Presidential Immunity: Cases In The Supreme Court

Presidential Immunity: Cases In The Supreme Court

Length: 1138 words (3.3 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
The Supreme Court has had to rule on issues regarding Presidential immunity in a few cases. Three specifically have helped to set the precedent for how the court would interpret another case brought before the court. In Mississippi v. Johnson the ruling decided whether a president can have an injunction placed on him/her based on the carrying out of their executive duties. Next, in the case of Nixon v. Fitzgerald the court ruled on whether a president can be personally sued for decisions they made while in office that violated established law. Lastly, in the case of Jones v. Clinton it was decided if a president could be granted immunity from a civil suit not in relation to his/her office, simply because of the importance of the presidency and the time necessary to dedicate to the job. These three cases involving Presidential immunity have shaped the way a court would interpret a case involving such if faced today.
In response to the Reconstruction Acts of 1867 the state of Mississippi brought suit against the President of the United States, Andrew Johnson, claiming that the laws were un-constitutional. The opinion of the court was given by the Chief Justice, and ruled that an injunction against the president could not be made for duties performed by the president within his duties delineated in Article II of the Constitution. In the ruling the court explained the president’s role in this specific case was not ministerial as the state of Mississippi had argued but was rather an act based on his executive and political duties. Quoting Chief Justice Marshall the court explained that an attempt by the judicial branch to oversee such duties would be “an absurd and excessive extravagance.” The opinion further explains that even though the court in this case is not being asked to tell the executive what it must do but rather telling it what it cannot do, the court must not stray from the underlying principle. Thus, the ruling in this case is that the President of the United States cannot be sued to prevent the carrying out of his/her executive responsibilities.
The case of Nixon v. Fitzgerald was brought before the court as a suit against the president for allegedly getting rid of a Federal employee for political reasons and not structural reasons as he claimed. The employee, Ernest Fitzgerald, was a civilian management analyst for the U.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Presidential Immunity: Cases In The Supreme Court." 18 Nov 2019

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Hazing Cases and Qualified Immunity Essay

- Introduction: In recent years several high profile national cases have brought hazing to the forefront in American society as a real issue and a problematic one at that. According to recent statistics from the University of Maine, 1.5 million high school students are hazed each year. Of the athletes who have reported hazing, 40% have reported that a coach or advisor was aware of the activity. 22% report that the coach was actually involved in the activities. (Allan & Madden, 2008). Moreover, 36% of students say they would not report hazing primarily because “there’s no one to tell,” and 27% feel that officials or coaches won’t handle the situation right....   [tags: humiliating, dangerous initiation rituals]

Research Papers
1745 words (5 pages)

Supreme Court Cases Essay

- It was 1803 when Chief Justice Marshall used Marbury v. Madison to constitute the “legal principle of judicial review” (Marbury v. Madison). Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to rule on an issue concerning rather another branch of government’s legislation is constitutional or not. This is a basic definition, somewhat generic if you will. What is the deeper meaning/ use of judicial review. How does it affect modern day society. These are important questions to ask when one is trying to comprehend how a federal system operates, and advances with its society....   [tags: Judicial Review, Supreme Court]

Research Papers
1014 words (2.9 pages)

Essay about Most Important Supreme Court Cases Related to Education

- (1) On May 17th, 1954, the Supreme Court made a decision that would mark a defining moment in the history of the United States. This decision declared “separate but equal” unconstitutional. It was ultimately unanimous, and occurred after a long, sought out campaign to convince all nine justices to overturn the “separate but equal” doctrine that had been sanctioned in the infamous 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case. The legal path paved in various aspects of racial discrimination in public life has been the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment....   [tags: supreme court, separate but equal]

Research Papers
975 words (2.8 pages)

Essay on Immunity to Parasites and Apoptosis

- IMMUNITY TO PARASITES AND APOPTOSIS. Humoral and cellular immunity are the two sides of immunity turn on during parasitic infections and ideally are aimed to fight infection. However, in some cases immunity to parasites can exacerbate the disease and induce tissue injury. Cellular Immunity Animal models have been most useful to better understand mechanisms of immunity to parasites. Athymic mice that lack T cells are unable to control several parasite infections. This clearly indicates that T cells play an important role during the development of these infections (39,40)....   [tags: Biology, Cellular Immunity]

Research Papers
1925 words (5.5 pages)

Supreme Court Cases Essay

- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. vs. Sawyer Also commonly referred to as The Steel Seizure Case, it was a United States Supreme Court decision that limited the power of the President of the United States to seize private property in the absence of either specifically enumerated authority under Article Two of the US Constitution or statutory authority conferred on him by Congress. The Majority decision was that the President had no power to act except in those cases expressly or implicitly authorized by the Constitution or an act of Congress....   [tags: Supreme Court Judge Court]

Research Papers
1759 words (5 pages)

Supreme Court Cases and Religion in America Essay

- There are numerous Supreme Court cases regarding the free exercise of religion. Some of the decisions made in these cases have been landmark court decisions, and they have made significant changes in the relationship between church and state. These decisions have also changed the course of religion in America. The Cantwells were Jehovah’s Witnesses living in Connecticut in the 1930s. Because Jehovah’s Witnesses believe in disseminating the word of God and convincing others to join their organization, the Cantwells would go door to door preaching their beliefs and playing recordings....   [tags: freedom of religion, Cantwells, discrimination]

Research Papers
3326 words (9.5 pages)

Essay United States Supreme Court Cases

- Historically Significant United States Supreme Court Cases There are many Supreme Court cases that have had significant impacts on our American society. They have each had a historical importance politically and constitutionally. This paper will be discussing the background, the rulings, and the significance of each case. The Supreme Court cases that will be discussed will be: Marbury v Madison, McCulloch v Maryland, Dred Scot v Sandford, Plessy v Ferguson, and Brown v Board of Education. The first case of significance was Marbury v Madison, in 1803....   [tags: Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution]

Research Papers
1152 words (3.3 pages)

Essay on Watergate-presidential Immunity

- In the early morning hours of June 17, 1972, District of Columbia police officers discovered five men, wearing surgical gloves and carrying tear gas fountain pens, walkie-talkies, and wads of new $100 bills, apparently attempting to plant electronic surveillance equipment in the offices of the Democratic National Committee in the Watergate apartment-office complex. The resulting investigation led to the discovery of the roles of several White House staff and eventually to the President himself....   [tags: President Richard Nixon]

Research Papers
785 words (2.2 pages)

Supreme Court Cases Essay

- Supreme Court Cases First Amendment- Case Facts: Students wore anti-war bands to school, which in turn got them suspended from school. The students sued the school for impeding upon their free speech. Students Arguments: 1st and 14th Amendment-free speech, they weren't hurting anyone. School Arguments: 10th Amendment-allowed the school to suspend the kids in fear of endangering other student's health and academic well being Supreme Court Decision: The students won. "Students do not shed their 1st Amendment rights at the school gates"....   [tags: Law Legal]

Free Essays
1043 words (3 pages)

Essay on Supreme Court Cases

- Supreme Court Cases Engle vs. Vitale Case: In the late 1950's the New York State Board of Regents wrote and adopted a prayer, which was supposed to be nondenominational. The board recommended that students in public schools say the prayer on a voluntary basis every morning. In New Hyde Park Long Island a parent sued the school claiming that the prayer violated the first amendment of the constitution. The school argued that the prayer was nondenominational and did not attempt to "establish or endorse" a religion and thus that it did not violate the establishment clause....   [tags: essays research papers]

Research Papers
2725 words (7.8 pages)

S. Air Force. He, under a congressional committee hearing claimed that cost overruns for the C-5A transport plane might reach as high as 2 billion dollars and that there were technical problems along with the cost. Thirteen months later he was released from his job on the premise that department reorganization had made a reduction in staff necessary, a claim which the United States Air Force upholds. The majority opinion of the court ruled that the President cannot be sued for acts within the “outer perimeter” of his official responsibility. The justification for their ruling stemmed mainly from the idea that the president’s office is “rooted in the constitutional tradition of the separation of powers and supported by our history.” They base this ruling on Article Two of the constitution which states that “the executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States.” The claim is that because of the President’s position he should be immune due to the time that could be taken up by private law suits. Furthermore, the opinion states that an inquiry into the President’s motives, like in this case, could be highly intrusive and harm national security. The dissenting opinion of the case argued that the majority’s ruling would set a pronouncement that would offer the President absolute immunity from all suits. They also argue that since only three times before this has civil suits been brought to a president that the contention that civil suits will take up a great deal of the President’s time are false. Also, the minority argues that due to this ruling that future plaintiffs will be left without a remedy and this runs contrary to what was decided in Marbury v. Madison.
The case of Clinton v. Jones brought to question whether a president could be civilly sued for actions performed outside the scope of their duties. Paula Jones, an employee of the Industrial Development Commission, was working at the registration desk where at that time Governor Clinton was giving a speech. After the speech allegedly Clinton asked a State Trooper to tell Jones that Clinton would like to see her in his hotel suite. The state trooper escorted her to Clinton’s room where he allegedly made sexual advances on her. She refused and returned to her job where she was allegedly treated unfairly and was soon transferred to a position that had little advancement potential. She thus decided to sue in the amounts of 75K for actual damages and 100K in punitive damages. A lower court ordered the trial to be postponed due to the importance and delicacy of the President’s position, however the court of appeals reversed the decision and thus Clinton appealed to the Supreme Court. The court ruled that Nixon v. Fitzgerald’s decision did not apply to this case because that decision was based on “the nature of the function performed, not the identity of the actor who performed it.” The opinion further argues that when a case like this arises if it will take up time which the president cannot afford, or if the investigation would bring forth matters which would be detrimental to government that a lower court could in fact decide to delay the trial. Furthermore, the opinion states that the Judiciary will not be interfering with the Executive’s power by ruling on this case and is thus not violating the separation of powers.
If a case were to be brought before the Supreme Court today dealing with presidential immunity then the three cases previously mentioned would help to justify the decision. If the case involved immunity for a president based on he/she performing duties explained in Article II of the Constitution then he/she would be granted immunity based on the ruling in Mississippi v. Johnson, and Nixon v. Fitzgerald. However, the precedent from both of these cases and also Jones is that the immunity is based on the functions of the presidency and not the actual position itself, thus a president can still be sued for unlawful acts. Further, a president if acting illegally within his/her duties then an impeachment trial would have to be instituted by Congress. In Clinton v. Jones it was established that the position of President does not exclude the individual from civil suits. The cases mentioned have developed the law of the land involving Presidential immunity.
Return to