Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
interpretation in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: interpretation in literature
Blake's Jerusalem and Political Correctness Blake's, Jerusalem is commonly associated with the National Anthem, Rule Britannia, and I vow to thee my country. However this association is misplaced. Although Jerusalem is often played at national sporting events for example major cricket tournaments and rugby matches as a symbol of national pride, the lyrics do not in fact totally focus on pride in England or the greatness of our country. At a glance Jerusalem gives off the impression that it is in fact aggressively nationalistic, for example, 'Walk upon England's mountains green' This line appears to be promoting England's land and therefore would be considered politically incorrect. Another strong example of how this poem appears to be politically incorrect until studied at depth is in the third and final stanza, 'I will not cease from mental fight Nor shall my (my) sword sleep in hand' This appears to be an aggressive and fierce gesture. Later in the poem further examples of this are displayed such as, 'Bring me my bow (my bow) of burning gold Bring me my arrows of desire Bring me my spears o'clouds unfold…' This may be considered an act of attack and an overly aggressive message, especially if taken literally. It also has potentially racist connotations. However when you study Jerusalem you discover it is far more politically correct then it's reputation leads you to believe. I will demonstrate this by looking closely at the meaning of the poem. For example, in the first stanza of Jerusalem; 'Walk upon England's mountains green?' The truth about England is expressed, one which is not exag... ... middle of paper ... ...on has not been achieved as expressed in the lines, 'I will not cease from mental fight Nor shall my (my) sword sleep in hand 'Til we have built Jerusalem' Other similarities are apparent in the form of the verse, with the powerful use of repetition. In Jerusalem, 'Bring me my bow (my bow) of burning gold Bring me my arrows of desire Bring me my spears o'clouds unfold Bring me my chariot of fire' And in London, 'In every cry of every Man, In every Infant's cry of fear, In every voice, in every ban, The mind-forg'd manacles I hear.' To conclude neither of these poems are nationalistic, the language and imagery used in London is one of sadness and despair. As discussed on closer examination Jerusalem is clearly expressing the sentiment that England is by no means a perfect place.
War I. The to poems that I will be comparing are ‘England to her sons’
Blake's View on Oppression of Children by Adults Blake was a poet who wrote in the Romantic period. He had idealistic views about life, and believed that the traditional country way of life was the best way to live. He despised the industry that was establishing itself in England because it was the opposite of the ideal country lifestyle that Blake idealised. The idea that Blake believed that children were oppressed is an interesting one, because, there are a number of poems which suggest different ideas about this topic.
baby then calls itself joy so that it can be happy and live a joyful
The Hate of Tyranny and Celebration of Liberty in William Blake's Poetry William Blake was born in 1757, during a period of great change in western political ideas. The poor had begun to realise that they did not have to live as serfs under the rich, and were breaking free of these old bonds, The main examples of this being The French revolution in 1792 and the American Revolution in 1775, both now considered as some of the most important events in history. Blake was a great supporter of these movements, and believed that the same should happen in England. This is why many of the Aristocracy at the time considered Blake a threat to their comfortable way of life.
Both poems would agree that patriotic propaganda is a method used to alter nation’s values and ideas. Although both poems differ in the portrayal of the patriotic message they both
William Blake, was born in 1757 and died in 1827, created the poems “The Lamb,” “The Tyger,” and Proverbs of Hell. Blake grew up in a poor environment. He studied to become an Engraver and a professional artist. His engraving took part in the Romanticism era. The Romanticism is a movement that developed during the 18th and early 19th century as a reaction against the Restoration and Enlightenment periods focuses on logic and reason. Blake’s poetry would focus on imagination. When Blake created his work, it gained very little attention. Blake’s artistic and poetic vision consists in his creations. Blake was against the Church of England because he thought the doctrines were being misused as a form of social control, it meant the people were taught to be passively obedient and accept oppression, poverty, and inequality. In Blake’s poems “The Lamb,” “The Tyger,” and Proverbs of Hell, he shows that good requires evil in order to exist through imagery animals and man.
All over the country, universities are setting up areas called “safe spaces” where potential harmful ideas are not allowed in order to protect students from ideas that may “trigger” or offend them. These occurrences are all apart of the “Political Correctness” movement that encourages people to avoid certain words and phrases that insult or marginalize minorities and the disadvantaged. Many schools, however, are fighting against this phenomenon. The Dean of the University of Chicago sent a letter to the incoming freshman class warning them that “trigger warnings” and “safe spaces” would not be tolerated at the university (Levinovitz). He was met with hostility as students “argued that the dean willfully ignored or misunderstood these intended
In "London", William Blake brings to light a city overrun by poverty and hardship. Blake discards the common, glorifying view of London and replaces it with his idea of truth. London is nothing more but a city strapped by harsh economic times where Royalty and other venues of power have allowed morality and goodness to deteriorate so that suffering and poverty are all that exist. It is with the use of three distinct metaphors; "mind-forg'd manacles", "blackning Church", and "Marriage hearse", that Blake conveys the idea of a city that suffers from physical and psychological imprisonment, social oppression, and an unraveling moral society.
Marxist views can be frequently spotted within William Blake’s works. The argument that “human interactions are economically driven and are based on a struggle for power between different social classes” is deeply rooted within the lines of Blake’s work. (Gardner, Pg. 146). In fact, “The Chimney Sweeper,” which was first published in 1789, a full half a century before Karl Marx first publicized his Marxist theory in 1848, has several instances of Marxist tones. Critic, Janet E. Gardner, argues that the theological similarities between the views expressed in the poem “Chimney Sweeper” and Karl Marx’s beliefs are easily found. For example, Karl believed that literary characters could be “divided into powerful oppressors and their powerless victims (Gardner, Pg. 145).” Similarly, Blake presents the character Tom Dacre as an accepting victim of the horrible indictment within the economically driven arrangements. An arrangement created to sell and buy children only in order to work and cripple them into a fatal labor. Both Marx and Blake note that the child labor could have come to an end earlier, but the naïve mind-set of the described characters presents them in a dream like nostalgia that even when they “awoke in the dark,” Tom “was [still] happy and warm.” Continuing, the church or government controls the mind of the children in labor; Blake echoes in an extreme sense of the children not seeing the truth or “light” and end up settling with the realities of their life. Similarly, Blake details suggest that the church brainwashes the children into believing that through tedious and cruel hours or if Tom “be a good boy, he’d have God for his father (Blake in Sweeper, L. 18-19).” Blake depicts a metaphysical defiance toward customary ...
living we enjoy in the United States is a result of the fact that we,
The poem "London" by William Blake paints a frightening, dark picture of the eighteenth century London, a picture of war, poverty and pain. Written in the historical context of the English crusade against France in 1793, William Blake cries out with vivid analogies and images against the repressive and hypocritical English society. He accuses the government, the clergy and the crown of failing their mandate to serve people. Blake confronts the reader in an apocalyptic picture with the devastating consequences of diseasing the creative capabilities of a society.
The similar rhyme schemes of the two sonnets allow for clear organization of the speaker’s ideas and support these ideas through comparison and connection. Both poems use or essentially use a Shakespearean rhyme scheme to provide rhythm for their sonnets, while adding extra emphasis to the topics presented throughout them. Owen uses the rhyme scheme in a way to stress his description of the enraged scene of the battlefield, and to further the dehumanization of the soldiers at war. The simile used to compare the soldiers to “cattle”, is connected to the fast “rattle” of the rifles, furthering the image of the inhumane way the soldiers we killed (1,3). Owen alters the Shakespearean rhyme scheme in the eleventh line making a switch to create two lines in a row that rhyme, rather than alternating. This allows for a smooth transition in his description of the ritual that marks a soldier’s death. To draw attention to the tears “in their eyes”, which could be in the eyes of the dead soldier or of their brothers at war, they are connected to the “glimmer of good-byes”, to represent the quick mourning for the soldiers (10-11). The connection here is furthered with the use of enjambment at the end of the tenth line; with no grammatical separation, the thought smoothly transitions from one line to the other. On the other hand, Keats uses the exact Shakespearean rhyme
There are two sides to a story. There are reasons why people do certain things, either to prove a point or to hurt someone. When someone says something hurtful to another individual, it is usually intentional. Within the past century our culture has changed by the way we speak to each other, and the outcomes of what can happen when we say certain things. When we are concerned about what we say about a group of people, it is called “Political Correctness.” The concept of being politically correct is generally new to the American culture. It began to show itself around the beginning of the 60’s and 70’s when more and more people began to join activist groups, fighting for certain causes (something common during pre-war eras) (Lind). So what really is political correctness, and why is it concerning? Well, again, political correctness, or “PC” for short, was and is still being defined by our current generation as we become
The theme of authority is possibly the most important theme and the most popular theme concerning William Blake’s poetry. Blake explores authority in a variety of different ways particularly through religion, education and God. Blake was profoundly concerned with the concept of social justice. He was also profoundly a religious man. His dissenting background led him to view the power structures and legalism that surrounded religious establishments with distrust. He saw these as unwarranted controls over the freedom of the individual and contrary to the nature of a God of liberty. Figures such as the school master in the ‘schoolboy’, the parents in the ‘chimney sweeper’ poems, the guardians of the poor in the ‘Holy Thursday’, Ona’s father in ‘A Little girl lost’ and the priestly representatives of organised religion in many of the poems, are for Blake the embodiment of evil restriction.
When Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election, people across the world knew that something must had gone wrong with the election give him his win. The hacking of the Democratic National Committee to release emails that “included damaging revelations about the Democratic Party and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the party's nominee” (CNN) almost certainly made an impact on the outcome of the election. However, Trump might not have needed the hack to win after all.