Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
short note on risk assessment
short note on risk assessment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: short note on risk assessment
Introduction This paper discusses three risk analysis methodologies, specifically, MSRAM, OCTAVE, and CRAMM and provides a detailed description of each and how they incorporate risk into a platform for decision makers to use in their endeavors to prevent, protect, mitigate, respond, and in recovery measures as part of the risk assessment and management processes. MSRAM The MSRAM method was established through the U.S. Coast Guard to deliver a uniform and all-inclusive approach for gauging risks and allocating resources throughout all areas of responsibility of the U.S. Coast Guard. It replaced the Port Security Risk Tool and offers a comprehensive, risk-based approach to assessing the nation’s port’s and waterways (Edmonson 2006, 18). MSRAM defines risks as the product of “Threat, Vulnerability and Consequence, R = TVC” (Edmonson 2006, 18). It includes software-guided input tools for estimating each element of risk: T, V and C. Although the Coast Guard reports their risk using a Risk Index Number (RIN), that number can be directly associated with a dollar cost of consequences. The MSRAM method uses a computer program single tool, a lone set of definitions and a team of trained risk analysts. Furthermore, all data from their analyses are rolled up to a single national database and checked for consistency and reasonableness at four levels of review: 1) the Captain of the Port, 2) the District, 3) Areas, 4) and Headquarters. Additionally, historical data for consequences, for a range of asset classes, are used to create reasonable ranges for user input. This level of quality control is unprecedented in a risk tool and offers a best practice for other risk analysts. At the moment, MSRAM is the only instrument used on a nationwid... ... middle of paper ... ...ion process. Conclusion While there are many forms and methods to assess risk, the above approaches provide alternative options to the decision makers that may or may not be specific to their needs. References Edmonson, R. G. 2006. "PSRAT to MSRAM." Journal Of Commerce (15307557) 7, no. 44: 18. Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed December 18, 2013). Kouns, Jake and Daniel Minoli. 2010. Information Technology Risk Management in Enterprise Environments: A Review of Industry Practices and a Practical Guide to Risk Management Teams. John Wiley & Sons. (Kouns and Minoli 2010) Blokdijk, Gerard and Ivanka Menken. 2008. Information Security Management Best Practice Workbook: Implementation and Management Roadmap for Threats, Challenges and Solutions - Ready to Use Supporting Documents Bringing Theory Into Practice. Lulu. (Blokdijk and Menken 2008)
Whitman, M., & Mattord, H. (2010). Management of information security. (3rd ed., p. 6). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
The Department of Homeland Security has a prominent role in maintaining the safety, security and resilience of our nation. In a world where terrorism is an ever-increasing threat and where man-made and natural disasters have left people and areas in devastation, the Department of Homeland Security works diligently to prevent and protect the United States from the effects of such tragedy. In order to effectively protect our nation Department of Homeland Security must assess the risk associated with any terrorist, natural or man-made threat. The risk assessment method that the department uses takes into account certain variables that help the department determine the level of risk. Based on the assessed risk level Homeland Security uses risk management for strategic planning, operations, determining the allocation of resources and grant awards in an attempt to prepare for and mitigate any harm to our nation, critical infrastructure and its people in the event of a tragedy.
Risk is present in nearly every action and decision made around the world. Decisions and plans are determined primarily through discovering the risks and finding ways to avoid them and mitigate their impact. There is no doubt that with a mission of greater importance comes greater and more numerous threats and that is why managing risks is a high priority for Homeland Security in the U.S. To ensure the best possible security and safety decisions and plans, homeland security professionals must calculate every risk and find solutions to prevent or mitigate damage they might cause. Policy directly relates to potential risks and without the key resource of research management the nation would not be safe.
Using principles of risk management can help policymakers reach informed decisions regarding the best ways to prioritize investments in security programs so that these investments target the areas of greatest need. (!) The DHS had to establish a risk management framework to help the department target its investments in security programs and disaster recovery based on risk. For DHS to have an effective way of conducting risk management, they had to develop a means for every agency to conduct risk management. DHS created the Risk Steering Committee who vision was to enable individual elements, groups of elements, or the entire homeland security enterprise to simultaneously and effectively assess, analyze, and manage risk from multiple perspectives across the homeland security mission space (National Research Council, 2010). One of their first tasking they took on to get the department on the same page was to establish a common vocabulary in dealing with risk management. The DHS Risk Steering Committee developed the Risk Lexicon, which made a common, unambiguous set of official terms and definitions to ease and improve the communication of risk-related issues for DHS (National Research Council, 2010). It facilitates consistency and uniformity in the usage of reporting risk-related information for the department and allots the Risk Steering Committee to set the priorities by evaluating the
The purposes of this paper are to describe how to assess the validity of risk assessment tools using several easy-to-follow formulas and to demonstrate using calculations and methodology to compare risk assessment screening tools. Since some of the terminology may not be familiar, definitions are provided so the reader can refer to them while practicing the calculations (Textbox 1).
In fact, there are numerous reasons that make risk management a necessity in order to meet homeland security’s goals. For one, risk management facilitates well-structured priority level planning in order to achieve a more structured process, which aims to become more standard across the board for all functions and activities within homeland security. Second, risk management develops specific performance calculations and measurements by using formulas and other variables to present a plethora of data collected for planning and decision making purposes. Lastly, risk management aims to achieve cohesively developed goals and objectives within its enterprise by the use of integrated
National security in the United States is extremely important and requires extensive risk management measures including strategic, exercise, operational and capability-based planning, research, development, and making resource decisions in order to address real-world events, maintain safety, security and resilience (Department of Homeland Security [DHS], 2011). The national security and threat assessment process consists of identifying the risk and establishing an objective, analyzing the relative risks and environment, exploring alternatives and devising a plan of action for risk management, decision making and continued monitoring and surveillance (DHS, 2011). Identifying risks entails establishing a context to define the risk, considering related risks and varying scenarios, including the unlikely ones, which then leads to the analysis phase; gathering data and utilizing various methodologies and analysis data software systems to survey incidence rates, relative risks, prevalence rates, likelihood and probable outcomes (DHS, 2011). These two key phases lay the foundation to explore alternatives and devise action plans. Threats, vulnerabilities and consequences (TCV) are also a key component of many national security risk management assessments because it directly relates to safety and operation capabilities, but the text stress that it should not be included in the framework of every assessment because it is not always applicable (DHS, 2011).
Whitman, M. E. & Mattord, H. J. (2011). Principles of information security. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
There is a lot of complexity in understanding risk management and its correlation to homeland security. Risk management is a way to approach the fact that securing the homeland is not certain and there are unknown variables in every aspect of life; risk management is a way to narrow down the focus based on quantifiable information determining probability against capability. Risk management plays and integral role in homeland security. Risk management is employed using a formula described in the NIPP for establishing a narrow scope to make the best decision about protecting infrastructure. The risk management formula lays down the foundation to make the most reasonable determination based on the potential consequences, vulnerability, and
NSIT 800-30, Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems. This document describes a forma approach to risk assessment that includes threat and vulnerability identification, control analysis, impact analysis, and a matrix depiction of risk determination and control recommendations. When security professionals apply a qualitative or quantitative risk assessment, an organization management can begin the process of deciding what steps, if any, need to be implemented to manage the risk identified in the risk assessment. There are four general approaches to risk assessments (Gregory, 2010):
Over the past decade, risk and uncertainty have increasingly become major issues which impact business activities. Many organizations are raising awareness to minimize the adverse consequences by implementing the process of Risk Management Framework which plays a significant role in mitigating almost all categories of risks. According to Ward (2005), the objective of risk management is to enhance a company’s performance. In particular, the importance of the framework is to assist top management in developing a sensible risk management strategy and program.
Whitman, M., & Mattford, H. (2010). Management of Information Security (3rd ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.
Risk assessment comes under BIA (Business impact analysis) and gauging the probability and losses by a threat (Alexander et al., 2013).
This report aim to explain how is achieved risk control through strategies and through security management of information.
As the first step, identify potential risks plays a crucial role in the risk management process. The core purpose of identifying risk is to figure out causes of risk and analyze result caused by the risks and its probability . Hence, risk identification can begin with the source of problem, or with the problem itself. The chosen method of identifying risk may depend on culture, industry practice and compliance. The identification