The Court and Sir Thomas Wyatt

1398 Words3 Pages

The Court and Sir Thomas Wyatt

During the 16th Century, English poetry was dominated and institutionalised by the Court. Because it 'excited an intensity that indicates a rare concentration of power and cultural dominance,' the Court was primarily responsible for the popularity of the poets who emerged from it. Sir Thomas Wyatt, one of a multitude of the so-called 'Court poets' of this time period, not only changed the way his society saw poetry through his adaptations of the Petrarchan Sonnet, but also obscurely attempted to recreate the culture norm through his influence. Though much of his poems are merely translations of Petrarch's, these, in addition to his other poetry, are satirical by at least a cultural approach.

Thomas Wyatt was born at Allington Castle in Kent, in 1503 and had made his first Court appearance by the age of thirteen as a Sewer Extraordinary to King Henry VIII. By 1525 he served the King in several various duties. Wyatt was rumoured to have been a lover of Anne Boleyn, wife to King Henry VIII, and possibly imprisoned for the affair. He witnessed her execution on May 19, 1536.

Another important thing to realise while studying Wyatt, in so far as poetry analysis is concerned, is the time period in which he wrote. Although the exact date for the beginning of the Renaissance is unknown, Wyatt was surely part of that movement. The term Renaissance denotes a transition between the medieval and modern world which individualised the sixteenth century and helped to enlarge the mind of man 'with a sense of old freedoms regained and of new regions to be explored.' Wyatt and one of his contemporaries, Henry Howard Earl of Surrey, pioneered a literary movement in which 'their task was, not to carry o...

... middle of paper ...

...erge.

All of the satire found in Wyatt's poetry addresses the one seemingly overwhelming problem of the Court's influence and restraint on an individual's morals and emotions. According to Stephen Greenblatt in an essay on culture, the more severe punishments which are used against those who do not behave in a socially acceptable way, such as imprisonment (in Wyatt's case), are not nearly as effective as 'seemingly innocuous responses: a condescending smile, laughter poised between the genial and the sarcastic, a small dose of indulgent pity laced with contempt, cool silence.' In literary works, Greenblatt connects these responses with the effect that blame has in enforcing cultural boundaries through the use of satire; as I have shown, Wyatt uses poetry, although obscurely because of the jeopardy it imposed on his freedom, as his own method of social control.

Open Document