Thomas More’s Utopia and Machiavelli’s The Prince both concern themselves with the
fundamental issues of how a society works and maintains itself. The goals behind the two works,
however, differ considerably. The goal of Utopia is to illustrate the maintenance of an “ideal”
society and the goal of The Prince is to instruct a prince, or ruler, on how to maintain his state.
On the surface these two goals may seem similar but the difference lies in the way the authors
handle the subject of power. As a manual, or handbook if you will, Prince treats power as a
necessity, a goal, to be worked towards and maintained, almost at all costs. Utopia, a fantasy,
treats power as something all individuals have; rather, they are empowered. By comparing the
way both works use and treat point of view and form, governmental systems and ideals the
differences in perspective on power becomes clearer.
Ideas are brought forth differently in both works through narrative point of view and
style. These two different ways reflect the views of power the authors hold. The Prince is told
in a matter of fact tone, its purpose being to inform a prince on how to run his kingdom. Inherent
in this purpose is a key to Mach’s view of power. Because it was written for the use of one man
to dominate over and control his kingdom/state, it was obviously not meant for lesser mortals. It
in itself is a tool of power which could be used for only the good of the prince who uses it.
Whether or not the people are empowered does not matter, it is irrelevant. It only matters that the
prince uses it to maintain his own power. In contrast, Utopia is a fanta...
... middle of paper ...
... word ‘virtu’ over and over again, it is made clear that his virtue is not
that of More’s.
Power is implied in the very essence of Machiavelli’s writing. It is tied in with the greed,
selfishness, and his “do anything to maintain the state” attitude. Even though Machiavelli
passionately invokes the idea of his Italy brought back to life in the Exhortation, his motives are
still selfish in nature; to look at an even broader term, his motives are nationalistic which is the
idea of a nation being egocentric. In this respect he is also contradictory to More in that More’s
ideas are for the good of human kind, not just for one nation. Ideals like justice and truth, which
are the basis for More’s invention, make it impossible for him to do anything but claim power as
the source of corruption in society while Machiavelli praises it.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Human Nature in The Prince by Machiavelli and Utopia by Thomas More It is difficult to determine Niccolo Machiavelli?s and Thomas More?s view on human?s nature. Each took a different approach to the topic. Through Utopia, Thomas More attempted to change man?s thinking by creating an ideological society. Niccolo Machiavelli, through The Prince, attempted to teach man how to deal with human nature. With this in mind, Machiavelli?s concept is much more realistic than More?s; therefore Machiavelli better represents human nature.... [tags: Papers More Machiavelli Prince Utopia Essays]
1377 words (3.9 pages)
- When people think about the ‘perfect’ society, all will have a different idea on the topic. For example, Thomas More wrote in ‘Utopia’ of a society where all of the cities were exactly the same. Whereas Niccolo Machiavelli wrote about how a society should be ruled in ‘The Prince.’ Both works paint a portrait of leadership and laws, as well as life and society. In ‘The Prince’, Machiavelli isn’t describing the aspects of a perfect society, he is speaking of how a prince should rule it in order to make it ideal.... [tags: Literary Comparison, Analytical Essay]
514 words (1.5 pages)
- Sir Thomas More”s Utopia and Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince reflect the ideals of the Renaissance. Their reflections of the Renaissance are similar while also having palpable differences. The Renaissance or “rebirth” was a cultural movement that accompanied the passage of Europe from the Middle Ages to modern times. Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian civic humanist, historian, diplomat, philosopher, politician, and writer during the Renaissance. He applied the values of the Renaissance to his political treatise, The Prince.... [tags: Renaissance, Humanism, Florence]
1537 words (4.4 pages)
- Relationship Between the Sovereign and the Subjects in More's Utopia, Machiavelli's The Discourses, and Hobbes' The Leviathan Thomas More, Niccolo Machiavelli, and Thomas Hobbes offer models for the relationship between the sovereign and the people in their works Utopia, The Discourses, and The Leviathan. Each argues that ensuring the common good of the people should be the primary goal of the sovereign. However, they differ in the specifics of their descriptions of this relationship and in their explanations of the sovereign’s motivation for valuing the prosperity of the people.... [tags: compare contrast essays]
2599 words (7.4 pages)
- Utopia is Sir Thomas More’s seminal work, depicting a fictitious island and its religious, social, and political customs. Working as an advisor to King Henry VIII, More was aware of the issues of his time such as ridiculous inflation, corruption, wars for little or no purpose, courtly ostentation, the abuse of power by the absolute monarchs, and the maltreatment of the poor. Consequently, More used Utopia to contrast some unique and refreshing political ideas with the chaotic politics of his own country.... [tags: literary criticism]
3393 words (9.7 pages)
Inequality in Machiavelli's The Prince, More's Utopia, and Las Casas' Account of the Destruction of the Indies
- What motivates one person to subject or dominate another. When people take it upon themselves to judge who has the right to be free or enslaved; who is superior or inferior; who is civilized or barbaric, the outcomes throughout history have been horrific. The actions imposed are foreign to those of us who are privileged and forever scarring to those who have been subjected. It is ironic that people have struggled so much through out time with the underlying quality that unites us as human beings: our humanity.... [tags: Comparison Compare Contrast Essays]
1565 words (4.5 pages)
- A Comparison of Societies in Machiavelli's The Prince and More's Utopia A perfect society has always been the goal for many; unfortunately it has only existed in books. The Prince by Niccoló Machiavelli, written in 1513, provides necessary information to become a Prince who will obtain, keep, and please his empire. Thomas More's Utopia, written in 1516, creates an ideal civilization that will live happily, comfortably, and without any problems. Both books attempted to solve problems within a society by critiquing other institutions and creating their own solutions.... [tags: Comparison Compare Contrast Essays]
963 words (2.8 pages)
- In Utopia Land is bountiful, foes are afar, and the economy is always seemly predictable. This fairy tale of a political philosophy and economic theory is sought after by the idealist and seen as a naive attempt the better society by the realist. This work requires an imagination, an ability to suspend disbelief for interpretation and application. More wrote this work as satire, upset with the current political conditions of Europe and and reviewing these ideals just as so; however, with more realistic applications with the time of conception and tomorrow on distant planets.... [tags: political philosphy]
2425 words (6.9 pages)
- i. Introduction Sir Thomas More was born in London to Agnes and John More a lawyer in 1477. Tomas after being a page in the Morton Household was sent to Oxford University and became a successful lawyer. After becoming an MP for the Under-Sheriff of London he started writing the book Utopia and finishing it 1516. After writing the book he was appointed as the privy councilor to King Henry VIII in 1518. He was latter executed in 1535 for refusing King Henry VIII to be the head of the church. Utopia is a fictional book about Mores talk with Raphael Nonsenso and his travels to Utopia.... [tags: essays research papers]
1546 words (4.4 pages)
- Just vs. Viable To be just is to be fair and honorable. Kids are taught that if you are kind and just you will excel and be successful. But life’s not fair and being just doesn’t necessary mean that a society will stand the test of time and be able to grow. The two different societies introduced in More’s Utopia and Machiavelli’s The Prince are very different and although More’s Utopian society would be considered more just then Machiavelli’s society. Machiavelli’s society is more realistic and more likely to be viable.... [tags: essays research papers]
1486 words (4.2 pages)