To start things off we should discuss what the control principle is. "The control principle states: We should morally assess an agent on the basis of a factor, F, only if F is under the agent’s control". Basically we should only morally judge actions only on factors that the agent has control over. An example of this would be if we had two drivers on the road heading home. Assume that both of them are following all the rules and regulations of the road. All the sudden, a dog runs out in front of one of the drivers resulting in the dog dying. If you were to follow the control principle then both drivers would be morally assessed the same. The dog being killed was an uncontrollable factor to the agent. We should not morally judge him more harshly than the other driver because an uncontrollable misfortunate event took place.
The problem with the control principle is that if you follow it exactly then you really can’t hold anyone morally responsible for their actions. A lot of factors go into decisions and actions. It would be next to impossible to decipher every little detail of whether it was within the agents control or not. So, if following this principle, you would pretty much be saying no one is morall...
... middle of paper ...
...at all the parts you’ll see this was not his true intention. Jones was told that if he didn’t kill Smith then his entire family would be killed. Well clearly Jones is going to want to save his family. Now even though Jones has respect for Smith, he can’t place that above his family.
The actual conclusion to this given situation is that Jones had good intentions. He intended to save his family. Trying to save your entire family from being murdered by a hit man seems to be a pretty good intention in any rational human beings eyes. The fact that Smith and Jones be put in that situation may be a matter of luck, maybe even the act of shooting Smith was. This is irrelevant though when you’re looking to where the individual’s true intentions lie. Basically, luck plays its part on situations but it's more of where your intention lies in the grand scheme of things.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- PHIL 205: PAPER Thomas Nagel 's notion of moral luck poses an ethical dilemma concerning our human capacities to act morally. If we don’t have complete control over our actions, how can we be morally judged. This challenges a number of philosophers that have considered the ways in which we can universally detect when an act is morally right and when is an act morally wrong. Is there truly a unique and single way in which we can determinate what is moral, or are we purposefully ignoring mediating factors for the sake of justice.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Immanuel Kant, Aesthetics]
1082 words (3.1 pages)
- In the article Moral Luck, Thomas Nagel is defending his definition of moral luck and opposing Kant’s view of moral luck. Kant believes that moral luck is the good will and to do our duty by the reasons for our actions. Nagel believes that this theory is too simple. Nagel’s view of moral luck is when outside factors that are out of our control are considered to be reasons for moral judgements whether the actions are good or bad. Good and bad luck should not influence our moral judgement of a person and their actions.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Luck, Judgment]
721 words (2.1 pages)
- Choices: we all make them daily. Every decision that we make and every action we take has a consequence. At times, our expected consequences and the actual outcome of our decision can differ, from minimal to the extreme. Thomas Nagel wrote on the moral aspects of assigning blame or praise on the actions or consequence of an agent, even if the agent was not in full control over the action or consequence. This theory is known as moral luck. Nagel attempts to assign luck into some objects in determining the outcomes of actions.... [tags: Luck, Morality, English-language films, Risk]
735 words (2.1 pages)
- The Outcome of Outcome Based Luck According to Thomas Nagel’s revolutionary, yet problematic theory, a person can never truly be responsible for anything. The philosopher theorizes that there is a force outside our own self-control that can influence our ethical standings. These forces are referred to as moral luck. In Nagel’s eyes, there are four different types of moral luck: constitutive luck, luck in one’s circumstances, luck in how one is determined by antecedent circumstances and luck in the way things turn out.... [tags: Thomas Nagel's theory]
1246 words (3.6 pages)
- The great Philosophers: Kant, Mill & Aristotle Kierra Jones Dr. Lovern Valdosta State University Both Kant and Mill were significantly influenced by David Hume 's purported "IS-OUGHT" misrepresentation of good misreasoning. Hume 's explanation of the paradox is a sensible feedback of most persons ' thoughts regarding morals. Individuals make a progression of factual or "is" proclamations and after that reason that individuals ought to do something about such realities or ought not to do something in light of such certainties.... [tags: Ethics, Immanuel Kant, Morality, Philosophy]
1311 words (3.7 pages)
- Nagel is a profound philosopher, who defends a customary view of science a way to gain knowledge of the world. In the argument, Nagel makes it clear that there is good reason to believe that God doesn’t exist, however, he does make it clear that his views make fall along the lines of Buddhism. Nagel claims that he his questioning the theological proposition to believe in God. Nagel has given two points in proving that God does not exist. The first point goes along the lines that of that God exist, however, they don’t have a good reason to believe in God but they also have no good reason to not believe in God.... [tags: Existence, Ontology, God, Problem of evil]
1227 words (3.5 pages)
- Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher during the Enlightenment, a time when dramatic changes were taking place in philosophy, the sciences, and politics. He was born on April 22, 1724 in Konigsberg, Prussia, a town that he would never leave. His father was a saddle maker, and his mother was known for her character and natural intelligence. Kant’s family lived modestly, and was active in the Pietism branch of the Lutheran Church. Kant’s pastor made it possible for him to receive an education, by admitting him to the Pietism School at the age of eight.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Morality, Human, Philosophy]
1260 words (3.6 pages)
- The philosophers Williams and Nagel have recognized a problem wherein moral assessment is based on forces outside human agency: called the problem of moral luck. As I find both philosopher’s solutions unsatisfactory, I will propose a superior settlement to the problem of moral luck by defining what is meant by moral luck, as well as by analyzing William’s control principle alongside Nagel’s ‘solution’. I argue that there must be acceptance of luck as a force of the universe, with individual’s moral accountability being determined on the risks that they take, and their understanding of the dangers of these risks.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Human, Luck]
1294 words (3.7 pages)
- Critique on Thomas Nagel's What it is like to be a bat. The 'mind-body' problem has troubled philosophers for centuries. This is because no human being has been able to sufficiently explain how the mind actually works and how this mind relates to the body - most importantly to the brain. If this were not true then there would not be such heated debates on the subject. No one objects to the notion that the Earth revolves around the sun because it is empirical fact. However, there is no current explanation on the mind that can be accepted as fact.... [tags: Papers Nagel To Be Bat Essays Papers]
1757 words (5 pages)
- Philosopher’s Essay Thomas Hobbes- Thomas Hobbes was born on April 5, 1588 and died on December 4, 1679. He was born in Malmesburg, Wiltshire, England, but spent some time living in Paris. Hobbes’ idea of a social contract was absolute power; a single ruler would take control and keep society together. Leviathan was the book Hobbes wrote that reflected social contract. “No arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death: and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.” This quote from Thomas Hobbes is saying that if we didn’t have any of these things the world would chaos.... [tags: Philosophers]
840 words (2.4 pages)