Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of Edward Said's introduction to orientalism
Analysis of Edward Said's introduction to orientalism
Analysis of Edward Said's introduction to orientalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Misunderstanding between East and West has become so common today that the clash between the two civilizations has become a cliché. In recent history, numerous wars and conflicts have erupted as a result of Occidental misperceptions of the Orient and vice versa. To the European mind, the Maghreb, Persia, the Levant, Arabia, Anatolia, and the adjacent lands are but a single entity evoking poetic visions of the Orient. While it may be true that among these regions, certain commonalities exist, diversity and the richness of several cultures more aptly describes the Orient. Edward Said’s “Introduction” to Orientalism aids readers in understanding the basis for Rhonda Vander Sluis’s companions – prejudice and stereotype – in her search for identity in Turkey.
More than anything else, in his “Introduction” to Orientalism Edward Said attempts to educate his readers about the flaws he sees in the European notion of Orientalism. He identifies generalization as the root cause of differences and misunderstanding between Europe and the Orient. As Said sees it, Orientalism is both an academic model and a poetic one (Said 2, 3). Europe created Orientalism politically, socially, and militarily, thus every European traveler and poet who has written about the Orient is tainted by this construct. Travelers such as François-René Chateaubriand and Gérard de Nerval are credited with helping to create the Orient as a European concept that explains North Africa, the Holy Lands, Persia, Turkey and the contiguous realms. These Romantics saw Turkey as an idyllic land, “voulant d'abord aller à Troie, par piété poétique”1 for they were enamored of the Orient’s poetic splendor (Chateaubriand). Though it is possible to write a more “coarse polemic...
... middle of paper ...
...net/chateaubriandmemoiredoutretombe.txt>.
Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.
Vander Sluis, Rhonda. "Failed Missionary." Tales from the Expat Harem: Foreign Women in Modern Turkey. Ed. Anastasia M. Ashman and Jennifer Eaton Gökeman. Emeryville, CA: Seal Press, 2006. 274-82.
Hikmet, Nazιm, “Autobiography.” An Anthology of Turkish Literature. Ed. Kemal Silay. Bloomington, IN: Cem Publishing. 2006. 325-6.
Kinzer, Stephen. Crescent and Star: Turkey Between Two Worlds. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux. 2001.
Pamuk, Orhan. Istanbul: Memories and the City. New York: Vintage Books. 2006.
Silay, Kemal, “Nazιm Hikmet Ran.” An Anthology of Turkish Literature. Ed. Kemal Silay. Bloomington, IN: Cem Publishing. 2006. 325-6.
Wood, Allen, “Alienation.” The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1995.
Jaber , Kamel S. Abu . "The Millet System in the Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Empire." The Muslim World 57, no. 3 (1967): 212-223. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.14781913.1967.tb01260.x/abstract?globalMessage=0 (accessed April 28, 2011).
Greene, Frederick Davis. The Armenian Crisis and the Rule of the Turk. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1895. Print.
Orientalism, which became famous as a term after Edward Said’s book written in 1978, explains a power relation between the Orient and the Occident inspiring from the Foucault’s The Archeology of Knowledge and
But, utilizing both Napoleon’s ideas on national hegemony and also Hegel’s views on the evolution and progression of consciousness clearly show that the Orient, particularly in the era after Sykes-Picot, was a region doomed to conflict and turmoil. This internecine conflict infamously linked to the Orient has now clouded our scholarly and geopolitical understanding of the area, making it our scholarly imperative to analyze and assess the modern Orient as 1) a product of Anglo-French interests and 2) as a region arbitrarily categorized into states entirely unprepared for the prospect of nation
Damrosch, David and David L. Pike. The Longman Anthology of World Literature Second Edition. Pearson Education, Inc., 2009.
Özcan, Azmi. "Empire, Ottoman." Encyclopedia of Western Colonialism since 1450. Ed. Thomas Benjamin. Vol. 1. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2007. 407-416. World History in Context. Web. 30 Apr. 2014.
Houston, Jeanne Wakatsuki and James D. Houston. Farewell to Manzanar New York: bantam book, 1973. Print
Lawall, Sarah,et al. The Norton Anthology of World Literature. 2nd ed. Volume A (slipcased). Norton, 2001. W.W. Norton and Company Inc. New York, NY.
BAYKAL, Nurulhude. "MURATHAN MUNGAN'in "ZAMANIMIZIN BİR KÜLKEDİSİ"Nİ MARKSİST KURAM ÇERÇEVESİNDE OKUMAK. (Turkish)." Milli Folklor 24.96 (2012): 137-147. Academic Search Premier. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
Domrosch, David. Longman Anthology of World Literature, The, Compact Edition. 1st Edition. Pearson College Div: Longman, 2007. Print.
Literature of the Western World, Volume 2. 4th edition by Brian Wilkie and James Hurt. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1997.
Al Ghazali, Zainab. Return of the Pharaoh: Memoir in Nasir’s Prison. The Islamic Foundation, 2006. Pp. vii, 188.
Pramoedya Ananta Toer. "Inem". Contemporary Literature of Asia. Arthur Biddle et al (ed.) Blair: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996. 139-148.
Said describes the construction of the concept of Orientalism as a process of three historical stages that started from a relationship of familiarity and closes between the West - that was represented those days especially by France and Britain. The first stage took place until the early nineteen century, and included mostly “India and the Bible lands”. The second stage started at the beginning of the nineteen century and lasted until the end of World War Two and was based on a relationship of domination, and the third stage contains the shift of dominant power from Europe to The United
Orhan Pamuk’s Istanbul: Memories and the City is an iridescent evocation of Istanbul’s fate, history, and cultural diversity recollected in the form of memories, allowing the readers to connect with Pamuk’s life experiences. The above is made possible through the use of both, past as well as present, which co-exist as a centerpiece in this memoir.