In the perfect situation, smoking policy would be set by bar or restaurant owners, and customers would patronize the establishments with the policy they prefer. Customers would decide-without the government's help-if they want to avoid smoke-filled rooms or enter them. They might even choose to sit in an area sectioned off for smokers or non-smokers, but the ultimate issue is choice (Ruwart 1). When the government starts telling restaurant owners what their customers can and cannot do, the government is overstepping its boundaries.
Our government aims to protect us-to save us from society's evils. However, in an attempt to protect the public from the effects of passive smoking (second hand smoke)-of which, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service in 1994, "the statistical evidence does not . . . support a conclusion that there are substantive health effects . . ." (Krauthammer)-the feds have failed to protect a vital part of the U.S. economic population: business owners. Many people who drink also tend to smoke; banning drinkers from smoking has hurt business in some bars and restaurants. "According to the California Licensed Beverage Association, business has dropped as much as 85 percent . . . since the prohibition took effect" (Bar Owners Vow 1). The decrease in customers and subsequent loss of revenue has far-reaching effects on employers. A study by the American Beverage Institute entitled "Effect of 1998 California Smoking Ban on Bars, Taverns, and Night Clubs" asked 300 respondents about the effects of the ban on their businesses. When asked if the ban caused owners to lay off employees or cut working hours, 29.7 percent of respondents answered ...
... middle of paper ...
...th Disruption, Lost Revenues, and Customer Dissatisfaction." Forces.org. 24 Feb. 2001. National Smokers Alliance. 26 Feb. 2001 <http://www.forces.org/californ/calud/calud4.htm>.
Bork, Robert H. "Addicted to Health." National Review 28 July 1997:28-30.
Buckley, William F., Jr. "Tobacco Settlement Time?" National Review 20 April 1998:63.
"Effect of 1998 California Smoking Ban on Bars, Taverns, and Night Clubs." abionline.org. American Beverage Institute. 8 March 2001 <http://abionline.org/ca_smoking6.html>.
Krauthammer, Charles. "The New Prohibitionism." Time 6 Oct. 1997:112.
Ruwart, Dr. "Ask Dr. Ruwart: Libertarians on Smoking Bans." self-gov.org. 19 Mar. 1998. Advocates for Self-Government. 8 Mar. 2001 <http://www.self-gov.org/ruwart/q0028.html>.
Samuelson, Robert J. "The Amazing Smoke Screen." Newsweek 30 Nov. 1998:47.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The use of tobacco products has been exposed as the reason for numerous medical complications such as cancer to non-smokers and smokers who breathe in tobacco smoke. Taking into account cigarettes adversely affect public health, putting a ban on smoking in public places is an appropriate action for governments, and other establishments presenting services to the public. Cigarettes can cause harm to the wellbeing of non-smokers unbeknownst to them, they involuntarily breath in smoke respired by smokers.... [tags: Tobacco, Nicotine, Smoking, Tobacco smoking]
1013 words (2.9 pages)
- In America, there are many cities and states that have implemented a ban on smoking indoors in public areas because of the health effects caused for non-smokers. What isn’t considered, though, is that any amount of secondhand smoke is dangerous to a non-smoker, and not banning smoking outside public places can also be dangerous to non-smokers. Secondhand smoke can cause major cardiovascular problems including heart disease and heart attacks, it also has many negative side effects on children. Smoke free bans should be implemented in all public places, including sidewalks in populated areas to protect non-smokers from secondhand smoke, because secondhand smoke causes dangerous health problems... [tags: Passive smoking, Smoking, Smoking ban]
1401 words (4 pages)
- The number of people who smoke has drastically increased over the years. A cigarette is very toxic. Cigarettes are made of arsenic, lead, tar, and those are just few of more than 7,000 chemicals in tobacco smoke. The age of individuals of who are smoking gets younger and younger as the years go by. Smoking is one of the leading killers in North America and innocent people shouldn 't die because of it. Cigarette smoking should be banned in public places because of the health risks it poses to people who are exposed to secondhand smoke.... [tags: Smoking, Tobacco, Cigarette, Passive smoking]
1313 words (3.8 pages)
- Nowadays many countries in the world have passed laws to ban smoking in public places. However, smoking in public still happens frequently. Some smokers claim that their rights are infringed if smoking is forbidden in public places. However, most non-smokers regard the ban as good news. As far as I’m concerned, smoking should be banned in all the public places such as restaurants, theaters and public square. No one will judge a smoker smokes alone in his/her personal space. However, smoke in public affect other people and the environment, it should be banned.... [tags: Smoking, Tobacco smoking, Tobacco, Nicotine]
1190 words (3.4 pages)
- Cigarette smoking has been a controversial topic for the last few decades. There are two main sides making an argument, for and against. Many people started smoking because they believed it would make them look cool, lose weight, or they were pressured into cigarette smoking by their peers. However, cigarettes can do a lot of harmful damage to the smoker or any person who comes into contact with the smoker. The people in favor of cigarette smoking believe it is good for many reasons, but those opposed to smoking believe it should be banned in public places.... [tags: Tobacco smoking, Tobacco, Smoking, Nicotine]
1071 words (3.1 pages)
- As soon as someone lights a cigarette and puts it up to their mouth they are just asking for health problems to occur. Smoking cigarettes can cause many problems that affect not only the smoker, but anyone else that is around the smoker. Nonsmokers chose to not smoke because they do not like the health risks or negative effects caused by cigarettes. People that chose to turn cigarettes down should not have to still interfere with the negative effects of tobacco because smokers are too rude to just save the smoking until they are in their own home.... [tags: Smoking, Tobacco, Lung cancer, Cigarette]
1497 words (4.3 pages)
- Smoking in Public Places Should Be Banned I feel very strongly that smoking in public places should be banned. I will list my reasons for my thinking below and explain why I think this. I cannot stand walking down a street behind someone who is smoking. Every time they exhale I then have to walk into a cloud of their smoke. My clothes smell, because they have been saturated with the smoke, it gets into my hair too. It also affects my health. It was found that seven hundred people die a year from this; passive smoking.... [tags: Papers]
476 words (1.4 pages)
- Do you mind people smoking around you in public places. According to the pro-smoking group Air Initiative 7 in 10 of you do. Do you think it is fair to discriminate against smokers, forcing them to stand outside and smoke. On the other hand is it fair that non-smokers should have to inhale second hand smoke which can dame their health. (Do you support this ban or do you oppose it?) Personally I oppose it as I believe that non-smokers shouldn’t be subjected to a smoky environment on a night out.... [tags: essays research papers]
762 words (2.2 pages)
- Smoking Should Not Be Banned in Restaurants In the perfect situation, smoking policy would be set by bar or restaurant owners, and customers would patronize the establishments with the policy they prefer. Customers would decide-without the government's help-if they want to avoid smoke-filled rooms or enter them. They might even choose to sit in an area sectioned off for smokers or non-smokers, but the ultimate issue is choice (Ruwart 1). When the government starts telling restaurant owners what their customers can and cannot do, the government is overstepping its boundaries.... [tags: Tobacco Cigarettes Smoking Argument Essays]
724 words (2.1 pages)
- Smoking is one of the leading killers in North America and innocent people shouldn't die because of it. For years people have been smoking in public thinking 'it's my body, I can do whatever I want to it,' but now that it has been proven that smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those around him or her, they should not be allowed to smoke around other people in public. Smoking in public places causes a considerable amount of harm to people and the government should be doing more to protect citizens Cigarettes are full of many harmful substances and if many people knew what they were inhaling they would probably quit immediately.... [tags: Persuasive Essays, Argumentative Essay]
822 words (2.3 pages)