Social and Moral Attitudes of Father and Daughter in An Inspector Calls

1825 Words4 Pages

An Inspector Calls - Show how the playwright uses Sheila Birling and

Mr. Birling to reveal the disparities between social and moral attitudes

of father and daughter.

Show how the playwright uses Sheila Birling and Mr. Birling to reveal

the disparities between social and moral attitudes of father and

daughter. Explain how the director would make these disparities clear

in a stage production of the play.

There are numerous differences that are revealed between the

characters of Miss Sheila Birling and Mr. Birling during the course of

the play 'An Inspector Calls' ; Most Particularly between social and

moral attitudes.

In Act 1 Mr. Birling acts in a very self confident and smug way. He

strongly believes in a capitalist world. You can tell this from his

speech that begins;

"A man has to make his own way - has to look after himself - and his

family too, of course, when he has one - and so long as he does that

he wont come to much harm"

Mr. Birling says how he must look after himself, and then almost

forgetting his family, as though they are an after thought, or a

hindrance. Birling doesn't care how his actions affect others.

"We were paying the usual rates and if they didn't like those rates,

they could go and work somewhere else. It's a free country, I told

them"

This confirms to the audience that Mr. Birling is a harsh business

man, out to make money in any way he can. Mr. Birling is almost self

obsessed and believes that everyone has to look after themselves and

no one else. He is arrogant and doesn't seem to learn, or want to. I

believe the playwright shows him like this to make his downfall, later

on in the play, seem greater but Priestly also illustrates him like

this to show his lack ...

... middle of paper ...

... can be knocked over, only because of their wrong doings in the past.

For Mr. Birling it was 2 years before, for Sheila it was more

recently. But the same applies to both of them, they both did some

thing dreadful and didn't take responsibility and they didn't think of

what they were really doing to poor Eva Smith. This resulted in the

past catching up with them and they ended the play in a very bad

situation. Mr. Birling still keeps his moral arrogance and so ignores

the fact that he has done something bad. Whereas Sheila takes

responsibility for her actions and finds new morals. Priestly overall

message from the play is to think before you mess something up, and

take responsibility for your actions.

Priestly has made Mr. Birling's Moral arrogance obvious to the

audience by using the Inspector to get the truth out of Mr. Birling.

The Inspector reveals.

Open Document