize that economics is single greatest controller of the major aspects of society.
Works Cited Page Marx, Karl. “The Communist Manifesto.” A World of Ideas. Ed. Lee Jacobus. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998. 209-32.
Smith, Adam. “Of the Principle of the Commercial or Mercantile System.” A World Of Ideas. Ed. Lee Jacobus. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998. 195-205.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The two great minds of Adam Smith and Karl Marx have just as many similarities as they have differences. Both want to help the general populous by reducing poverty. Both have a distaste for big business and elitists. Both believed that the most valuable entity in an economy was labor and the ability to produce goods. Both were philosophers and economists that put great thought into the morals of their economic systems. Despite having common goals and beliefs, they differed in how to achieve an economy that worked for everyone, not just the über wealthy.... [tags: Economics, Capitalism, Adam Smith, Karl Marx]
737 words (2.1 pages)
- As far back as man has been on earth, he has been driven towards building a community among his peers. Whether that is a community of hunters and gatherers who share whatever the day has brought to them within their tribe, or a larger community which within its structure lie the inner dwellings of division of labor and societal classes. Adam Smith (18th Century), John Stuart Mill (19th Century), and Karl Marx (19th Century) are of the same cloth, but in modern terms their community is referenced as a government, and they each have their own distinct opinions on the 'drive' instilled within human nature that shape their personal economic theories.... [tags: Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, Karl Marx]
1775 words (5.1 pages)
- Many historical figures have different views on how a country should be governed. Two in particular are Karl Marx and Adam Smith. Both men are best known for their opinions on how a country’s economy ought to be run. Adam Smith believes in capitalism, while Karl Marx would rather have a socialist economy. They expressed entirely new ideas that nations still follow today. These two men have completely different views on the class system, economy, and government of a nation. Adam Smith was a Scottish economist and is known as the “father of modern economics”.... [tags: Marxism, Socialism, Capitalism, Karl Marx]
1015 words (2.9 pages)
- Business and Society Ryan Malloy Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx Professor Kushner 9/17/15 Both Karl Marx and Adam Smith were greatly respected economists during the 18th and 19th centuries. They both viewed society, the economy and politics in different ways. Smith viewed capitalism and the free market as a necessity to society while Marx believed that the bourgeoisie and the proletariat were the two classes that would constantly be fighting between each other. Marx believes that the government needs to intervene to help the working class and that the class system needs to be taken down completely.... [tags: Marxism, Working class, Karl Marx, Socialism]
1095 words (3.1 pages)
- Throughout our history as a western civilization, we have made technologic advances and innovations that have furthered ourselves as a society and benefited us greatly by improving the quality of life. However, with these advantages there are also the disadvantages; these advances have also integrated injustice and inequality into our society. Through the writings of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith, and Karl Marx, it can be shown how our western society has spiraled into a system of inequality amongst its communities.... [tags: Karl Marx, Capitalism, Jean-Jacques Rousseau]
855 words (2.4 pages)
- Comparing Adam Smith and Karl Marx Smith and Marx agree upon the importance of capitalism as unleashing productive powers. Capitalism is born out of the division of labour... that is, it is made possible by dividing jobs up into simple tasks as a way of increasing efficiency. By increasing efficiency, then everyone can produce more than they personally need. The extra produced can go towards the accumulation of capital, (machines, more land, more tools, etc) which will allow for even more increased efficiency and production.... [tags: Politics Political Essays]
562 words (1.6 pages)
- Karl Marx and Adam Smith Karl Marx and Adam Smith wrote in the same time period – during the industrial revolution, where the bourgeois had risen to power by oppressing and exploiting the proletariat. The term bourgeois refers to the people in the class of modern capitalists, owners of the means of social production and employers of wage labor. The proletarians are the people in the class of modern wage laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live.... [tags: Papers]
1390 words (4 pages)
- Economic Theorist Many prominent economists have connected with society and made significant impacts to the economic scope of resourcing financial interest and embarking in independent productivity and innovation. Some major economic theorist includes Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and Milton Friedman. However, Alan Greenspan is one that in recent views made some impactful moves that changed the way the economy is seen and run. The changes made in earlier years, have affected higher education through today and the institutions need to review its financial framework in order to maintain its level of effective operation.... [tags: Economics, Monetary policy]
717 words (2 pages)
- The task of political economy, Marx argued, was to understand all the presumptions within productive and social relations which made social life in a given form possible at a particular time.(Peterson,17). In some nations, as Hobbes states, the lives of the poor are "nasty,brutish and short", by contrast in other nations , the poor do better within same levels of wealth. The aim of political economy is to understand the processes that produce these differences. The two historical figures that analyzed capitalism were A.Smith and K.Marx.... [tags: Economics Political Economy Capitalism]
1265 words (3.6 pages)
- Adam Smith v. Karl Marx Being reared in the typical capitalist community in the United States, it is much easier for me to relate to the thoughts of Adam Smith. This is not to say that I do not agree with some of the precepts of pure Communism, but like the old adage says, "Communism looks good on paper, but in practice, it is completely ineffective." Historically, this form of government does not tend to succeed because of many factors. Some of these include basic economic differences, individualism, and technology and how it advances or serves as a detriment to the state.... [tags: Papers Capitalism Communism Essays]
2228 words (6.4 pages)