Casimir III
Casimir III, also known as Casimir the Great, was one of Poland’s most productive kings.
His greatest accomplishments throughout his reign were the progress and the reforms within domestic Poland.
When first elected as Poland’s king, there was turmoil going on within Poland’s political aspects. They were on the brink of a war; however, Casimir knew that if Poland were to enter into a war, that they would be defeated instantaneously. Instead, with the countries that wished to wage war, Casimir helped create a peace treaty that divided up land to the opposing sides, in an effort to avoid a possible war. By saving Poland from a possibly devastating war, he was known then on as a great king, one who would truly better Poland. By doing this, Casimir showed he was to rule for Poland and for the people of Poland, to make their lives easier. This was the beginning of Casimir’s great reign.
Under his leadership, Casimir had marshes drained and forests cleared in order to promote better agriculture for his country. The people whom he ruled were grateful for his sincere interest with Poland’s economic standpoint, and that he wanted to see all of his people happy. He had roads, bridges and trading posts built while he was king to further Poland’s economy. He felt that in order for Poland to become a strong country, he had to start from the basic level and work his way up, improving things as needed. By starting with the basics, he was able to create a foundation on which to stand Poland, in case anything was to happen. He made sure that at the very least, Poland would be able to survive on its own.
What was also needed was defense against a possible attack. Casimir then proceeded to build around forty c...
... middle of paper ...
...nd.
Casimir had accomplished many outstanding achievements throughout his reign as king of Poland. It has been drawn that his title as Casimir, The Great, was a most fitting title for a king of such stature. From his help on his political standpoints and his help and assure of the well-being of domestic Poland, it is quite clear: Casimir was one of Poland’s’ finest kings, one who not only cared about his political and economical popularity, but thrived among the popularity of all of his subjects throughout Poland.
Bibliography:
1) Barnett, Clifford R. Poland; Its people, its society, its culture.
Hraf Press, New Haven, CT 1958. Pg. 182-191.
2) Davies, Norman. HEART OF EUROPE A Short History Of Poland.
Oxford University Press, Oxford, NY. 1984 pg. 293-330.
3) Halecki, O. A History of Poland.
Roy Publishers, New York. 1943. Pg. 52-61.
Niccolò Machiavelli was a man who lived during the fourteen and fifteen hundreds in Florence, Italy, and spent part of his life imprisoned after the Medici princes returned to power. He believed that he should express his feelings on how a prince should be through writing and became the author of “The Qualities of a Prince.” In his essay, he discusses many points on how a prince should act based on military matters, reputation, giving back to the people, punishment, and keeping promises. When writing his essay, he follows his points with examples to back up his beliefs. In summary, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of a Prince,” provides us with what actions and behaviors that a prince should have in order to maintain power and respect.
On the other hand there were other problems that effected the Romanov dynasty. After Russia’s removal from Poland the Tsar took it upon himself to become the new commander-in-chief, even th...
Charlemagne once said, “Right action is better than knowledge, but in order to do what is right, we must know what is right” (historymedren.com). Charlemagne proved himself to be a successful leader, and he was an inspiration to others who desired to rule Europe. He was born in 742, and very little information is known about his adolescence. Europe was trapped in its fourth century of the “dark ages” when Charlemagne was born but this quickly changed after Charlemagne became the ruler of Europe and exhibited his strong leadership skills. (livescience.com).He put a large emphasis on education and revealed that he was an inquisitive individual as he studied and spoke in many different languages. Charlemagne’s desire for success, his emphasis of culture, and his quest for knowledge ended Europe’s unproductiveness and led to great prosperity.
The quote “The ideas and beliefs of philosophers and leaders have led to changes in the nation and regions,” is a perfect example of the changes made by Peter the Great during the time he ruled. Tsar Peter I, better known as Peter the Great lived an adventurous life from the year 1672 to the year 1725. Peter the Great was an absolute ruler who reigned from 1682 to 1689. Peter the Great had many goals, beliefs, and accomplishments that he achieved during this period of time. He took control of Russia, and additionally, was able to change the way of life in Russia during the time he ruled.
The coronation of Charlemagne is now easier to understand after going through the historical evidence. It is clear that the Pope Leo is the driving force behind the coronation in order to expand papal authority and secure his own position from accusations. The overarching events of the time show that Empress Irene's decision to take the role of emperor is the key to allowing the coronation of Charlemagne to take place. Finally, through careful study of the primary sources and identifying the perspective of the writer the actual events before the coronation can be deduced despite contradictions between sources.
Ferdinand the Second was one of the most successful monarchs in establishing an absolutist rule in both political and religious areas. During his lifetime he held many titles and was a member of the House of Hapsburg. He was a strict Roman Catholic and did not have any tolerance for Protestants. Shortly after he was named ruler of Bohemia he rapidly pursued catholic reform with much success. He resolved many conflicts in Bohemia and throughout the Holy Roman Empire. Many historians believe Ferdinand II to be one of the most determined and dedicated monarch in the House of Hapsburgs.
In 771, after his bother passed away, Charlemagne became the king of the Franks, and reigned as the king until the year 814. Charlemagne became known as the “father of Europe”. Charlemagne had one of the biggest and strongest army’s. He was
Charlemagne also known as Charles the Great, created a legacy that is greatly honored still to this day. He is seen as one of the greatest conquerors ever because of territories he conquered, the diversity he created, and the building of one of the greatest empires known to mankind. Since the fall of Rome, most of the continent of Europe has not been ruled by someone, until Charlemagne came along. Charlemagne was the founder of the Holy Roman Empire and was the one person to practically lead Europe out of the Dark Ages.
Chopin’s mother played a key role in developing his love for music by introducing him to music at an early age. In addition to his mother introducing him to music, his father’s career which involved him tutoring Warsaw’s aristocratic families helped to spark Chopin’s love for music. Music was an integral part of most aristocratic families’ lives. So, it is not surprising that music had a great influence on Chopin, who was exposed to aristocratic families. The influence of Music on Chopin’s life had a lasting impact on himself and eventually the rest of
Ivan the Terrible assumed his title as Czar in 1533 and ruled until 1584. Ivan got a lot of land during his time as ruler by being a jerk in general and creating a centrally controlled government. Ivan the Terrible created a centrally controlled Russian state and a bunch of people believed that he was mentally ill. Clearly he wasn’t a very cool dude. As slightly ironic as this is, Ivan the Terrible was the grandson of Ivan the Great. His dad died when he was three and his mom, who was a regent, died when he was eight. Apparently he was a really nice kid and then got all corrupted and suspicious and a tyrant. He did however, dig music and literature.
The Prince, written by Machiavelli is concerned with the issues politics, ruling a state and how a ruler or a leader should be. The key properties of a ruler are represented by Machiavelli in details and the inner and outer effects of the success in ruling are mentioned. One of the most important topics in The Prince is about the relationship of skillfulness (virtù) of the ruler and his good or bad chance (fortune) and their effects on gaining and keeping the power. Virtù, which has the present meaning of manliness, is used by Machiavelli as having skills, strength, intelligence and prudence of a ruler. It is the inner ability to gain the power and not to lose it easily. Fortuna, with the present use, fortune is explained as the word of God and the luck and opportunity that is given to the ruler. A ruler by fortune is dependent
noble birth and he had a lot of responsibility in his kingdom. He is looked up to by most for leadership and guidance.
Alexander the Great might be by far the most impressive conqueror of the ancient world. He adopted the progression of an empire that his father Philip II started and then created a cross continental empire. Heavily influenced by his father’s success Alexander the Great adopted many of the skills, mental and military, that King Philip II had. During his thirteen years of rule he achieved more as a conqueror than any man before him was ever able to accomplish. Although his short-lived reign was great and effected many societies massively he didn’t have an heir that lived to adopt his empire from him to continue the domination of the world. This lead to him saying one of his most well known quotes “I leave it to the strongest”, which started a power struggle between his generals that lasted for years. All of these events were very significant and heavily influenced the following era.
“The Prince”, by Niccolo Machiavelli, is a series of letters written to the current ruler of Italy, Lorenzo de’ Medici. These letters are a “how-to” guide on what to do and what not to do. He uses examples to further express his views on the subject. The main purpose was to inform the reader how to effectively rule and be an acceptable Prince. Any ruler who wishes to keep absolute control of his principality must use not only wisdom and skill, but cunning and cruelness through fear rather than love. Machiavelli writes this book as his summary of all the deeds of great men.
his kingdom and gain power. While he was in Scotland, he established an effective royal