Animal testing has been going on since the late nineteenth century. Over the years, billions of animals have been killed from experiments, but the amount of animals tested on has fallen 50% since 1968 and in 1998 reached a 40 year low of only 2.66 million procedures. With that much of a decline, I can’t imagine how many animals were once used and for what purposes.
Even with the 50% decline, the number of animals sacrificed for medical and biomedical ends in the United States each year is unknown, but certainly exceeds 60 million and may possibly be as high as 100 million. That amount of animals sacrificed each year is horrible especially when a lot of the test turn out to be inaccurate. “Of animals currently being used today, about 80% of these are rats and mice, and less than 3% are cats and dogs while non-human primates account for 2%” (internet resource). While researchers do their jobs to find alternatives, one easy way anybody can help animals is start watching what they buy and make sure they aren’t indirectly supporting the cruelty to animals.
Many corporations test on animals, but probably the largest is Proctor & Gamble. People may think they aren’t contributing to the torture of animals, but Proctor & Gamble has over a hundred everyday products that were at one time tested on. Some of their main products consist of Old Spice, Secret and Sure deodorants. “Testing cosmetics consist of placing rabbits in stocks that immobilize their heads and researchers dropping the substance into one eye, using the other as a control. The pain may be so great the rabbits break their backs trying to escape” (internet resource). In other experiments, “the animals may be force fed products or ...
... middle of paper ...
...e features. The last and most obvious alternative is humans themselves. Willingness to use alternative methods is increasing in industry, but many companies won’t be able to switch until new methods have been rubber-stamped by regulatory bodies, which still exhibits a huge conservatism. Until then, any alternative method no matter what it is should be taken in consideration.
Cruel animal testing has gone on for many years. There are too many alternatives that can test the same way an animal can. With all the medicines that were tested to work but didn’t on humans, I wonder “how many potentially useful drugs have been needlessly abandoned because animal test falsely suggested inefficacy or toxicity” (internet resource). The killing of innocent animals is not the key to finding out if a product is harmful, whenever possible an alternative method should be used.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Morality of Animal Testing in Scientific Research Animal testing is not a new thing. For many centuries scientists and testers in research have used animals of all kinds. Most of the animals are small ones like rodents - rats, mice, hamsters and gerbils. Some dogs, cats and a variety of goats, monkeys and rabbits have also been used. The animal rights issue is an emotional one. For decades the value of animal research has been grossly overrated. Although researchers claim that they depend on animal test data to achieve medical advances, we should demand other means of research and there should be laws assuring a minimum level of animal protection because testing on animals is cruel, inh... [tags: Animal Testing]
1290 words (3.7 pages)
- ... Animals are very different from humans and react differently. "All drugs that have been pulled off the market because they caused severe illness or death in human patients were previously tested on other animals."(Problems With Animal Experimentations) Certain medicines have certain effects on animals but not humans, or medicines can have no effect on animals but have a strong effect on humans. For example, morphine calms humans, excites cats, penicillin kills guinea pigs and hamsters, and cortisone causes birth defects in mice but not humans.... [tags: scientific research, opponents of animal testing]
1021 words (2.9 pages)
- “Maybe not wrong for everyone---it was clearly a complicated and individual choice---but wrong for me” (McCarthy 638). The use of animals in scientific research provokes ethical issues and casts doubt on the reliability of using animals in testing. Alternatives to animal testing are accessible and should be used instead of living animals. The personal choices dealing with animal testing proposes ethical issues that make people use their intuition. The preservation of life is choice. Poste says, “A hallmark of humanity is our ability to care about other species” (Poste).... [tags: Animal Testing, Alternatives]
1356 words (3.9 pages)
- Animal testing are experiments used on animal for scientific research. In 1981 Roger Sperry, David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel were awarded a Nobel Prize for research in brain function by studying monkeys. Roger W Sperry found out that nerves linking and both hemispheres of the brain could be tempered with, without causing any life threatening events. Many animals are very similar to humans and by studying the brains of monkeys Roger W Sperry made a huge discovery about the human brain for mankind.... [tags: scientific research, ethics]
1299 words (3.7 pages)
- Animals have been used through out medical research. The first documented case that animals were used for research was “Galen (129-199/ 217 AD),” Galen conducted animal experimentation to understand the anatomy, physiology, and pathology further. Another physician that furthered along animal testing was Ibn Zuhr (Avenzoar) who introduced animal testing as an experimental method for testing surgical procedures. This was used before testing on human patients to make sure there were fewer casualties.... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
1493 words (4.3 pages)
- Animal testing is the use of animals for scientific and medical research purposes. Animal Research is very customary nowadays, and it became a common and an accepted means of testing by the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The views of the public diverge greatly whether animal experimentation leads to medical breakthroughs or such progress is achievable by other means. The views depend on one’s own ethical and moral values and standards. Although many people believe that animal experimentation should be carried out and is justified due to several reasons, animal experimentation should be abolished because it is a very cruel and dishonest method of testing, it is unnecessary, unreliable,... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights]
732 words (2.1 pages)
- Animal Experimentation has been around for centuries. In fact, animal testing dates back to the days of Aristotle. During these times, scientists would dissect animals to test surgical procedures before using these procedures on humans, which is similar to what we do now. Today, vivisection, the use of animals for scientific purposes, helps and hinders medical research and development. Therefore, there are many pros and cons to animals testing for scientific research. So far animal testing has resulted in the increase of countless human and animal lives and life expectancies around the world.... [tags: Animal Experimentation, History, Polio, Rubella]
943 words (2.7 pages)
- Thai “Ryan” Nguyen Professor Blake Hausman Writing 121: Synthesis Essay 14th August 2014 Controversy of Animal Research For decades, using animals in research to examine the safety of products has been a controversial problem. Some people say that testing on animals has brought benefits to human welfare in many ways. Others disagree, believing testing on animals is cruel and inhumane. Both sides have their own opinions, and neither of them is wrong. By doing research on the Internet and in books, I have decided to support testing on animals.... [tags: Animal testing, Medical research, Animal rights]
1553 words (4.4 pages)
- Is animal testing considered inhumane. Should we as humans do anything to stop animal experimentation. These are only a few of the questions asked by several critics everyday of this topic. Every year in the United States, about seventy million animals are tortured and killed due to cosmetic companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and scientific centers. Poor innocent defenseless animals are mistreated badly everyday for the sake of human safety. Many people believe that animal testing is needed because it has played a vital part in medical research, but those people don’t realize that our advancements in technology have created new methods that can be used instead of anima... [tags: Animal testing, Animal rights, Skin]
903 words (2.6 pages)
- Animal research, or animal testing, is the use of animals in scientific researches to study and develop drugs for the life-taking diseases that human beings contract. It has been practiced for hundreds of years. Animal testing helps produced many vaccines and other drugs, like penicillin, and thus, save many human lives. On the other hand, animal testing also causes pain and kills a lot of animals used during the researches that many people oppose this practice. Supporters show their support, while opponents show their oppositions toward this controversial issue that is still in debates today.... [tags: Biology Medical Biomedical Animal Testing]
1403 words (4 pages)