Webster’s dictionary defines hindsight as “the ability to understand, after something has happened, what should have been done or what caused the event”. It is a fair assumption that most people understand the old adage “hindsight is always 20/20”; alluding to the fact that, in our everyday lives, we as humans make decisions based on what we know, what seems right and occasionally what makes our lives easier. The average person does not have the mental capability to consider every possible outcome that a choice will have on his entire life, all within the thought process that leads him to reach a conclusion, however long and detailed that process may be. If we add massive amounts of pressure, contradictory advisement, the lives of millions, failure in pervious solutions and the responsibility of protecting a nation; the fore-mentioned “average person” becomes a United States president at the time of what was arguably the most destructive war in history. I cannot, in good conscience, applaud Harry Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on two Japanese cities, vaporizing hundreds of thousands of people; however, I refuse to privately, let alone literarily, argue that Truman made an immoral or strategically flaw decision. Harry Truman did the best he could with the situation he was given. Rumors have it that even he, himself, felt remorse for the decision.
In the summer of 1945, after the end of a difficult war with Germany, President Truman and his advisors were fully focused on ending the war with Japan as quickly, and with as few American casualties as possible. The Introduction of the RTAP reading emphasizes the point that the current methods of battle with the Japanese were proving futile. Even when America did claim vic...
... middle of paper ...
...I can understand how with discoveries of new information and the development of more unanswered questions, people might be inclined to produce alternative theories about why Truman chose to use the atomic bombs. The RTAP (p.275) talks about the people who are now questioning Truman's motives, known as Revisionists because they attempt to revise common perceptions of history, proposing alternate theories and motives. I however, feel that we begin to tread on dangerous ground when we argue that major historical events should have been handled differently. Just as the person making the decision, we as chronologically distanced viewers, could not possibly assess the entirety of possible repercussions our retrospective opinions would have had on American history. As far as Harry Truman knew, dropping the atomic bombs saved the entire world from becoming evil communists.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- To what extent was Harry Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified. A. Plan of Investigation Research Question: To what extent was Harry Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified. This investigation assesses President Harry Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It will determine whether or not his decision was justified. This investigation will scrutinize the reasons that made Harry Truman feel inclined to drop atomic bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki.... [tags: Hiroshima, Nagasaki, US History, President]
1330 words (3.8 pages)
- Webster’s dictionary defines hindsight as “the ability to understand, after something has happened, what should have been done or what caused the event”. It is a fair assumption that most people understand the old adage “hindsight is always 20/20”; alluding to the fact that, in our everyday lives, we as humans make decisions based on what we know, what seems right and occasionally what makes our lives easier. The average person does not have the mental capability to consider every possible outcome that a choice will have on his entire life, all within the thought process that leads him to reach a conclusion, however long and detailed that process may be.... [tags: Alternatives, Viability, Hindsight]
1547 words (4.4 pages)
- Abraham Lincoln gave the Emancipation Proclamation in 1862, Richard Nixon chose to leave office in 1974, but perhaps one of the most iconic, and still wildly controversial presidential decisions to date is President Harry S. Truman 's decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan in 1945. This event was truly one that changed history. Tens of thousands of Japanese men, women, and children were killed instantly from the blast of the first ever nuclear weapon used in war. Still, long after the initial blow, thousands more suffered the horrific effects of radiation poisoning.... [tags: World War II]
1035 words (3 pages)
- Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Many debates have been provoked based on President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The debate is not solely based on the bomb being dropped, but more on the actual necessity and intention of the bomb being dropped. I believe that the Presidents decision was based dually on military necessity and on the Nation's reputation. Truman was not a dumb man; he was inexperienced and quickly expected to make important decisions based on very little information that he had been recently made aware of.... [tags: Papers]
489 words (1.4 pages)
- The atomic policy against Japan was closely related to the fear of Soviet expansion in Asia. U.S. leaders were strongly conscious of Russia’s agreement at Yalta to join the war against Japan three months past Germany’s surrender on May 7, 1945 (Fogelman, 124). Among the U.S. invasion of Japan planned for November 1, 1945, U.S. officials were doubtful about the cooperative mission with Russia in which Russia would have power at the peace table. However, the successful detonation at Alamogordo had transformed everything.... [tags: American History, Hiroshima and Nagasaki ]
1777 words (5.1 pages)
- Truman’s Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb on Japan During World War II: His Dilemma “America was not built on fear. America was built on courage, on imagination and an unbeatable determination to do the job at hand.” That is what President Harry Truman said only a short time after he made the audacious decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan. Many factors played a role in his decision to use atomic weapons on Japan: a difficult ground war in Okinawa, the astronomical cost of human casualties (both American and allied, as well as Japanese), the financial cost of the military action in the Japanese theatre, the desire to end the offensive in the pacific arena as quickly as possible, reduced... [tags: World War II]
1319 words (3.8 pages)
- Tolbert 1 Truman 's Decision WWII was a tragic war. Massive numbers of people were killed, soldiers and civilian. When the war began to draw to a close one of the last axis powers to remain fighting was Japan. It was said that Japan would never surrender so it was decided that in some way everything that they had to fight with would be destroyed. Although it was necessary to cut Japan off and leave them incapable of fighting, the bomb was not a necessary way of achieving this. Harry Truman’s decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima was motivated his fear of the growing Soviet Union, not the necessity of crushing the Japanese so quickly.... [tags: Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki]
3711 words (10.6 pages)
- Do you agree or disagree with President Harry Truman 's decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. President Harry Truman’s decision to use atomic bombs has been highly scrutinized and controversial. As inhumane as it sounds, I have to agree with Truman’s decision. Why Truman was sworn in as President of the United States and Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, he promised to fight for the nation’s survival and to protect the residents of the United States. If prolonged fighting had occurred (with WWII extended into 1946 and on mainland Japan), it is estimated that over a million casualties (both American and Japanese) would have occurred.... [tags: Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki]
1016 words (2.9 pages)
- The death of thousands in a moment, this was the power of the weapon the United States held in their possession. It was nearly the end of World War II. With Germany defeated and the Allied Forces ready for the cease-fire, only the Axis power of Japan stood in the way of the end of the World War. Worried about Nazi Germany’s technological advances earlier in the war, the United States began to research atomic energy and the possibility of creating an atomic bomb (Walker 10). When the bombs were created, the arguments for and against the use of it were gruesome, lengthy, and all understandable in some way.... [tags: world war, atomic bomb, hiroshima]
877 words (2.5 pages)
- President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the direct cause for the end of World War II in the Pacific. The United States felt it was necessary to drop the atomic bombs on these two cities or it would suffer more casualties. Not only could the lives of many soldiers have been taken, but possibly the lives of many innocent Americans. The United States will always try to avoid the loss of American civilians at all costs, even if that means taking lives of another countries innocent civilians.... [tags: Nuclear Weapons]
884 words (2.5 pages)