To start things off we should discuss what the control principle is. "The control principle states: We should morally assess an agent on the basis of a factor, F, only if F is under the agent’s control". Basically we should only morally judge actions only on factors that the agent has control over. An example of this would be if we had two drivers on the road heading home. Assume that both of them are following all the rules and regulations of the road. All the sudden, a dog runs out in front of one of the drivers resulting in the dog dying. If you were to follow the control principle then both drivers would be morally assessed the same. The dog being killed was an uncontrollable factor to the agent. We should not morally judge him more harshly than the other driver because an uncontrollable misfortunate event took place.
The problem with the control principle is that if you follow it exactly then you really can’t hold anyone morally responsible for their actions. A lot of factors go into decisions and actions. It would be next to impossible to decipher every little detail of whether it was within the agents control or not. So, if following this principle, you would pretty much be saying no one is morall...
... middle of paper ...
...at all the parts you’ll see this was not his true intention. Jones was told that if he didn’t kill Smith then his entire family would be killed. Well clearly Jones is going to want to save his family. Now even though Jones has respect for Smith, he can’t place that above his family.
The actual conclusion to this given situation is that Jones had good intentions. He intended to save his family. Trying to save your entire family from being murdered by a hit man seems to be a pretty good intention in any rational human beings eyes. The fact that Smith and Jones be put in that situation may be a matter of luck, maybe even the act of shooting Smith was. This is irrelevant though when you’re looking to where the individual’s true intentions lie. Basically, luck plays its part on situations but it's more of where your intention lies in the grand scheme of things.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Outcome of Outcome Based Luck According to Thomas Nagel’s revolutionary, yet problematic theory, a person can never truly be responsible for anything. The philosopher theorizes that there is a force outside our own self-control that can influence our ethical standings. These forces are referred to as moral luck. In Nagel’s eyes, there are four different types of moral luck: constitutive luck, luck in one’s circumstances, luck in how one is determined by antecedent circumstances and luck in the way things turn out.... [tags: Thomas Nagel's theory]
1246 words (3.6 pages)
- In “War and Massacre” by Thomas Nagel, Nagel argues that there are limits on what can be done to an enemy even its for the sake of overall good. He believes that such an idea is grounded on the principles of Absolutism, where morality is determined by the action itself (deontology). This is contrary to the view of Utilitarianism, which relies on the premise that Morality is determined by its consequences (Consequentialism). Although could one in fact generate such a moral structure around war. Do the ends justify the means in War.... [tags: Literary Analysis, Nagel]
881 words (2.5 pages)
- To be good is good but it has to be done for the right reason. Aristotle and Kant are two famous philosophers who have different ethical theories. The theory’s of virtue and duties rest not only on laws and obligations but from what comes from the inside. Morality comes from inner strength, character and how we live our life to the best end. Aristole 384-322 b.c.e. Aristotle conceptualized the branches of philosophy and contributed to the theories in logic, metaphysics, ethics and political philosophy (book 237).... [tags: Philosophy, Philosophers]
1297 words (3.7 pages)
- Critique on Thomas Nagel's What it is like to be a bat. The 'mind-body' problem has troubled philosophers for centuries. This is because no human being has been able to sufficiently explain how the mind actually works and how this mind relates to the body - most importantly to the brain. If this were not true then there would not be such heated debates on the subject. No one objects to the notion that the Earth revolves around the sun because it is empirical fact. However, there is no current explanation on the mind that can be accepted as fact.... [tags: Papers Nagel To Be Bat Essays Papers]
1757 words (5 pages)
- Kant as a Philosopher How does one label Kant as a philosopher. Is he a rationalist or an empiricist. Kant makes a distinction between appearances and things in themselves. He also says that things in themselves exist, and that we have no knowledge of things in themselves. This could be labeled "CLOSE TO NONSENSE", but we know Kant better than that. No matter how many laps on the track of metaphysics Kant takes us through, he is still widely held as one of the greatest modern philosophers of our time.... [tags: Papers]
1257 words (3.6 pages)
- Philosopher’s Essay Thomas Hobbes- Thomas Hobbes was born on April 5, 1588 and died on December 4, 1679. He was born in Malmesburg, Wiltshire, England, but spent some time living in Paris. Hobbes’ idea of a social contract was absolute power; a single ruler would take control and keep society together. Leviathan was the book Hobbes wrote that reflected social contract. “No arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death: and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short.” This quote from Thomas Hobbes is saying that if we didn’t have any of these things the world would chaos.... [tags: Philosophers]
840 words (2.4 pages)
- Immanuel Kant's The Grounding For The Metaphysics of Morals and John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who addressed the issues of morality in terms of how moral traditions are formed. Immanuel Kant has presented one viewpoint in "The Grounding For The Metaphysics of Morals" that is founded on his belief that the worth of man is inherent in his ability to reason. John Stuart Mill holds another opinion as presented in the book, "Utilitarianism" that is seemingly in contention with the thoughts of Kant.... [tags: Kant Mill Philosophy Philosophers Essays]
2744 words (7.8 pages)
- Gewirth and Nagel One difference between Alan Gewirth’s defense of absolutism and that offered by Thomas Nagel is that Nagel concedes that it can be wrong to fail to violate absolute prohibitions (or absolute rights) in order to prevent catastrophic consequences whereas Gewirth does not. Explain what you regard as the most important advantages and disadvantages of each author’s position. Which one has the more compelling defense of absolutism. Rights delineate a space around individuals that must be respected.... [tags: Alan Gewirth Thomas Nagel Rights Essays]
2274 words (6.5 pages)
- He was the fourth of nine children of Johann Georg and Anna Regina Kant, German philosopher Immanuel Kant was born in Konigsberg, East Prussia in 1724. Son of a humble saddler, his family belonged to a Protestant religious group of Pietists ,religion was a very improtant part in every aspect of their lives. Even though Kant was critical of formal religion, he still admired the conduct of Pietists. Kant’s went to elementary school at Saint George’s Hospital School and then went to the Collegium Fredericianum, a Pietist school, where he studied from 1732 until 1740.... [tags: Immanuel Kant]
711 words (2 pages)
- Ruthlessness in Public Life by Thomas Nagel The issues discussed by Thomas Nagel in 'Ruthlessness in Public Life' are that continuities and discontinuities exist between the public and private morality. Public officials need to recognize that there are clear limitations on actions which conflict with morality concerns. Nagel explored how public and private sectors need to adhere to certain ordinary moral standards. To rectify these issues of construed morality, Nagel explores a few options. Nagel states that 'If one of them takes on a public role, he/she accepts certain obligations, certain restrictions, and certain limitations on what he/she accepts' This statement incurs that public offi... [tags: Ruthlessness Life Thomas Nagel Essays]
458 words (1.3 pages)