The Power of Food in Rope and Alfred Hitchcock's The Man Who Knew Too Much and Thomas C. Foster's Nice to Eat with You: Acts of Communio

894 Words2 Pages

On the first day of school, finding a spot to sit is often the biggest obstacle one can encounter. You cannot sit with just anyone. It has to be with someone we know, and if not, we ask for their permission because we are technically intruding on their meal. It might seem silly, but it is true. Food is a part of life; essential, and we cannot share a meal with just anyone. Alfred Hitchcock illustrates the intimacy that a meal brings to the plot within his films Rope and The Man Who Knew Too Much. Thomas C. Foster in “Nice to Eat with You: Acts of Communion.” claims that meals are forms of communion that function as catalysts in a storyline to expose relationships among people. He argues that a “mundane, overused, fairly boring situation” of a meal must have an additional motive for the author, because the meal by itself is simply a meal.
The logic behind Foster’s assertion that “whenever people eat or drink together, it is communion,” can be extended to support Hitchcock’s use of meals as a visual representation or a highlight for relationships and murder.
In Hitchcock’s film Rope, Brandon serves Phillip champagne in celebration of completing their goal: killing David. Phillip participates in the activity, which is often shared between those who are celebrating collectively in a mutual achievement, as if to prove that he is on the same page as Brandon. Foster would describe this as Phillip giving Brandon reassurance that says “I’m with you, I share this moment with you, [and] I feel a bond of community with you.” It may be a moment of even greater trust to Brandon, but as we know with Hitchcock, there is always more to the plot than this. Phillip’s body is in alignment with Brandon’s at this point, yet their actions are not sym...

... middle of paper ...

...or drink together, it is communion,” can be extended to further support Hitchcock’s use of meals as a substitute for marriage, sex, and murder. There is not one film of Hitchcock’s that has not had food be an issue at some point. In his films Rope and The Man Who Knew Too Much food was used to highlight relationship problems visually, as well as the occasion of murder. Through the food motif Hitchcock dramatizes a number of his most familiar preoccupations, but he does so in an extremely complex and varied manner. Hitchcock’s work overall, roast chickens tend, rather, to create problems for the characters, as in Rope and The Man Who Knew Too Much. The logic behind Foster’s assertion that “whenever people eat or drink together, it is communion,” can be extended to support Hitchcock’s use of meals as a visual representation or a highlight for relationships and murder.

Open Document