Policy Change and Society

1427 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The new deal economic impact

Policy change is something that has been taught briefly since most of us have been in high school. But does society really understand why policy changes and what is affecting it. Is there policy change for political gains, change of environment, social issues or are their constraints that cause our political actors to act a certain way or influence policy in a different way then expected. Throughout time we see abrupt changes in history like the social reforms President Obama has been attacking since he came into office in 2008. In addition, we have also seen bills signed by Presidents that are opposite of their party favor. Through discussing how policy change happens, the different levels and what affects policy we can start to understand why certain actions of policy happen.
A policy change that is widely known in our history is the New Deal in acted by President Roosevelt in the 1930s. In the New Deal policy, it was a response to the Great Depression. This policy create relief, reform and recovery for the lower class and unemployed people of American. In this case politicians had to make a policy change for the social welfare and economic life of America. It provided relief for cities, made fair competition between industries throughout the National Industrial Recovery Act. Furthermore as the New Deal was created policy changed happened later in the 1930s to support the changing environment. For example, the Social Security act was created to help support the elderly population of the nation, this helped to provided social welfare and insurance funded through out payroll taxes. We also change in social welfare with the setting of maximum hours that can be worked within a work week. These changes were all made to enhance the...

... middle of paper ...

...overnment spending. The people who are in Part D of Medicare are there for a reason, low income. The fact that they are promised to be covered, but then have to seek out other supplemental insurance or pay thousands on out of pocket cost because they end up getting placed in different plan is not efficient. In my opinion this political move and policy change was not in President Bush’s best interest for his political image unlike President Clinton.
Many things can effect policy change positively and negatively. The motive that drives can be social and economic relief, political gain or there can be lack of policy change due to the constraint of past decisions.

Works Cited

Béland, Daniel, and Alex Waddan. "1-3." The Politics of Policy Change: Welfare, Medicare, and Social Security Reform in the United States. Washington, DC: Georgetown UP, 2012. N. pag. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Public Policy Analysis: Gun Control

    1245 Words  | 3 Pages

    Public policies are developed in response to the existence of a perceived problem or an opportunity. The analysis delves into a public issue or problem and assesses a set of proposed government action for addressing the issue. The job of the analyst is to describe the background and status of an issue and then, using research and analysis, determine a proper government action to resolve the issue. By comparing options and weighing their expected benefits, the analyst should conclude with a recommended course of action or inaction to addressing the issue.

    Read More

  • The Pros of Welfare Reform

    364 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the summer of 1996, Congress finally passed and the President signed the "Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996", transforming the nation's welfare system. The passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act sets the stage for ongoing reconstruction of welfare systems on a state-by-state basis. The combined programs will increase from nearly $100 billion this year to $130 billion per year in 6 years. Programs included are for food stamps, SSI, child nutrition, foster care, the bloss grant program for child- care, and the new block grant to take the place of AFDC. All of those programs will seek $700 billion over the next 6 years, from the taxpayers of America. This program in its reformed mode will cost $55 billion less than it was assumed to cost if there were no changes and the entitlements were left alone. The current welfare system has failed the very families it was intended to serve. If the present welfare system was working so well we would not be here today.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Great Depression And The New Deal

    1257 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Great Depression of 1929 to 1940 began and centered in the United States, but spread quickly throughout the industrial world. The economic catastrophe and its impact defied the description of the grim words that described the Great Depression. This was a severe blow to the United States economy. President Roosevelt’s New Deal is what helped reshape the economy and even the structure of the United States. The programs that the New Deal had helped employ and gave financial security to several Americans. The New Deals programs would prove to be effective and beneficial to the American society.

    Read More

  • The New Deal Dbq

    766 Words  | 2 Pages

    The New Deal was a set of acts that effectively gave Americans a new sense of hope after the Great Depression. The New Deal advocated for women’s rights, worked towards ending discrimination in the workplace, offered various jobs to African Americans, and employed millions through new relief programs. Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR), made it his duty to ensure that something was being done. This helped restore the public's confidence and showed that relief was possible. The New Deal helped serve American’s interest, specifically helping women, african american, and the unemployed and proved to them that something was being done to help them.

    Read More

  • The New Deal And Reagan

    784 Words  | 2 Pages

    The New Deal provided motivation for governmental action for fifty years. The material conditions of the nation could be cast into the frame of the New Deal and would motivate public action to address them. The way that they were addressed was framed by the New Deal's notion that the dispossessed of society were dispossessed because of the irresponsible actions of those at the top of the American economy. Government would become their representative in addressing the failures of capitalist leadership to protect the common man and woman. Franklin D. Roosevelt instituted the New Deal, which consisted of the Workers Progress Administration, and Social Security among several other programs.

    Read More

  • The Agenda Setting which Led to the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act

    980 Words  | 2 Pages

    Agenda setting is the process that determines appropriate solutions to a certain problem of a given field (Kingdon, 3). The process itself consists of three streams: problems, policies, and politics (Kingdon, 16). These separate streams interact when windows of opportunity are open – solutions are fitted with problems, and the impetus for this relationship is amenable political forces (Kingdon, 20). Prominent agendas are determined by the problem or political streams, while solutions are crafted in in the policy stream (Kingdon, 20). In the field of health care, the agenda setting is based upon the high number of uninsured citizens, the rising cost of medical care, the development of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in response to this issue, and the key players that debate whether governmental involvement is the correct approach in the issue of universal healthcare.

    Read More

  • The New Deal Legacy Essay

    1316 Words  | 3 Pages

    It would be erroneous to assume that Roosevelt’s New Deal policies did not change America—they did. Although most of the New Deal programs no longer exist today, there were some policies that were integral to the advancement of American society. The most notable of these was the Social Security Act of 1935. Social security helped expand the governmental role of the president and was the blueprint for future welfare programs.

    Read More

  • Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996

    2980 Words  | 6 Pages

    Jeff Grogger, Lynn A. Karoly, Jeff Grogger. Welfare Reform: Effects of a Decade of Change. New York: Harvard University Press, 2005.

    Read More

  • The United States: The Reluctant Welfare State

    2138 Words  | 5 Pages

    Blau, J. (2004). The dynamics of social welfare policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.

    Read More

  • The History of Welfare in America

    2743 Words  | 6 Pages

    Welfare has been a safety net for many Americans, when the alternative for them is going without food and shelter. Over the years, the government has provided income for the unemployed, food assistance for the hungry, and health care for the poor. The federal government in the nineteenth century started to provide minimal benefits for the poor. During the twentieth century the United States federal government established a more substantial welfare system to help Americans when they most needed it. In 1996, welfare reform occurred under President Bill Clinton and it significantly changed the structure of welfare. Social Security has gone through significant change from FDR’s signing of the program into law to President George W. Bush’s proposal of privatized accounts.

    Read More

  • New Deal Dbq

    1545 Words  | 4 Pages

    The New Deal sought to create a more progressive country through government growth, but resulted in a huge divide between liberals and conservatives. Prior to the New Deal, conservatives had already begun losing power within the government, allowing the Democratic Party to gain control and favoring by the American people (Postwar 284). With the Great Depression, came social tensions, economic instability, and many other issues that had to be solved for America’s wellbeing. The New Deal created a strong central government, providing the American people aid, interfering with businesses and the economy, allowing the federal government to handle issues they were never entrusted with before.

    Read More

  • FDR DBQ

    1167 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Great Depression was one of the greatest challenges that the United States faced during the twentieth century. It sidelined not only the economy of America, but also that of the entire world. The Depression was unlike anything that had been seen before. It was more prolonged and influential than any economic downturn in the history of the United States. The Depression struck fear in the government and the American people because it was so different. Calvin Coolidge even said, "In other periods of depression, it has always been possible to see some things which were solid and upon which you could base hope, but as I look about, I now see nothing to give ground to hope—nothing of man." People were scared and did not know what to do to address the looming economic crash. As a result of the Depression’s seriousness and severity, it took unconventional methods to fix the economy and get it going again. Franklin D. Roosevelt and his administration had to think outside the box to fix the economy. The administration changed the role of the government in the lives of the people, the economy, and the world. As a result of the abnormal nature of the Depression, the FDR administration had to experiment with different programs and approaches to the issue, as stated by William Lloyd Garrison when he describes the new deal as both assisting and slowing the recovery. Some of the programs, such as the FDIC and works programs, were successful; however, others like the NIRA did little to address the economic issue. Additionally, the FDR administration also created a role for the federal government in the everyday lives of the American people by providing jobs through the works program and establishing the precedent of Social Security...

    Read More

  • Two Methodologies of Charles Lindblom in the Science of Muddling Though

    607 Words  | 2 Pages

    Charles Lindblom in the Science of Muddling Though identified two methodology in formulating policy - the Rational Comprehensive (Root) and Successive Limited Comparisons (Branch). There are numerous differences between the root and branch decision-making methods for policymaking; root (rational) decision-making starts from basic issues on every occasion and builds from the ground up, whereas branch (successive limited comparison) begins with the current situation and changes incrementally. The linear or rational model presents policy-making as a problem solving process which is sensible, objective and analytical. In the model, decisions are made in an orderly manner starting with the identification of a problem or issue then ending with a set of activities to solve or deal with it. Charles Lindblom is critical of the Rational Comprehensive Method (Root) of policy process as simplistic and difficult to apply when dealing with complex issues (Lindblom, 1959, p. 79). He advocates that there is logic of “muddling through” the process rather than identifying all the issues, collecting al...

    Read More

  • The Process Of Creating And Implementing Policy

    814 Words  | 2 Pages

    Policy in my perspective illustrates as a decision making, planning and or action taken to achieve a certain specific goal within our society. According to Longest B. (2010), his definition stated in his text book states that a policy is defined as ” authoritative decisions made in the legislative, executive, or judicial branches of government that are intended to direct or influence the actions, behaviors, or decisions of others.” In developing a policy, certain steps need to be taken in act to implement the policy. The crucial steps in implementing a policy are: recognizing the problem, agenda setting, formulating the policy, and finally implementing the policy (N.A., 2015).

    Read More

  • Policy Analysis that Relates to Crime

    1346 Words  | 3 Pages

    The policy process is a long process that involves many steps and participants from the federal government, state government and local governments. All three levels of government deal with issues related to crime. Once the issues have been addressed and the policy has been created the policy then governs the criminal justice system. Some of the roles of the federal and state governments are similar and others differ yet they all share a common goal, to better the criminal justice system.

    Read More

More about Policy Change and Society

Open Document