Should Bureaucracy Be Involved In Decision Making Essay

1186 Words3 Pages

If one was to look at the political administration dichotomy, in theory only elected officials should be the ones who decide the public policy, since they are decision makers, but once the policy is made by the elected officials then the policy implementations. Furthermore, administrations are the responsibility of the bureaucrat with whatever they do. In practice, the bureaucrat is involved in implementation and formulation, in which they have the expertise and the knowledge on the subject. The question then is should bureaucrats be involved in policy formulation? This is structural and difficult to draw a line between these two functions. This paper will look at whether or not Bureaucrats should be involved in policy formulations and if what is stated in theory is actually practiced in reality. It will be argued bureaucracy should be involved in policy formulation in order such policies run smoothly.
Bureaucracy are defined as a system of government which most of the important decisions are made by the state officials than be elected representatives. Bureaucracy is also an organization made up of many departments and divisions that are administrated by lots of people. They are non-elected government officials and a non-administrative …show more content…

When having a minority bureaucratic partiality, it is valuable to help minorities and it should be accepted because when helping minorities you are meeting the needs of the public. Furthermore, a passively representative bureaucracy increases in importance because of its other sources of substantive effects. This demonstrates the need to go beyond the passive-active distinction it is adequate and accurate to speak of representative bureaucratic and the sources of its substantive effects (Hong

Open Document