that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to
things that exist. It states that there must be a final uncaused-cause
of all things. This uncaused-cause is asserted to be God.
Arguments like this are thought up to recognize why we and the
The Cosmological Argument takes several forms but is basically
It is possible for those things not to exist
Whatever has the possibility of non-existence, yet exists, has been
caused to exist.
Something cannot bring itself into existence because it would have had
to exist to do that.
There cannot be an infinite number of causes to bring something into
existence, because an infinite regression of causes has no original
cause, which means there is no cause of existence.
Since the universe exists, it must have a cause, therefore there must
be an uncaused cause of all things.
This uncaused cause must be God.
Thomas Aquinas (1224-1274) had a version of the Cosmological Argument
called the Argument from Motion. He stated that things in motion could
not have brought themselves into motion but must be caused to move.
There cannot be an infinite regression of movers. Therefore, there
must be an Unmoved Mover. This Unmoved Mover is God.
Strengths of the argument
The strengths of the Cosmological Argument consist of the simplicity
and easily understandable concept that there cannot be an infinite
number of causes to an event. Some arguments for God's existence
require more thought and education in terms and concep...
... middle of paper ...
...existence of things that are necessary does not require
explanation; their non-existence is impossible. The existence of
anything contingent, however, does require explanation. They might not
have existed, and so there must be some reason that they do exist.
The only adequate explanation of the existence of the contingent
universe, the argument from contingency suggests, is that there exists
a necessary being on which its existence it rests. For the existence
of the contingent universe must rest on something, and if it rested on
some contingent being then that contingent being too would require
some explanation of its existence. The ultimate explanation of the
existence of all things, therefore, must be the existence of some
necessary being. Followers of the cosmological argument identify God
as this necessary being.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Cosmological Argument attempts to prove that God exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of causes to things that exist. It states that there must be a final uncaused-cause of all things. This uncaused-cause is asserted to be God. Arguments like this are thought up to recognize why we and the universe exist. The Cosmological Argument takes several forms but is basically represented below. Cosmological Argument Things exist It is possible for those things not to exist Whatever has the possibility of non-existence, yet exists, has been caused to exist.... [tags: The First Cause or Prime Mover]
1012 words (2.9 pages)
- The Success of the Kalam Cosmological Argument in Establishing an Existence in God The kalam cosmological argument is an argument from the existence of the world or universe- to the existence of God, I think this is effective because the existence of the universe, such arguments claim, stands in need of explanation, the only adequate explanation, the arguments suggest, is that it was created by God. This is because it says that everything that has a beginning of its existence has a cause of its existence and the universe has a beginning of it’s existence; so it must have a cause to exist, and this cause is God, therefore God exists.... [tags: Papers]
531 words (1.5 pages)
- Key Features of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The word Cosmological argument comes from the word cosmos, which refers to the world or universe as a well-organized and perfect system. The cosmological argument is a classic argument, which tries to prove the existence of God, and this argument is based on the fact that the world’s existence needs to be explained. The cosmological argument is an argument that starts from the existence of the universe, to try and prove that God exists.... [tags: Papers]
561 words (1.6 pages)
- The Various Forms of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument is a well established argument for the existence of God and it is also known as the first cause argument. The cosmological argument is based upon the belief that there is a first cause behind the existence of universe and this was God. It has taken many forms and in the past has been presented in many ways. So many philosophers have put their points across, philosophers like; Plato, Aquinas, Socrates, Hume, Kant and many more.... [tags: Papers]
1552 words (4.4 pages)
- The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological argument seeks to prove the existence of God by looking at the universe. It is an A posteriori proof based on experience and the observation of the world not logic so the outcome is probable or possible not definite. The argument is in three forms; motion, causation and being. These are also the first three ways in the five ways presented by Aquinas through which he believed the existence of God could be shown.... [tags: Philosophy Religion]
800 words (2.3 pages)
- Exploring the Possibility of Updating the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God The term cosmological comes from the Greek language, meaning ‘world’ or ‘universe.’ The argument is based on facts about the world. The topic of cosmology refers to the study of the universe. The cosmological argument begins with a general claim about the physical universe e.g. that some events have causes and that there must be a supernatural agent to somehow explain this fact. The argument seems to say that there cannot be an infinite series of causes, they have to stop somewhere.... [tags: Papers]
903 words (2.6 pages)
- The Key Ideas of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God A) The cosmological argument is to prove the existence of god. In this type of argument we are looking at cause and not design. This type of argument is an aposteriori argument because it is based upon experience. Thomas Aquinas puts the key ideas into 3 ways. First way is, motion/change. Nothing can move by itself or change itself. The first thing to have moved must have been moved by something else and that thing therefore must be God.... [tags: Papers]
1057 words (3 pages)
- The controversial topic involving the existence of God has been the pinnacle of endless discourse surrounding the concept of religion in the field of philosophy. However, two arguments proclaim themselves to be the “better” way of justifying the existence of God: The Cosmological Argument and the Mystical Argument. While both arguments attempt to enforce strict modus operandi of solidified reasoning, neither prove to be a better way of explaining the existence of God. The downfall of both these arguments rests on commitment of fallacies and lack of sufficient evidence, as a result sabotaging their validity in the field of philosophy and faith.... [tags: Existence of God]
1119 words (3.2 pages)
- Among the three arguments to prove God's existence, I find Aquinas's cosmological argument well-grounded in empirical evidence, and that the focus on simple facts proves acceptable in both historical and scientific dimensions. Aquinas starts by stating the preliminary matter that God's existence is not self-evident, and therefore we need to examine God's effects, which we are able to observe, to prove God's existence, although we are not able to understand God's nature perfectly. Aquinas provides five ways demonstrate the existence of a transcendent being through empirical evidence.... [tags: Existence of God]
836 words (2.4 pages)
- Proof For the Existence of God From the diversity of men and creatures on this earth, there has always been one unifying link. At the root of humanity’s existence, lies the root of all things natural and infinite, a hint of something supreme and purposeful, something incomprehensible; a glimpse of what is real and what is possible. Inspired by wonder one can easily be surprised by the doubts presented as to the existence and identity of this driving force. The Law of Causality properly states, “Anything which begins to exist must have been brought into existence by something distinct from itself.” Therefore, only something outside of the world could have created the world.... [tags: cosmological argument, casuality]
1352 words (3.9 pages)