Democracy And Deliberative Democracy

1024 Words3 Pages

Democracy is defined as ‘A system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state’ (Oxforddictionaries.com, 2015). However, there are varying interpretations on how this is achieved. This essay will analyse pluralist democracy, deliberative democracy, and the delegate view of representational democracy. These theories are the most democratic systems of government as they allow the most amount of citizens to have an influence in policy making. However, the system which allows for the highest quality of democracy and is more democratic is the pluralist system, as it is the most legitimate.

The pluralist theory of democracy is one credible theory of a democratic system as it allows a plethora of interest groups to …show more content…

Deliberative theory proposes that local decision-making should be made by discussion groups formed of a mixture of economic, racial, and educational backgrounds, of all genders, who perceive themselves as equals. This enhances the quality of democracy as the decisions made are more legitimate in the eyes of the people, as the public have been involved in decision making. Deliberative democracy not only increases the number of the public involved in decision making but also leads to an improved quality of decisions. This is because the process of deliberation suggests contemplation, and allows for more well informed views to come forward, even situations where members are willing to amend their views in light of the dialogue (Dryzek and Dunleavy, 2009: 216). Furthermore, deliberation could, over time, lead to better solutions to conflict within societies, as citizens will come to accept the most reasonable and effective decisions, however, this does not mean that it needs to ‘result in unanimity or consensus’ (Sunstein, cited in Johnson 1998: 162). Despite this, there are some problems with this system as it is based in some assumptions which are too unrealistic. Firstly, the circumstances for debates to take place are near impossible to create. It is unlikely that a space free of coercion, or inequalities can exist in the current socio-economic system. Secondly, deliberative democracy suggests that participants are likely to change their views as a result of the debate, however, this is an unreasonable assumption (Johnson 1998: 174), as humans are naturally self-interested and likely to protect their beliefs and ideas. Whilst deliberative democracy does provide a convincing argument in theory, it is unlikely to succeed in practice due to the idealism it is founded

Open Document