Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
movies and violence research paper
violence in movies
essy of violence in cinema & tv its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: movies and violence research paper
Reading Questions on the essay: "The Postmorbid Condition" by Vivian Sobchack
1. Sobchack’s argument pertaining to on -screen violence that she wrote thirty years ago was that any violent acts portrayed in movies back then was to emphasize the importance of an element in a story, an emphatic way of engaging the viewers and forcing them to feel what the movie was about. It gave them a sense of the substance of the plot which would allow them to feel for the characters and yearn for good to overcome evil. In other words, the effort made to engage audiences through depictions of violence created violence that was artistic and well done, or as Sobchack writes, violence was “aestheticized.” Violence was incorporated into film in a stylistic way, and even though violence in all forms is offending, twenty five years ago when it was seen in film, it had a greater impact on audiences because it had meaning (Sobchack 429).
2. According to Sobchack, contemporary screen violence greatly differs than portrayals of violence in years past. Today, violent scenes are careless and lack significance because we as audiences have become calloused and desensitized to any acts of violence. She states that there is “no grace or benediction attached to violence. Indeed, its very intensity seems diminished” (Sobchack 432). Senseless violence, gruesome acts, and profound amounts of gore are prevalent in movies today, and because even this is not enough, it must be accompanied by loud blasts and noise, constantly moving scenes to keep audiences stimulated and large quantities of violence for viewers to enjoy what they are watching. Decades ago, it was the story that was engaging to audiences and filmmaking was an art.
3. “Our increasingly techn...
... middle of paper ...
...d aspire to be like, or what one could set their own personal standards by. These were characters that the young could look up to and think, “I should be doing things like that” when the moral character helped others. Liking characters such as Tony Soprano would have been looked down on, and the person who admitted it would have been harshly judged because there is morally nothing to aspire to in this particular character.
Works Cited
Harold, James. “A Moral Never-Never Land: Identifying with Tony Soprano.” Signs of Life in
the USA: Readings on Popular Culture for Writers. Ed. Sonia Maasik and Jack Solomon. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2011. 296-304. Print.
Sobchack, Vivian. “The Postmorbid Condition.” Signs of Life in the USA: Readings on Popular
Culture for Writers. Ed. Sonia Maasik and Jack Solomon. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2011. Print.
Violent scenes and scenarios are now a common go-to for movies, books, comics, and much more.
One of America’s famous actress film director and producer Katie Aselton once said,” I don’t love horror movies with something surreal happening. That doesn’t work for me. What’s terrifying is something that could actually happen to me and what I would do. I don’t know how to throw a punch, and I’ve never had to do it.” This quote shows connection to King’s article. I’m starting to consider that everyone has a crazy side. Why We Crave Horror Movies explains the reason people want to go see horror movies. The average person enjoys the horror movies because they are in a safe environment knowing they can not be harmed. By discussing the argumentative strategies such as ethos, logos,
Life in the U.S.A.: Readings on Popular Culture for Writers. 6th ed. Eds. Sonia Maasik
This article also makes referral comparison to another genre of film “Unlike in other genres (detective, thriller), there is usually neither sympathy for the victims of Evil nor admiration for heroes opposing it.”(Kord, 2016) Violence is what triggers the guilt in the audience and what starts to make them speculate of their morality. “Violence may well be the horror film’s way of hacking away at its audience to engage with guilt. Admit who you are. Admit what you did.” (Kord, 2016) The author questions other theorists with an ample amount of valid research from validated
So, what makes people think movie violence is a bad thing? Well, a key factor is that people are concer...
From 1949 to 1996 to now, the way people see a story or movie has changed tremendously because of the change in violence. When the short story, “The Lottery” was written , the thought of this was awful, but the thought of this was different in 1996. Back in 1949, violent events are rare, but closer to the 21st century, violent things start to occur more often. When Shirley Jackson’s short story was published, people were so astonished that a human being could write that. Shortly after her short story coming out, people started to take back their prescription from the New Yorker, and they also started to send her many death threats per day. Since the time of the short story coming out, America has experienced more violence, making people in America not angry when they watch this
Does entertainment influence society's attitude towards violent behavior? In order to fully answer this question we must first understand what violence is. Violence is the use of one's powers to inflict mental or physical injury upon another; examples of this would be rape or murder. Violence in entertainment reaches the public by way of television, movies, plays, music, and novels. Through the course of this essay it will be proven that violence in entertainment is a major factor in the escalation of violence in society, once this is proven we will take all of the evidence that has been shown throughout this paper and come to a conclusion as to whether or not violence in entertainment is justified and whether or not it should be censored.
Sapolsky, Barry S., and Fred Molitor. Sex and Violence in Slasher Films. Mass Media and
As violence continues to rise the understanding behind the rise is still not exceptionally clear. It stems from the fact that violence has always been a part of our society(Noguera, 1994). While some forms of violence are frowned upon, others are glorified in the media. Violence in the media is huge entertainment for today’s society. The one fact that has become clear is that violen...
To begin, this powerful essay focuses everything on violence and how it is being used by games, movies, and even the most influential people such as the president. The author, Barbara Kingsolver central point is to let readers understand the wrongfulness of the violence being shown and done by humans especially in schools. How can the
Teens are unable to watch such content in movies because of violence and weapons and foul language. Many people believe this to be true. But the truth is that there was and is violence everywhere especially in wars. There was World War I and II, American Revolution and French Revolution. We have all already learned about these types of things in Social Studies class. Most of the denizens of Earth have already used to violence. According to the ...
In a world in which acts of heinous violence, murder or crude and shocking behavior seem to be a normal occurrence, it may lead one to wonder what has put society onto this slippery slope. How did this type of behavior come to be so acceptable and in some cases glorifiable? A careful study of society may lead to multi media as being the main cause in this changing of ideals. The modern world has become desensitized to the acts shown on television, movies, video games or printed in newspapers and magazines. Censorship must be employed if morals and decency are to be preserved.
On top of this, the way that movies and video games often depict on screen violence is strategic in numbing the audience to death. According to Dehumanization “Dehumanization is actually an extension of a less intense process of developing an "enemy image" of the opponent” (Maiese). By showing the people being killed in countless numbers as evil enemy goons with no personality or qualities, as many forms of media do, the audience does not care about their death, because they see no humanity in them.
As a hardworking college student living (without a TV) in this impenetrable Gothic galaxy, I am usually quite oblivious to popular culture. I was not even aware of the barrage of hype surrounding the release of Natural Born Killers. My attention was directed belatedly to the movie by a letter from a friend in which she lamented the present state of humanity - or lack thereof. And yet, I still stayed away from the movie for over a month despite my knowledge that it would be at the very least thought-provoking. I've learned that I have not been desensitized to images of violence, perhaps because of my earlier-mentioned insulation from pop culture. However, I was intent on listening to what Oliver Stone had to say. So last night I spent the entire 100+ minutes of the film curled in my seat, my head in my hands.
Hollywood seems to thrive on portrayals of violence. American audiences respond positively to violent, action-based films, which continue to perform particularly well at the box office. Some of these blockbusters glorify violence even further by highlighting patriotism in war films, making them both commercial and critical successes. These films let audiences admire American soldiers for killing their enemies and withstanding the savageries of warfare. In a nation that has arguably become desensitized to violence from witnessing recurring mass shootings and fatal racial tensions, it is no surprise that filmmakers Martin Scorsese and Quentin Tarantino manage to captivate