Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chapter 2Chapter 2 Diversity in Organizations
essays on diversity within an organization
the impact of diversity of on organizations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Chapter 2Chapter 2 Diversity in Organizations
Focusing on the definition of organizational dissent and how it impacts the organization, there first has to be a comprehension of the word dissent. According to Morris (1996) the history of the word dissent comes from the combination of two words from the Latin language, dissentlre and sentire. Kassing (2011) simplified the word dissent to an individual feeling apart. When observing dissent throughout organizations, dissent deals with a member feeling excluded from the organization. Kassing (1998, pg. 183) defined organizational dissent as expressing disagreement or contradictory opinions about the organization. Organizational dissent is the ability of the employee to question and produce feedback for policies and practices found within the
Croucher, Perrett, Zeng and Gomez (2014) identified three important factors to this definition. The first factor is dissent is something that can be expressed to another individual. The other two aspects of dissent that helps us understand the meaning is how it needs to be included in the process of one engaging in a discussion focusing on disagreement and also opposing views against the practices, policies, and procedures or operations conducted throughout the organization. These factors of dissent produce feedback that is frequently linked to conflict but many times dissent is limited to the employee to just the feeling of separation from the organization but not actually revealing those feelings (Kassing, 1997). The notion attached to dissent can be expressed throughout many
Kassing (2000) conducted a study that allowed for him to develop a hypothesis that states employees reported using more articulated dissent and less latent dissent when freedom of speech exists in the workplace. The results of Kassing’s (2000) study specify that the level or identification and involvement of the decision making process is affected by the perception the employees has of his or her organizational identification. Another Kassing (2000b) study exemplified that the quality of the relationship is impacted by how the employees decided to communicate with management and also affects what message and concerns employees will express to management. Kassing’s (2000b) study indicated that employees and managers who have high quality relationships are more likely to have personal communication and a beneficial relationship for both individuals and the organization as whole. Results of Kassing’s (2008) study showed similar results and he was able to conclude employee’s views of justice within the organization will affect the amount they communicate
There has been much research done on organizational dissent, but there is a dearth of research dedicated to how television shows portray dissent over the airwaves. In Deviating From the Script: A Content Analysis of Organizational Dissent as Portrayed on Primetime Television by Johny T. Garner, Emily S. Kinsky, Andrei C. Duta, and Julia Danker, the authors attempted to combine these two theories for their study. Using the data collected by the authors and their research team, the authors resolved to measure how effective the dissent was in creating change. Organizational dissent is important in nonfictional workplaces for a variety of reasons, and these results indicate one potential influence on organizational members that may depict dissent as futile (Garner et al., 2012, p. 620). The authors set about trying to quantify organizational dissent on network television in the primetime hours. The authors also argued that organizational dissent was the challenge of status quo and the benefits of this challenge was of value to both the dissenter and the organization as well. This review will provide a critical analysis of the article as well offer some insights into where the authors’ research could go further.
Dissent and disagreement are synonyms for each other. Dissent does not belong in one crowd of people while disagreement resides in another. They belong together, and they can change social, political, and economic problems together. Boorstin may have seen a big difference in the two regarding minorities and majorities, but I believe that disagreements and dissents start out as small ideas and grow into something bigger without ever changing their purpose. This is seen in history all around the world, and it is still happening
Workplace conflict can be caused by various factors, and can cause a great deal of stress for all those involved. We as human beings have different beliefs, and share different opinions on ideas. We also work and communicate differently, and in the different environments work, community and home that leaves room for disagreements. Conflict is often thought of as negativity, but it can enlighten the environment once resolved in the correct manner. Something as simple as difference in personalities can cause a major conflict in the workplace.
Conflicts in the workplace are one of the most challenging managerial tasks because of the differences in people’s morals and principles (Mayhew, 2013). It’s a double-edged sword because managers needed to use his person skills to gain the confidence of his subordinates and at the same time, be firm and bold in upholding company policies (Mayhew, 2013). An effective manager handles potential issues with a precautionary approach, keeping in mind that conflicts may arise due to diversity of opinion, values, and individual backgrounds (Mayhew, 2013).
It is this capability of the management to cultivate communication that is important towards effective engagement with the employee (Albrech, 2011). It is not just a one-sided affair of a company engaging employee, but also mutual loop where the employee is also engaging the company. After all, it takes two hands to clap. “Voice must be approached in a genuine and authentic way, and treated as more than just a cosmetic exercise. An authentic use of voice means that when the employee is invited to speak up, the company in return will both listen and will respond to what the employee says, even if just to explain why they cannot carry out a request for change. Feedback is vital and action must be seen to follow.” (Dromey et al, 2012, p.17).
Useem states that leaders should have more personal interaction with his employees and make events as personal as possible such as a simple handshake and a brief look in the eye “Those small actions make an indelible impression.”(Useem p.76) Likewise Capelli et al. states in his article that leaders with effective communication will inspire their subordinates, he gave examples of three different companies in India showing their system of communication to resolve organizational or personal problems, such as a website where employees can post their queries and their issues will be resolved shortly. Or it can be made with eye to eye contact by meetings and u let these employees make the decisions for the company where no boarders are set on the table or o limit for the relationship between them.(Capelli p. 59). However, although Ladkin & Weber assured on the importance of communication, on the other hand they did focus more on the communication between customers and employees, as in their text customer comes first and customer satisfaction affects organizational performance, the leader in their text is the one who leads the team and makes sure they are going according to plan, he is strict boss who follows guidelines, and not so open minded about alternative views from the
Communication helps the organizational members to make both personal and organizational goals. And also help them to co-ordinate on the internal activities of the organization. To the extent the less effective communication of any organization is the less e...
Singleton, R., Toombs, L. A., Taneja, S., Larkin, C., & Pryor, M. G. (2011). Workplace conflict: a strategic leadership imperative. International Journal of Business and Public Administration [IJBPA], 8(1), 149+. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA335188917&v=2.1&u=nie&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w&asid=14f75b25a98950f95b40393bf8b6d92e
The critical theory of communication developed by Stanley Deetz was designed to explore ways to insure the organizations’ health while increasing the representation of diverse human interests. He does this first by showing that corporations have become political as well as economic institutions. Deetz then employs advances in communication theory to point out how communication practices within a corporation can distort decision making. Finally, he outlines how workplaces can become more productive and democratic through communication reforms.
Organisational, or workplace conflict, manifest through many different causes such as values, actual or perceived duties in opposition, different interests among those working together and beliefs. Conflict in organisations appears in many different forms. There is a collision between individuals and groups that are affected by power and formal authority. Disputes are related to how the
One of the most important, but often overlooked, aspects of a business is the internal relations and communication of the employees. Business ' focus tends to lean in the direction of the customer, and customer interaction, so that they feel valued and accommodated to their needs. Of course, there is no technical wrongdoing through this to employees – they simply continue doing the job set before them. However, it can be seen that there is much benefit to focusing company energies, not only on customers, but also on the internal relations and communication between employees. By looking more closely at the definitions, importance, and value of internal relations and employee interaction, one should be able to have a better understanding of their
Work psychologists have highlighted that the concept of organisational justice is revolved around three distinct, but overlapping components; distributive, procedural and interactional justice (Ambrose & Schminke, 2007). Distributive justice pertains to the distribution of workplace outcomes and decisions, such as promotions and pay rises. Distributive justice violations occur when these decisions are unfairly dispersed due to bias or other unjustifiable circumstances. Procedural justice deals with the process that was used in order to come to these decisions. Violations of this component could occur when the steps and reasoning in which a decision was made are deemed prejudice or unfair. Lastly, interactional justice is associated with the quality in which an employee was treated throughout the decision making process. Bies and Moag (1986) detail that truthfulness, respect, propriety and sound justification are the primary elements of interactional justice and by eliminating any one of these from employee-employer communication will result in both a communication breakdown and a breach of organisational justice.
Communication is a very important aspect in leadership. It involves the ability of managers and other leaders in an organization to engage employees through effective listening and understanding of any issues that may be making it difficult for them to realize their full potential. The need for good communication capabilities in the workplace is to make sure that leaders give employees enough time to air their opinions before any binding directions are made. It is always necessary for leaders to remain mindful of the manner in wh...
Unnecessary conflict may be prevented through employee involvement and treating employees in a fair manner. Ethical employment practices, involving employees in decisions, and treating employees as valued organizational members all work towards a positive employer-employee relationship. Unfortunately, however, it sometimes becomes necessary for an outside party to help employers and employees resolve differences through processes such as mediation or arbitration. Taken together, positive engagement strategies and constructive resolution of differences help to develop relationships which support organizational performance and success.
The first skill for managers to understand and practice is communications, because it is the foundation for all actions in the workplace and it allows the supervisor or manager an opportunity to build relationships with the overall workgroup without alienating anyone in the work environment (Roper, 2005). As a manager it is very important to be able to communicate effectively. As Robert Kent, former dean of Harvard Business School has said, “In business, communication is everything” (Blalock, 2005). The Wisconsin Business School Alumni Association recently reported that managers spend 75 percent to 80 percent of their time communicating (Blalock, 2005). Communication skills are critical for success in an organization. Successful managers communicate to where their targeted audience understands (Froschheiser, 2010). Managers need to give positive and negative feedback to their employees to let them know their strengths and weaknesses and where they n...