Lack of Opposition to Chamberlain's Policy of Appeasement Essays

Lack of Opposition to Chamberlain's Policy of Appeasement Essays

Length: 1996 words (5.7 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Strong Essays

Open Document

Essay Preview

Discuss the reasons why, in the period 1934-38, British critics of appeasement had such a limited impact on British policy towards Germany.

The supporters of appeasement came from diverse groups, such as the Conservative Party, the Church of England and a number of right wing extreme elements. The only significant group on the centre left to support Chamberlain were pacifists. The very way in which such influential groups gave support to the policy, meant that it would be an even greater challenge for the opposition to discredit it

Few Tories favoured direct military involvement in European problems. Sir Arnold Wilson, a Tory MP, was not alone in calling for a return to a policy of isolation from European problems, supported by armaments but uncommitted to upholding collective security of taking part in any alliance system. Tories saw little other alternative to appeasement. There was strong conservative opposition to forming an Anglo-French alliance. This was because of the belief that French belligerence towards Germany was a major cause of European tension. McDonough argues that "The only other possible candidate for an alliance was the Soviet Union", but the Soviet Union was perceived in a worse light by many Tories then the Nazis themselves.

The Tory MP at the time, Sir Edward Grigg explained that "most Conservatives prefer the German system to the Russian because it is nationalistic in spirit and does not seek to unbalance...class lines." The League of Nations was far less popular in Conservative party circles then it was amidst those of Liberals and Labour party. "Tories saw European issues "through the narrow prism of British self interest and doubted whether collective security could deter military aggression." ...

... middle of paper ...

... of a driven man, full of a blinkered determination for peace such as Chamberlain, for he held such a powerful influence in parliament and government. They had to wait for the policy to prove itself foolish, or to fail if not foolish, for the chance for them to take over and implicate a stronger policy against Hitler, by this time war had already began however, and they had limited options. Perhaps if these men were in power before Munich, Hitler might have been deterred from going to war and Britain better prepared, with greater munitions and allied agreements to face the German armed forces. The tremendous unity against Nazi Germany during the Second World War owes more to the critics of appeasement, then it does to the supporters, for these men took over Chamberlains helm, where he had failed to keep peace, and bravely stood up and faced Hitler's war machine.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

The Appeasement Made By Chamberlain Essay

- “Morality is doing right, no matter what you are told, religion is doing what you are told, no matter what is right”(Mencken). What makes a person evil. What makes a society evil. Is it their looks. The way they sound. The way they think. My parents used to tell me there was a devil on one of my shoulders, and an angel on the other. I always have thought that was a ridiculous thing to think. I mean if they’re there, why can’t I see them. Every single person on this earth has made a mistake at least once....   [tags: World War II, Empire of Japan, Japan]

Strong Essays
1943 words (5.6 pages)

Chamberlain’s Policy Of Appeasement Essay

- The Policy of appeasement which Neville Chamberlain, prime minister of Britain from 1937-1939, stood by has been criticized by Churchill, prime minister of Britain 1040-1945, as we well as other historians. Appeasement refers to the act of complying to the demands of another in order to prevent war. Historians argue whether this policy was effective. There are two sides to the argument, while some historians argue that if Chamberlain had abandoned the appeasement policy and instead adopted a more aggressive policy towards Hitler’s moves the Second World War could have been averted....   [tags: army, Hitler, economic]

Strong Essays
774 words (2.2 pages)

The 's Policy Of Appeasement Essay

- Clement Attlee spoke first for the opposition, skewering the policy as an “unreal policy of unilateral appeasement…one cannot accept the word of either the ruler of Germany of the Ruler of Italy. In what must have been a line meant particularly for Neville Chamberlain, in the same speech he announced that, “in my view, the rape of Albania is to the Anglo-Italian agreement what the destruction of Czechoslovakia was to the Munich agreement.” Attlee and the Labour party viewed the invasion of Albania and Czechoslovakia as “the end of the attempt to make peace by disregarding moral issues.” Labour party rhetoric was as pointed as ever, attacking Chamberlain’s policy of appeasement and presenting...   [tags: World War II, Neville Chamberlain, Italy]

Strong Essays
1476 words (4.2 pages)

The Policy of Appeasement Essay

- This essay analyses the responsibility of Neville Chamberlain and his highly controversial Appeasement theory which hypothetically prevented the outbreak of the Second World War. The policy of Appeasement epitomised by the Munich agreement, is a pact signed in 1938 between Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Italy, which allowed Hitler to annex Czechoslovakia’s Sudetenland (area along Czech borders) to prevent the onset of a major war. Appeasement has been drastically criticised since it ended in a “humiliating failure” when Germany attacked Poland in 1939 (McDonough, 2002)....   [tags: Analysis, Neville Chamberlain]

Strong Essays
873 words (2.5 pages)

Chamberlain's Policy of Appeasement Essay

- Chamberlain's Policy of Appeasement In 1938 Neville Chamberlain came up with a policy that would hopefully prevent war. This policy was to give Germany what they wanted (to rearm, remilitarise the Rhineland and unite the Germans in Austria and the Sudetenland) in the hope that it would keep them satisfied and prevent war. There are several reasons why this was the correct policy to take. The first is that there was the memory of the Great War. People had the memories of the Great War and they never wanted anything like that to happen again....   [tags: Papers]

Free Essays
446 words (1.3 pages)

Arthur Neville Chamberlain Essay

- CHAMBERLAIN AND APPEASEMENT When studying Arthur Neville Chamberlain, it is at least as important to understand his personality, as well as his political achievement. The Prime Minister of Great Britain between 1937 and 1940, he was an intensely idealistic man, one who believed that he alone could bridge the gap between Germany and the rest of the World. His subsequent policies of appeasement towards Nazi Germany, a policy based upon pragmatism, fear of war, or moral conviction that lead to the acceptance of diplomatically imposed conditions in lieu of warfare, forever characterized Chamberlain as a most central figure at the diplomatic crossroads leading towards World War II....   [tags: essays research papers fc]

Strong Essays
2142 words (6.1 pages)

Appeasement Essay

- The 1920s had a good outlook towards peace, but near the end of the decade and throughout the 1930s signs of war were forming. Leaders arose in countries that were unsatisfied with the results of World War I. Germany, Italy, and Japan took aggressive actions, and neither the League of Nations nor the democratic countries were stopping them. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain suggested the policy of appeasement towards Hitler to keep peace. Europe moved closer to war as these actions were made....   [tags: essays research papers]

Strong Essays
919 words (2.6 pages)

Justifying Appeasement Essay

- Justifying Appeasement Appeasement was the foreign policy followed by the British and French governments in the 1930s, whereby they did not attack or confront other governments, specifically that of Germany's, when international laws were breached, but rather gave into some of the demands to keep the peace. After the horror and dramatic loss of innocent lives (amassing over 3 million) in the First World War, both the French and the British governments were keen to avoid any more blood shed and their pacifist policies meant they started to take a very lenient attitude towards breached international laws....   [tags: Papers]

Strong Essays
1186 words (3.4 pages)

Essay about The Chamberlain Case

- The Chamberlain Case "A Dingo Took My Baby!"They were the words that Lindy Chamberlain had screamed out into the blackness of the cold night in a camping ground close to Ayers Rock, Central Australia, on the night of August 17 1980, when she discovered that her nine-week-old baby, Azaria had been taken by a dingo. Lindy had returned to the family tent where she had left her sleeping 4 year old son, Reagan, and Azaria only moments before. Her husband Michael was sure that he had heard Azaria cry out....   [tags: Papers]

Strong Essays
1163 words (3.3 pages)

Appeasement Essay

- Appeasement The task of explaining why appeasement, has been continuously addressed by historians over the years. To date, there is still no single cause identified. Nonetheless there is however a general consensus amongst historians that the frightful events of world war one, distilled a sense of fear and regret amongst British society, and consequently Britain strived to prevent any future war, through whatever means necessary. In the aftermath of World War 1, lay a mutual understanding between the British government and society that never again should a catastrophe such as World War 1 occur, it was described as the "war to end all wars" reinforcing the view that it was a cataclysmic e...   [tags: History European Historical Essays]

Strong Essays
4209 words (12 pages)